Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Why does the Sumatra subduction zone host more giant earthquakes than Java? Thermal structure and mineralogical insights
View through CrossRef
The episodic stick-slip behavior of megathrust faults in subduction zones can lead to severe earthquakes and tsunamis that pose a catastrophic threat to coastal populations. It is therefore of great importance to study their seismogenic conditions and earthquake activity. The subduction zones of Sumatra and Java, located seaward of the Sunda Arc, are geographically neighboring, but their earthquake phenomena differ significantly. The Sumatra subduction zone has been the scene of numerous very strong earthquakes (Mw > 8), including the 2004 Sumatra earthquake of magnitude Mw 9.1, while the Java subduction zone has experienced only a limited number of large earthquakes, with a maximum magnitude of less than Mw 8. So far, the underlying mechanism explaining this seismological mismatch between these two margins remains enigmatic. To determine the possible cause, we first calculated the 2D steady-state subduction zone thermal model using the finite element method off the coast of Sumatra and Java based on regional tectonic settings. We then extracted the pressure-temperature (P-T) conditions of the megathrusts and analyzed their relationship to the mineral composition of the megathrust shear zone, the serpentine metamorphic reaction, the frictional behavior, and the characteristics of historical earthquakes. Based on the modeling results, we found that the Sumatra megathrust can trigger large earthquakes in both the crustal and mantle regions from the seafloor to a depth of 60 km, covering a seismogenic zone of about 200 km in width. In contrast, the predicted seismogenic zone off the coast of Java is mainly restricted to the crustal region (< 20 km depth), with a width of less than 50 km. The main reason for this discrepancy is primarily related to the age of the subducted oceanic crust and the depth of the arc crustal Moho. The very hot oceanic crust off the coast of Sumatra enhances the metamorphic reaction of the serpentine minerals below the shallow part of the mantle wedge from the velocity-strengthening minerals lizardite/chrysotile to the velocity-weakening mineral antigorite, which facilitates the generation and rupture of earthquakes. In contrast, the P-T condition of the Java subduction is too cold to promote such a metamorphic reaction and thus facilitate earthquake rupture below the mantle wedge.
Copernicus GmbH
Title: Why does the Sumatra subduction zone host more giant earthquakes than Java? Thermal structure and mineralogical insights
Description:
The episodic stick-slip behavior of megathrust faults in subduction zones can lead to severe earthquakes and tsunamis that pose a catastrophic threat to coastal populations.
It is therefore of great importance to study their seismogenic conditions and earthquake activity.
The subduction zones of Sumatra and Java, located seaward of the Sunda Arc, are geographically neighboring, but their earthquake phenomena differ significantly.
The Sumatra subduction zone has been the scene of numerous very strong earthquakes (Mw > 8), including the 2004 Sumatra earthquake of magnitude Mw 9.
1, while the Java subduction zone has experienced only a limited number of large earthquakes, with a maximum magnitude of less than Mw 8.
So far, the underlying mechanism explaining this seismological mismatch between these two margins remains enigmatic.
To determine the possible cause, we first calculated the 2D steady-state subduction zone thermal model using the finite element method off the coast of Sumatra and Java based on regional tectonic settings.
We then extracted the pressure-temperature (P-T) conditions of the megathrusts and analyzed their relationship to the mineral composition of the megathrust shear zone, the serpentine metamorphic reaction, the frictional behavior, and the characteristics of historical earthquakes.
Based on the modeling results, we found that the Sumatra megathrust can trigger large earthquakes in both the crustal and mantle regions from the seafloor to a depth of 60 km, covering a seismogenic zone of about 200 km in width.
In contrast, the predicted seismogenic zone off the coast of Java is mainly restricted to the crustal region (< 20 km depth), with a width of less than 50 km.
The main reason for this discrepancy is primarily related to the age of the subducted oceanic crust and the depth of the arc crustal Moho.
The very hot oceanic crust off the coast of Sumatra enhances the metamorphic reaction of the serpentine minerals below the shallow part of the mantle wedge from the velocity-strengthening minerals lizardite/chrysotile to the velocity-weakening mineral antigorite, which facilitates the generation and rupture of earthquakes.
In contrast, the P-T condition of the Java subduction is too cold to promote such a metamorphic reaction and thus facilitate earthquake rupture below the mantle wedge.
Related Results
Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere
Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere
Subduction of an oceanic plate beneath either an oceanic, or a continental, overriding plate requires two main conditions to occur in a steady state: i) a high enough subduction ra...
Sismotectonique du prisme de la Barbade : implications sur le potentiel sismogénique de la zone de subduction des Antilles
Sismotectonique du prisme de la Barbade : implications sur le potentiel sismogénique de la zone de subduction des Antilles
La zone de subduction des Petites Antilles résulte de la subduction des plaques nord- et sud-américaines sous la plaque Caraïbe dans une direction SW à ~ 2 cm/an. Cette zone pourra...
Dynamics of multiple microcontinent accretion during oceanic subduction
Dynamics of multiple microcontinent accretion during oceanic subduction
Microcontinent accretion during oceanic subduction is one of the main contributors to continental crustal growth. Many of the continental mountain belts we find today were built fr...
The tectonic expression slab pull at continental convergent boundaries
The tectonic expression slab pull at continental convergent boundaries
Examination of five thrust belt systems developed at continental subduction boundaries suggests that they comprise two distinct groups that display pronounced and systematic differ...
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
<p><b>In this thesis, controlled-source seismic data acquired during two regional-scale experiments are analysed to determine the offshore lithospheric structure at the...
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
<p><b>In this thesis, controlled-source seismic data acquired during two regional-scale experiments are analysed to determine the offshore lithospheric structure at the...
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
<p><b>In this thesis, controlled-source seismic data acquired during two regional-scale experiments are analysed to determine the offshore lithospheric structure at the...
Investigating Global Correlations Between Earthquake-generated Tsunamis and Subduction Zone Characteristics
Investigating Global Correlations Between Earthquake-generated Tsunamis and Subduction Zone Characteristics
Tsunamigenic earthquakes pose a large hazard in subduction zones, but it is currently unclear in which - if any - tectonic setting they preferentially occur. Here, we compile the g...

