Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Barriers to Doctoral Degree Attainment: Problems of the Period after Postgraduate Studies

View through CrossRef
Increasing the effectiveness of postgraduate programs is now becoming one of the most important issues in ensuring the economic development of the state. As a rule, Russian postgraduate students, who are aimed at getting an academic degree, fail to defend their theses during their postgraduate studies, and they need additional time to complete their work. The purpose of this research article is to identify and analyze the key problems faced by Russian postgraduates seeking to submit their dissertations for defense. Our investigation comes to be original in two aspects. First, in contrast to other empirical studies of postgraduate school, the authors’ attention is focused on the barriers to attaining a degree, which arise not in the course of study, but after graduation. Second, the analysis is based on interviewing those graduates who have successfully overcome these barriers and defended their PhD theses. The empirical base of the study is online questionnaire surveys of Russian PhDs (Candidates of Science) who have recently completed their postgraduate studies, as well as administrative and managerial workers responsible for postgraduate students’ training and certification. The quantitative data obtained indicate that the presence or absence of a dissertation council in an organization wherein postgraduate students are trained is one of the key factors determining the pace and effectiveness of the postgraduates’ proceeding to an academic degree. In general, the results of the study make it possible to conclude that the difficulties at the final stage of preparing a dissertation are largely due to the imperfection of the mechanism for pairing the systems of state scientific certification and scientific and pedagogical personnel postgraduate training. Thus, we discuss possible organizational and managerial decisions of how to bring these systems closer and improve the performance of postgraduate studies. This paper might be of interest for higher education researchers, as well as for scientific, pedagogical and administrative workers involved in the management of personnel training and higher scientific qualifications certification.
Title: Barriers to Doctoral Degree Attainment: Problems of the Period after Postgraduate Studies
Description:
Increasing the effectiveness of postgraduate programs is now becoming one of the most important issues in ensuring the economic development of the state.
As a rule, Russian postgraduate students, who are aimed at getting an academic degree, fail to defend their theses during their postgraduate studies, and they need additional time to complete their work.
The purpose of this research article is to identify and analyze the key problems faced by Russian postgraduates seeking to submit their dissertations for defense.
Our investigation comes to be original in two aspects.
First, in contrast to other empirical studies of postgraduate school, the authors’ attention is focused on the barriers to attaining a degree, which arise not in the course of study, but after graduation.
Second, the analysis is based on interviewing those graduates who have successfully overcome these barriers and defended their PhD theses.
The empirical base of the study is online questionnaire surveys of Russian PhDs (Candidates of Science) who have recently completed their postgraduate studies, as well as administrative and managerial workers responsible for postgraduate students’ training and certification.
The quantitative data obtained indicate that the presence or absence of a dissertation council in an organization wherein postgraduate students are trained is one of the key factors determining the pace and effectiveness of the postgraduates’ proceeding to an academic degree.
In general, the results of the study make it possible to conclude that the difficulties at the final stage of preparing a dissertation are largely due to the imperfection of the mechanism for pairing the systems of state scientific certification and scientific and pedagogical personnel postgraduate training.
Thus, we discuss possible organizational and managerial decisions of how to bring these systems closer and improve the performance of postgraduate studies.
This paper might be of interest for higher education researchers, as well as for scientific, pedagogical and administrative workers involved in the management of personnel training and higher scientific qualifications certification.

Related Results

Doctoral Schools as Learning Organizations: A Polish Perspective
Doctoral Schools as Learning Organizations: A Polish Perspective
Aim/Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze doctoral schools as a new form of doctoral education in Poland through the prism of the concept of a learning organization. This pa...
Facilitating a Mentoring Programme for Doctoral Students: Insights from Evidence-Based Practice
Facilitating a Mentoring Programme for Doctoral Students: Insights from Evidence-Based Practice
Aim/Purpose: One approach to helping doctoral students deal with the many challenges they face is the provision of a structured mentoring programme to complement the more tradition...
Validation in Doctoral Education: Exploring PhD Students’ Perceptions of Belonging to Scaffold Doctoral Identity Work
Validation in Doctoral Education: Exploring PhD Students’ Perceptions of Belonging to Scaffold Doctoral Identity Work
Aim/Purpose: The aim of this article is to make a case of the role of validation in doctoral education. The purpose is to detail findings from three studies which explore PhD stude...
The (National) Doctoral Dissertations Assessment in China: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis
The (National) Doctoral Dissertations Assessment in China: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis
Aim/Purpose: Our study explores the perspectives of international doctoral graduates on ‎‎(national) dissertation assessment in China.‎ Background: In the absence of national stan...
Mapping Doctoral Education and Supervision Research (2014-2024): Insights, Trends, and Trajectories
Mapping Doctoral Education and Supervision Research (2014-2024): Insights, Trends, and Trajectories
Aim/Purpose: The conventional model of doctoral education, centered on conducting original research within an apprentice-supervisor framework, has evolved progressively toward alte...
1 Osler and the fellowship of postgraduate medicine
1 Osler and the fellowship of postgraduate medicine
Abstract Sir William Osler’s legacy lives on through the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM). Osler was in 1911 founding President both of the Postgraduate Med...
THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE FELLOWSHIP OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE TO MEDICINE 1919–2025
THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE FELLOWSHIP OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE TO MEDICINE 1919–2025
Abstract Sir William Osler Bt, considered by many the greatest figure in the medical world at the time, arrived in Britain in 1905 when he was appointed Regius Pr...
International Curriculum and Conceptual Approaches to Doctoral Programs in Leadership Studies
International Curriculum and Conceptual Approaches to Doctoral Programs in Leadership Studies
Aim/Purpose: This study explores the various teaching and learning approaches, curriculum design, and program requirements for 70 doctoral programs in leadership. Background: Earl...

Back to Top