Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Safety and efficacy of the supine versus the prone miniperc in preschool children: Prospective randomized study
View through CrossRef
Purpose:
The use of the supine position is even less explored, although comparisons to the prone position are promising, with great advantages of the supine position. The reproducibility of the miniperc technique in the pediatric population prompted this study to focus on the proposed enhanced maneuverability of the mini-nephoscope to navigate the targeted intrarenal system while maintaining a comparable stone-free rate in the supine position.
Materials and methods:
This study analyzed 50 children, 7 years old or less, with renal stones (>1.5 cm) indicated for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL) at the Tertiary University Hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to the supine position mini-PNL (group I) and the standard prone mini-PNL (group II). Patients were followed for 3 months from the last operative intervention. Perioperative variables, including patient and stone demographics, intraoperative accessibility, access fluoroscopy time, operative time, and operative adverse events, are documented. Stone free rate (SFR), complications, and the need for accessory measures were also reported, and all were compared between groups.
Results:
Both supine (96%) and prone (88%) positions primarily used a single access. The supine position demonstrated significantly greater accessibility to all calyces (84% vs 48%,
P
= 0.02). SFR was higher in the supine (96%) versus the prone position (84%), without significance. Shorter operative (53.9 min vs 65.4 min,
P
= 0.01) and fluoroscopy times (117.2 s vs 136.4 s,
P
= 0.02) in supine versus prone cases. Operative complications were comparable in both groups.
Conclusion:
The findings of this study support that supine miniperc in children offers a variety of access options, and it allows for more accessibility to the entire pelvicalyceal system than encountered in the prone position. This allows for enhanced stone clearance in a lesser operative time with comparable safety and SFR.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Safety and efficacy of the supine versus the prone miniperc in preschool children: Prospective randomized study
Description:
Purpose:
The use of the supine position is even less explored, although comparisons to the prone position are promising, with great advantages of the supine position.
The reproducibility of the miniperc technique in the pediatric population prompted this study to focus on the proposed enhanced maneuverability of the mini-nephoscope to navigate the targeted intrarenal system while maintaining a comparable stone-free rate in the supine position.
Materials and methods:
This study analyzed 50 children, 7 years old or less, with renal stones (>1.
5 cm) indicated for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL) at the Tertiary University Hospital.
Patients were randomly assigned to the supine position mini-PNL (group I) and the standard prone mini-PNL (group II).
Patients were followed for 3 months from the last operative intervention.
Perioperative variables, including patient and stone demographics, intraoperative accessibility, access fluoroscopy time, operative time, and operative adverse events, are documented.
Stone free rate (SFR), complications, and the need for accessory measures were also reported, and all were compared between groups.
Results:
Both supine (96%) and prone (88%) positions primarily used a single access.
The supine position demonstrated significantly greater accessibility to all calyces (84% vs 48%,
P
= 0.
02).
SFR was higher in the supine (96%) versus the prone position (84%), without significance.
Shorter operative (53.
9 min vs 65.
4 min,
P
= 0.
01) and fluoroscopy times (117.
2 s vs 136.
4 s,
P
= 0.
02) in supine versus prone cases.
Operative complications were comparable in both groups.
Conclusion:
The findings of this study support that supine miniperc in children offers a variety of access options, and it allows for more accessibility to the entire pelvicalyceal system than encountered in the prone position.
This allows for enhanced stone clearance in a lesser operative time with comparable safety and SFR.
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPINE POSITION VERSUS PRONE POSITION IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A SINGLE CENTERED ANALYSIS OF 623 CASES
COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPINE POSITION VERSUS PRONE POSITION IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A SINGLE CENTERED ANALYSIS OF 623 CASES
Background: The ideal urological method for treating complex, large renal calculi is Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Its instruments, surgical techniques, and positions have a...
Comparison of stone-free rate, operative parameters, and complication rate according to Guy’s stone score in supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective observational study
Comparison of stone-free rate, operative parameters, and complication rate according to Guy’s stone score in supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective observational study
Background: The term supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has emerged as a viable alternative to the traditional prone approach. Supine positioning offers several theoretical...
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine versus Prone Position in Tertiary Hospital in Mysore: A Prospective Cohort Study
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine versus Prone Position in Tertiary Hospital in Mysore: A Prospective Cohort Study
Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a procedure of choice for large renal calculi. It is a common urological procedure. PCNL can be performed in various positions....
Is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy an alternative to prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Our experience at a tertiary care center
Is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy an alternative to prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Our experience at a tertiary care center
Background: Majority of urologists prefer the usual prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) but due to various disadvantages of prone PCNL, several alternative posit...
Characterizing the imaging environment for supine breast MRI
Characterizing the imaging environment for supine breast MRI
Abstract
Purpose
Supine breast MRI has the potential to improve over standard prone breast magnetic resonance imaging (MR...
Short-term effects of combining upright and prone positions in patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized study
Short-term effects of combining upright and prone positions in patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized study
Abstract
Introduction
Prone position is known to improve oxygenation in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) and the acute respirat...
Correlation of Echocardiographic Parameters in Prone and Supine Positions in Normal Adults Using a Novel Approach.
Correlation of Echocardiographic Parameters in Prone and Supine Positions in Normal Adults Using a Novel Approach.
Abstract Background: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in prone
position is challenging. Innovative use of transesophageal
echocardiography (TEE) probe to perform TTE for such p...

