Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 4147463: Impact of Timing on Outcomes in Rescue PCI for STEMI: Early vs. Late Intervention
View through CrossRef
Introduction:
American guidelines recommend rescue PCI within 3 to 24 hours after failed fibrinolysis in patients with ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic instability, or other high-risk features. Given the large areas covered by relatively few centers, rescue PCI can be delayed.
Aims:
This abstract aims to compare complications in patients undergoing early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis).
Methods:
A prospective registry was conducted, patients over 18 years with diagnosis of STEMI undergoing rescue PCI (reperfusion therapy when thrombolysis has failed) in a tertiary cardiology center in Mexico from august of 2023 to april of 2024 were included. We divided patients into two groups, the ones who received early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis).
Results:
109 patients who received late Rescue PCI and 56 patients who received early Rescue PCI were included. Baseline characteristics in patients undergoing Rescue PCI before and after 6 hours are presented in table 1. Patients who underwent late rescue PCI showed worsening heart failure (KK: Killip Kimball IV) 14.2% vs 9.1% (p= 0.319.). The Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported with statistical significance are angina (p value 0.048) and especially renal failure (p= 0.016). The survival rate was significantly higher when the patient entered rescue PCI after 6 hours 95.4% vs 89.2% (p = 0.023).
Conclusion:
Although no specific time frame has been set for rescue PCI, patients who underwent to rescue PCI within six hours showed worsening outcomes such as angina and renal failure, possibly due to higher KK grades, the onset of cardiogenic shock, and lower survival rates. A major limitation of our study was the small sample size, which restricted comparisons of MACE with other outcomes. This limitation is expected to improve as our database expands. Despite these findings, it is essential to base the decision to perform a rescue PCI on the patient's initial condition upon arrival at a capable PCI center.
Title: Abstract 4147463: Impact of Timing on Outcomes in Rescue PCI for STEMI: Early vs. Late Intervention
Description:
Introduction:
American guidelines recommend rescue PCI within 3 to 24 hours after failed fibrinolysis in patients with ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic instability, or other high-risk features.
Given the large areas covered by relatively few centers, rescue PCI can be delayed.
Aims:
This abstract aims to compare complications in patients undergoing early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis).
Methods:
A prospective registry was conducted, patients over 18 years with diagnosis of STEMI undergoing rescue PCI (reperfusion therapy when thrombolysis has failed) in a tertiary cardiology center in Mexico from august of 2023 to april of 2024 were included.
We divided patients into two groups, the ones who received early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis).
Results:
109 patients who received late Rescue PCI and 56 patients who received early Rescue PCI were included.
Baseline characteristics in patients undergoing Rescue PCI before and after 6 hours are presented in table 1.
Patients who underwent late rescue PCI showed worsening heart failure (KK: Killip Kimball IV) 14.
2% vs 9.
1% (p= 0.
319.
).
The Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported with statistical significance are angina (p value 0.
048) and especially renal failure (p= 0.
016).
The survival rate was significantly higher when the patient entered rescue PCI after 6 hours 95.
4% vs 89.
2% (p = 0.
023).
Conclusion:
Although no specific time frame has been set for rescue PCI, patients who underwent to rescue PCI within six hours showed worsening outcomes such as angina and renal failure, possibly due to higher KK grades, the onset of cardiogenic shock, and lower survival rates.
A major limitation of our study was the small sample size, which restricted comparisons of MACE with other outcomes.
This limitation is expected to improve as our database expands.
Despite these findings, it is essential to base the decision to perform a rescue PCI on the patient's initial condition upon arrival at a capable PCI center.
Related Results
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THROMBOLYSIS FOLLOWED BY EARLY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VIA TRANSRADIAL ARTERY APPROACH IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THROMBOLYSIS FOLLOWED BY EARLY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VIA TRANSRADIAL ARTERY APPROACH IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Objectives
This study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of thrombolysis followed by early PCI via transradial artery approach in patients with ST-segment...
Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Sana’a City-Yemen (Single center study)
Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Sana’a City-Yemen (Single center study)
Background: Recently, many hospitals in Yemen have been started using Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) procedure for treatment coronary artery disease (CAD), including Dr. ...
Angka Keberhasilan Terapi Reperfusi pada Pasien ST Elevasi Miokard Infark
Angka Keberhasilan Terapi Reperfusi pada Pasien ST Elevasi Miokard Infark
Abstract: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is a kind of acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) with a high rate of mortality. Patients with STEMI are usually treated with rep...
e0540 Efficacy and safety of tirofiban-assisted Delayed PCI in Patients with ST-segment elavation myocardial infarction
e0540 Efficacy and safety of tirofiban-assisted Delayed PCI in Patients with ST-segment elavation myocardial infarction
Objective
To compare the outcomes of IIb/IIIa antagonist assisted PCI within 12–72 h of onset with that of selective PCI within 7–10 days in STEMI patients.
...
Early percutaneous coronary intervention after thrombolysis in STEMI: the early-PCI pilot feasibility study
Early percutaneous coronary intervention after thrombolysis in STEMI: the early-PCI pilot feasibility study
Introduction
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred treatment for patients with STEMI now. But few patients can receive it within 90 mi...
Arrythmic storm in patients with and without a myocardial infarction
Arrythmic storm in patients with and without a myocardial infarction
Abstract
Introduction
Available data on arrhythmic storm (AS) is frequently obtained from retrospective observational series of ...
Managing bifurcations: are two stents better than one?
Managing bifurcations: are two stents better than one?
Abstract
Introduction
Bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a higher degree of complexity when...
Frequency of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients receiving Primary Percutaneous intervention vs Delayed Percutaneous intervention presenting with ST- Elevation Myocardial infarction
Frequency of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients receiving Primary Percutaneous intervention vs Delayed Percutaneous intervention presenting with ST- Elevation Myocardial infarction
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is a significant complication following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), associated with an increased risk of heart failure ...

