Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Luxembourg Third-Country Regimes for Banks, 'Investment Firms' and 'Other PFS'
View through CrossRef
Post-Brexit, third-country firms are increasingly interested to provide banking services/activities and investment services/activities in Luxembourg. The provision of both investment and banking services/activities by third-country firms is largely subject to national law. <br><br>Directive 2014/65/EU, as amended (“MiFID II”) and Regulation (EU) 600/2014, as amended (“MiFIR”) were designed to provide some uniformity to the requirements in the investment services/activities domain. Full harmonization is, however, not possible as some of the provisions, namely those relating to the establishment of a branch under MiFID II, are optional. As a consequence, Luxembourg law provisions that have implemented MiFID II remain relevant as to third-country firms that intend to provide investment services/activities in Luxembourg. The MiFIR requirements relating to the provision of cross-border services are not optional and are, therefore, directly applicable.<br><br>Similarly, under the provisions of Directive 2013/36/EU, as amended (“CRD V”), Luxembourg law governs the ability of credit institutions from third countries to establish a branch or to provide cross-border services in Luxembourg.<br><br>This contribution aims to analyze the Luxembourg third-country regimes that are applicable to non-EU banks and “third-country firms” under the Law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector, as amended (the “LSF”), that are providing such services in Luxembourg. To that end, this contribution discusses in Section 2 the applicable regulatory framework on the basis of which credit institutions and professionals of the financial sector (“PFS”) other than investment firms from third countries (i.e. specialized PFS, support PFS, and data communication service providers within the meaning of the LFS) may perform banking activities/services in Luxembourg. Section 3 then discusses the recently amended (Luxembourg) third-country regime that is applicable to “third-country firms”, which are “firms that would be a credit institution providing investment services or performing investment activities or an investment firm if its head office or registered office were located within the Union”. Section 4 continues to discuss the legal framework applicable to third-country groups and EU intermediary holding companies under CRD V and Directive (EU) 2019/2034 (“IFD”), and Section 5 concludes.<br>
Title: The Luxembourg Third-Country Regimes for Banks, 'Investment Firms' and 'Other PFS'
Description:
Post-Brexit, third-country firms are increasingly interested to provide banking services/activities and investment services/activities in Luxembourg.
The provision of both investment and banking services/activities by third-country firms is largely subject to national law.
<br><br>Directive 2014/65/EU, as amended (“MiFID II”) and Regulation (EU) 600/2014, as amended (“MiFIR”) were designed to provide some uniformity to the requirements in the investment services/activities domain.
Full harmonization is, however, not possible as some of the provisions, namely those relating to the establishment of a branch under MiFID II, are optional.
As a consequence, Luxembourg law provisions that have implemented MiFID II remain relevant as to third-country firms that intend to provide investment services/activities in Luxembourg.
The MiFIR requirements relating to the provision of cross-border services are not optional and are, therefore, directly applicable.
<br><br>Similarly, under the provisions of Directive 2013/36/EU, as amended (“CRD V”), Luxembourg law governs the ability of credit institutions from third countries to establish a branch or to provide cross-border services in Luxembourg.
<br><br>This contribution aims to analyze the Luxembourg third-country regimes that are applicable to non-EU banks and “third-country firms” under the Law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector, as amended (the “LSF”), that are providing such services in Luxembourg.
To that end, this contribution discusses in Section 2 the applicable regulatory framework on the basis of which credit institutions and professionals of the financial sector (“PFS”) other than investment firms from third countries (i.
e.
specialized PFS, support PFS, and data communication service providers within the meaning of the LFS) may perform banking activities/services in Luxembourg.
Section 3 then discusses the recently amended (Luxembourg) third-country regime that is applicable to “third-country firms”, which are “firms that would be a credit institution providing investment services or performing investment activities or an investment firm if its head office or registered office were located within the Union”.
Section 4 continues to discuss the legal framework applicable to third-country groups and EU intermediary holding companies under CRD V and Directive (EU) 2019/2034 (“IFD”), and Section 5 concludes.
<br>.
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Abstract 1644: Progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS)
Abstract 1644: Progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS)
Abstract
Background: PFS is criticized as being not reliably predictive of OS, and statistically significant gains may be clinically insignificant. However, PFS has ...
Proposed Accounting Standard for High Risk Investment
Proposed Accounting Standard for High Risk Investment
The purpose of this paper is to suggest a new Accounting Standard, which details the separate disclosures required for ‘High Risk Investment’ held by the entities; those are not in...
Diversity, National Identity, and Political Participation among Young People in Luxembourg
Diversity, National Identity, and Political Participation among Young People in Luxembourg
Luxembourg is known for its cultural and national diversity. Approximately 48% of the population is foreigners live in Luxembourg. For 15-29-year-olds, this share wasapproximately ...
ACTUAL ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
ACTUAL ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
One of the most important factors of the sustainable and safe development of the national economy is the availability of investment resources in the economy, the establishment of a...
Final progression-free survival, interim overall survival, and biomarker analyses of CHOICE-01: A phase 3 study of toripalimab versus placebo in combination with first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations.
Final progression-free survival, interim overall survival, and biomarker analyses of CHOICE-01: A phase 3 study of toripalimab versus placebo in combination with first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations.
9028 Background: Toripalimab (anti-PD-1) in combination with chemotherapy showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the first-...
Immigrants in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Its Public Security
Immigrants in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Its Public Security
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is one of the smallest European countries – both in terms of area and population. As in the case of the so-called European micro-states (with less tha...
Investing: The Concept and Classification of Schemes with Legal Significance
Investing: The Concept and Classification of Schemes with Legal Significance
Introduction: the theme of investment and investing invisibly but tangibly accompanies a person in modern life. The desire to increase their funds is becoming an urgent need of the...

