Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Federal Lands, Past and Present

View through CrossRef
How did the federal government end up with title to a quarter of the land in a nation with a long-standing distrust of government power, a corresponding faith in individual enterprise, and democratic institutions designed to make government policies reflect its will? While explanation is not justification, an account of their evolution can help make some sense of current federal land policies. In this chapter, I outline the history of federal lands and the shape of the current management regime, indicating what agencies are responsible for what lands under what statutory charters. Readers familiar with these topics will find nothing new here and may wish to skip to the concluding observations. The federal government got into the real-estate business early on. Through a political compromise between the original states, it acquired the old “western lands” between the Appalachians and the Mississippi. During the colonial period, England had rather imprecisely divided the land it claimed in America among its colonies. Charters granted extensive lands beyond the Appalachians to some colonies, sometimes the same lands to different colonies. Connecticut and Massachusetts, for example, claimed the same 26 million acres in the old Northwest (north of the Ohio River, west of the Appalachians). England revoked some of these grants in 1774, but colonies thereby severed from their western lands regarded the War of Independence as a means to regain what had been theirs. States with no historical claims to press wanted to share in what they considered war booty “wrested from the common enemy by the blood and treasure of the thirteen states.” They proposed that the western lands be surrendered to the federal government “to be disposed of for the common good of the United States.” Maryland feared that otherwise it would have to make good on promises of land in exchange for service in the Revolution that the Continental Congress had made to Maryland troops. For the same reason, the national government, such as it was, promoted state cession of western lands: nobody relished the prospect of angry veterans marching on Congress to demand the land they’d been promised.
Title: Federal Lands, Past and Present
Description:
How did the federal government end up with title to a quarter of the land in a nation with a long-standing distrust of government power, a corresponding faith in individual enterprise, and democratic institutions designed to make government policies reflect its will? While explanation is not justification, an account of their evolution can help make some sense of current federal land policies.
In this chapter, I outline the history of federal lands and the shape of the current management regime, indicating what agencies are responsible for what lands under what statutory charters.
Readers familiar with these topics will find nothing new here and may wish to skip to the concluding observations.
The federal government got into the real-estate business early on.
Through a political compromise between the original states, it acquired the old “western lands” between the Appalachians and the Mississippi.
During the colonial period, England had rather imprecisely divided the land it claimed in America among its colonies.
Charters granted extensive lands beyond the Appalachians to some colonies, sometimes the same lands to different colonies.
Connecticut and Massachusetts, for example, claimed the same 26 million acres in the old Northwest (north of the Ohio River, west of the Appalachians).
England revoked some of these grants in 1774, but colonies thereby severed from their western lands regarded the War of Independence as a means to regain what had been theirs.
States with no historical claims to press wanted to share in what they considered war booty “wrested from the common enemy by the blood and treasure of the thirteen states.
” They proposed that the western lands be surrendered to the federal government “to be disposed of for the common good of the United States.
” Maryland feared that otherwise it would have to make good on promises of land in exchange for service in the Revolution that the Continental Congress had made to Maryland troops.
For the same reason, the national government, such as it was, promoted state cession of western lands: nobody relished the prospect of angry veterans marching on Congress to demand the land they’d been promised.

Related Results

Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Scientific and methodological approaches to the classification of land affected by military actions in Ukraine
Scientific and methodological approaches to the classification of land affected by military actions in Ukraine
Abstract.The focus is placed on the necessity of classifying lands and land parcels affected by military actions in Ukraine and establishing restrictions on their use. The study id...
LAND USE OPTIMIZATION IN UKRAINE AT THE STAGE OF LAND MARKET FORMATION
LAND USE OPTIMIZATION IN UKRAINE AT THE STAGE OF LAND MARKET FORMATION
In the context of the reform of the sale of agricultural land, the priority is to optimize land use, which is to find a balance of land that would meet their environmental, economi...
Population stability of natural enemies arthopods in organic mustard planting that planted in organic and mineral lands
Population stability of natural enemies arthopods in organic mustard planting that planted in organic and mineral lands
This study aims to compare the identification results of various types of natural enemy arthropods found in organic mustard grown on organic and mineral lands; analyzing the natura...
STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF SYSTEMIC FACTORS ON THE LEVEL OF LAND USE OF THE REGIONAL NATURE RESERVE FUND
STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF SYSTEMIC FACTORS ON THE LEVEL OF LAND USE OF THE REGIONAL NATURE RESERVE FUND
An urgent issue is the determination of the functional purpose and increasing the efficiency of using the lands of the natural reserve fund. The object of research: lands of the na...
Assessment of the determinants of existing vacant lands in Jos Metropolis, Nigeria
Assessment of the determinants of existing vacant lands in Jos Metropolis, Nigeria
The study analyzed the determinants of existing vacant lands in Jos metropolis, Nigeria. This is based on the understanding of the fact that, though several studies have been carri...
Study of the Ecological and Reclamation Condition of Abandoned Lands and their Development for Sustainable Development Goals
Study of the Ecological and Reclamation Condition of Abandoned Lands and their Development for Sustainable Development Goals
To provide the population with food, it is very important to re-cultivate "abandoned lands" that have been retired from agricultural use. Conversion of arable lan...
OS SERVIDORES PÚBLICOS MUNICIPAIS
OS SERVIDORES PÚBLICOS MUNICIPAIS
I. Organização do funcionalismo municipal1. A Autonomia dos Municípios e a organização de seu funcionalismo — A Constituição Federal assegura, aos Municípios, a autonomia de autogo...

Back to Top