Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Relative bioavailability of an extemporaneously prepared aprepitant oral suspension in healthy adults
View through CrossRef
Purpose
Use of aprepitant for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in patients unable to swallow capsules is hindered by the lack of a commercially available oral liquid formulation in many jurisdictions. A stable oral suspension can be extemporaneously prepared using commercially available capsules. We aimed to determine the bioavailability of this aprepitant suspension relative to the capsule.
Methods
This two-period crossover study enrolled 17 healthy adult volunteers. Volunteers received a single 125 mg aprepitant dose during each study period. Order of formulation presentation (capsule vs suspension first) was randomized. Thirteen blood samples were collected over a 48-h period. Aprepitant plasma concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Relative bioavailability was defined as the geometric least squares mean ratio for area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity of the aprepitant suspension versus the capsule. Bioequivalence, defined as per Health Canada guidelines, was assessed as a secondary aim.
Results
Relative bioavailability of the aprepitant suspension was 82.3% (90% CI: 69.09-98.00%). Bioequivalence was not established: geometric least squares mean ratios (suspension/capsule) for AUC time zero to 48 h and maximum concentration were 87.8% (90% CI: 75.48–102.16%) and 86.1% (90% CI: 75.59–98.16%), respectively. No serious adverse events were observed.
Conclusions
With a relative bioavailability of 82.3%, the extemporaneous aprepitant oral suspension was well-absorbed relative to the capsule. Though not bioequivalent to the oral capsule, the clinical use of this aprepitant oral suspension in adult and pediatric patients unable to swallow capsules is likely to be effective and safe.
Title: Relative bioavailability of an extemporaneously prepared aprepitant oral suspension in healthy adults
Description:
Purpose
Use of aprepitant for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in patients unable to swallow capsules is hindered by the lack of a commercially available oral liquid formulation in many jurisdictions.
A stable oral suspension can be extemporaneously prepared using commercially available capsules.
We aimed to determine the bioavailability of this aprepitant suspension relative to the capsule.
Methods
This two-period crossover study enrolled 17 healthy adult volunteers.
Volunteers received a single 125 mg aprepitant dose during each study period.
Order of formulation presentation (capsule vs suspension first) was randomized.
Thirteen blood samples were collected over a 48-h period.
Aprepitant plasma concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy.
Relative bioavailability was defined as the geometric least squares mean ratio for area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity of the aprepitant suspension versus the capsule.
Bioequivalence, defined as per Health Canada guidelines, was assessed as a secondary aim.
Results
Relative bioavailability of the aprepitant suspension was 82.
3% (90% CI: 69.
09-98.
00%).
Bioequivalence was not established: geometric least squares mean ratios (suspension/capsule) for AUC time zero to 48 h and maximum concentration were 87.
8% (90% CI: 75.
48–102.
16%) and 86.
1% (90% CI: 75.
59–98.
16%), respectively.
No serious adverse events were observed.
Conclusions
With a relative bioavailability of 82.
3%, the extemporaneous aprepitant oral suspension was well-absorbed relative to the capsule.
Though not bioequivalent to the oral capsule, the clinical use of this aprepitant oral suspension in adult and pediatric patients unable to swallow capsules is likely to be effective and safe.
Related Results
Aprepitant Use in Pediatric Cyclical Vomiting Syndrome: A Systematic Review
Aprepitant Use in Pediatric Cyclical Vomiting Syndrome: A Systematic Review
Background: Cyclical vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a disorder of gut–brain interaction characterized by recurrent, stereotyped episodes of intense nausea and vomiting with return to b...
Aprepitant Inhibits JNK and p38/MAPK to Attenuate Inflammation in Microglia and Suppresses Inflammatory Pain
Aprepitant Inhibits JNK and p38/MAPK to Attenuate Inflammation in Microglia and Suppresses Inflammatory Pain
Abstract
Background: Substance P (SP) contributes to the pathogenesis of pain by acting on neurokinin‐1 receptor (NK-1R), specialized sensory neurons that detect noxious st...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Aprepitant for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pruritus
Aprepitant for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pruritus
Chronic pruritus is a difficult condition to treat and is associated with several comorbidities, including insomnia, depression, and decreased quality of life. Treatment for chroni...
The Effect of SP/NK1R on the Expression and Activity of Catalase and Superoxide Dismutase in Glioblastoma Cancer Cells
The Effect of SP/NK1R on the Expression and Activity of Catalase and Superoxide Dismutase in Glioblastoma Cancer Cells
Introduction. Glioblastoma is the most malignant brain tumor with different therapeutic protocols, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Substance P (SP), a peptide re...
Comparison of aprepitant and dexamethasone versus metoclorpramide and dexamethasone for prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Comparison of aprepitant and dexamethasone versus metoclorpramide and dexamethasone for prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of aprepitant and dexamethasone versus metoclopramide and dexamethasone combination in prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting in female...
Quality Assessment of Extemporaneously Compounded Carvedilol Oral Suspension for Pediatric Patients at the Hospital Pharmacy
Quality Assessment of Extemporaneously Compounded Carvedilol Oral Suspension for Pediatric Patients at the Hospital Pharmacy
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate different quality control parameters and the stability of the carvedilol compounded extemporaneous suspensions over three months at room...
The use of aprepitant in a case of refractory nausea and vomiting
The use of aprepitant in a case of refractory nausea and vomiting
Background:
This case report describes a patient whose refractory nausea and vomiting significantly improved with the use of aprepitant, a neurokinin receptor a...

