Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Monitoring for PERV Following Xenotransplantation
View through CrossRef
Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are integrated in the genome of all pigs. PERV-A, PERV-B and PERV-C can be released as infectious virus particles and PERV-A and PERV-B can infect human cells in culture. PERV-C does not infect human cells, but high-titer recombinant PERV-A/C can infect them. Retroviruses are able to induce immunosuppression and/or tumors in the infected host. Numerous methods have been developed to study PERV in donor pigs. No PERV infections were observed in infection experiments as well as in preclinical and clinical xenotransplantation trials. Despite this, several strategies have been developed to prevent PERV infection of the recipient. PCR-based and immunological methods are required to screen xenotransplant recipients. Since the proviruses are integrated into the pig genome, PERV infection has to be distinguished from microchimerism, e.g., the presence of pig cells in the recipient, which is common in xenotransplantation. Sensitive PCR methods using pig short interspersed nuclear elements (SINE) sequences allow to detect pig cells easily. Virus infection can also be detected by an increase of viral genomic or mRNA in human cells. The method of choice, however, is to screen for specific antibodies against PERV using different recombinant PERV proteins, purified viruses or peptides.
Title: Monitoring for PERV Following Xenotransplantation
Description:
Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are integrated in the genome of all pigs.
PERV-A, PERV-B and PERV-C can be released as infectious virus particles and PERV-A and PERV-B can infect human cells in culture.
PERV-C does not infect human cells, but high-titer recombinant PERV-A/C can infect them.
Retroviruses are able to induce immunosuppression and/or tumors in the infected host.
Numerous methods have been developed to study PERV in donor pigs.
No PERV infections were observed in infection experiments as well as in preclinical and clinical xenotransplantation trials.
Despite this, several strategies have been developed to prevent PERV infection of the recipient.
PCR-based and immunological methods are required to screen xenotransplant recipients.
Since the proviruses are integrated into the pig genome, PERV infection has to be distinguished from microchimerism, e.
g.
, the presence of pig cells in the recipient, which is common in xenotransplantation.
Sensitive PCR methods using pig short interspersed nuclear elements (SINE) sequences allow to detect pig cells easily.
Virus infection can also be detected by an increase of viral genomic or mRNA in human cells.
The method of choice, however, is to screen for specific antibodies against PERV using different recombinant PERV proteins, purified viruses or peptides.
Related Results
Distribution Of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) Variants In Domestic And Feral Pig
Distribution Of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) Variants In Domestic And Feral Pig
Xenotransplantation is considered an alternative to allotransplantation to relieve the current shortage of human organs. Due to their similar size and physiology, the organs of pig...
Requirements of informed‐consent to xenotransplantation: a qualitative interview study
Requirements of informed‐consent to xenotransplantation: a qualitative interview study
BackgroundThe aim is to establish xenotransplantation as a possible alternative to allotransplantation. The clinical application requires that patients give their informed consent ...
Variation of Host Cell Tropism of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses Expressed in Chinese Banna Minipig Inbred
Variation of Host Cell Tropism of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses Expressed in Chinese Banna Minipig Inbred
A serious donor-organ shortage urges the use of animal donors to treat a wide appropriate variety of major health problems including organ failure and diabetes. However, the promis...
Xenotransplantation public perceptions: rather cells than organs
Xenotransplantation public perceptions: rather cells than organs
Omnell Persson M, Persson NH, Ranstam J, Hermerén G. Xenotransplantation public perceptions, rather cells than organs. Xenotransplantation 2003; 10: 72–79. © Blackwell Munksgaard, ...
Protéines à motif tripartite (TRIM) chez le porc (Sus scrofa) et réplication du rétrovirus endogène porcin
Protéines à motif tripartite (TRIM) chez le porc (Sus scrofa) et réplication du rétrovirus endogène porcin
Les études des interactions entre cellules hôtes et rétrovirus ont conduit à définir le concept de restriction virale dont les facteurs constituent une part de l'immunité innée des...
Xenotransplantation in China: Past, Present, and Future
Xenotransplantation in China: Past, Present, and Future
ABSTRACTOrgan failure poses a substantial global health challenge, and xenotransplantation emerges as one of the most promising avenues to mitigate the critical shortage of donor o...
Virus Safety of Xenotransplantation
Virus Safety of Xenotransplantation
The practice of xenotransplantation using pig islet cells or organs is under development to alleviate the shortage of human donor islet cells or organs for the treatment of diabete...
Complement networks in gene-edited pig xenotransplantation: enhancing transplant success and addressing organ shortage
Complement networks in gene-edited pig xenotransplantation: enhancing transplant success and addressing organ shortage
AbstractThe shortage of organs for transplantation emphasizes the urgent need for alternative solutions. Xenotransplantation has emerged as a promising option due to the greater av...

