Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Craniometric variation and the ancestry of modern humans

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objectives Ancient and contemporary DNA provide information about geographic variation in the ancestry of present‐day humans. All living populations have ancestry from early Homo sapiens originating in sub‐Saharan Africa. Populations of Eurasian descent also have a small amount of Neandertal ancestry. This study examines whether craniometric distances between recent modern human samples reflect this geographic variation in ancestry. Among recent modern humans, Eurasians are expected to be more similar to Neandertals, whereas both sub‐Saharan Africans and Eurasians are expected to be equidistant from early H. sapiens . Materials and Methods Data on 33 craniometric traits from 2524 recent modern humans were compared with data from the literature for Neandertals and early H. sapiens . Mahalanobis distances were computed for each modern specimen to both the Neandertal and early H. sapiens means. These distances were examined for differences between recent humans from sub‐Saharan Africa ( N  = 373) and those of Eurasian descent ( N  = 2151). Results Eurasians as a group are significantly closer than sub‐Saharan Africans to Neandertals. There is no significant difference between the distances of sub‐Saharan Africans and Eurasians to early H. sapiens . Discussion The differences between sub‐Saharan Africans and Eurasians for both Neandertals and early H. sapiens are as expected. Although there has been geographic differentiation among recent modern humans, including differences in Neandertal admixture, these differences have not affected overall similarity of recent modern sub‐Saharan Africans and Eurasians to the earliest samples of H. sapiens .
Title: Craniometric variation and the ancestry of modern humans
Description:
Abstract Objectives Ancient and contemporary DNA provide information about geographic variation in the ancestry of present‐day humans.
All living populations have ancestry from early Homo sapiens originating in sub‐Saharan Africa.
Populations of Eurasian descent also have a small amount of Neandertal ancestry.
This study examines whether craniometric distances between recent modern human samples reflect this geographic variation in ancestry.
Among recent modern humans, Eurasians are expected to be more similar to Neandertals, whereas both sub‐Saharan Africans and Eurasians are expected to be equidistant from early H.
sapiens .
Materials and Methods Data on 33 craniometric traits from 2524 recent modern humans were compared with data from the literature for Neandertals and early H.
sapiens .
Mahalanobis distances were computed for each modern specimen to both the Neandertal and early H.
sapiens means.
These distances were examined for differences between recent humans from sub‐Saharan Africa ( N  = 373) and those of Eurasian descent ( N  = 2151).
Results Eurasians as a group are significantly closer than sub‐Saharan Africans to Neandertals.
There is no significant difference between the distances of sub‐Saharan Africans and Eurasians to early H.
sapiens .
Discussion The differences between sub‐Saharan Africans and Eurasians for both Neandertals and early H.
sapiens are as expected.
Although there has been geographic differentiation among recent modern humans, including differences in Neandertal admixture, these differences have not affected overall similarity of recent modern sub‐Saharan Africans and Eurasians to the earliest samples of H.
sapiens .

Related Results

Craniometric variation among modern human populations
Craniometric variation among modern human populations
AbstractPrevious studies of genetic markers and mitochondrial DNA have found that the amount of variation among major geographic groupings of Homo sapiens is relatively low, accoun...
Abstract 1166: Leveraging existing data to identify ancestry-associated features across multiple cancer types
Abstract 1166: Leveraging existing data to identify ancestry-associated features across multiple cancer types
Abstract People with different ancestries inherit different risks and encounter different environmental exposures resulting in different somatic profiles. A lack of ...
Boas and beyond: Migration and craniometric variation
Boas and beyond: Migration and craniometric variation
AbstractMigration is expected to affect craniometric variation in three ways: 1) movement into a different environment leading to developmental plasticity; 2) movement into a diffe...
Abstract 1599: Determining patient ancestry based on targeted tumor comprehensive genomic profiling
Abstract 1599: Determining patient ancestry based on targeted tumor comprehensive genomic profiling
Abstract Background. Cancer gene mutations exhibit mutation patterns of prevalence that vary across different ancestry groups. For example, EGFR variants are more fr...
Data from Blood Vitamin D Levels in Relation to Genetic Estimation of African Ancestry
Data from Blood Vitamin D Levels in Relation to Genetic Estimation of African Ancestry
<div>Abstract<p><b>Background:</b> African-Americans generally have lower circulating levels of 25 hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] than Whites, attributed to ski...
Data from Blood Vitamin D Levels in Relation to Genetic Estimation of African Ancestry
Data from Blood Vitamin D Levels in Relation to Genetic Estimation of African Ancestry
<div>Abstract<p><b>Background:</b> African-Americans generally have lower circulating levels of 25 hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] than Whites, attributed to ski...
African Ancestry vs. Creatine Kinase to Predict Hypertension Control: Time for a Change?
African Ancestry vs. Creatine Kinase to Predict Hypertension Control: Time for a Change?
Abstract Background African ancestry patients are considered separately in hypertension guidelines because of more severe hypert...

Back to Top