Age and the Egocentric Constraint on Coordination Stability: An Exploratory Report

The stability of coordinated rhythmic movements is primarily affected by the target relative phase. Relative phase can be identified in each of two frames of reference (an external, allocentric frame and a body-centred, egocentric frame) and both constrain stability. In the allocentric frame, coordinations that involve isodirectional movement (0° mean relative phase) are more stable than those that do not. In the egocentric frame, coordinations that involve simultaneous use of homologous muscles (in-phase) are more stable than those that do not. The origin of the allocentric constraint is the visual perception of relative phase. The origin of this egocentric frame of reference is still unclear, although it is typically discussed in terms of neural crosstalk. Pickavance, Azmoodeh & Wilson (2018) proposed that the egocentric constraint is also perceptual, based in the haptic perception of relative phase. As an initial step in pursuing this hypothesis, this exploratory report examines some data from two recent studies on the effect of ageing on performing and learning coordinated rhythmic movements. We show that participants in their 20s show a strong egocentric effect in their coordination production, while this disappears in participants in their 60s. Participants in their 50s show an intermediate effect. We propose that a perceptual hypothesis is the best explanation of this age-related change, and lay out how to pursue hypothesis-driven tests in the future.