Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The EU Justice Scoreboard - Judicial Evaluation as a New Governance Tool
View through CrossRef
The EU Justice Scoreboard is the Commission’s latest initiative to evaluate Member States’ justice systems. The paper explores the features of the Justice Scoreboard, the reasoning behind its creation, as well as its methodology and data sources. Although the Scoreboard was initially conceived as a non-binding tool comparing data on national courts’ performance in civil and commercial matters, a deeper analysis reveals that it goes beyond a simple monitoring and evaluating exercise. With its overemphasised economic focus and its strong policy dimension the Scoreboard is rather a governance mechanism that pushes for specific reforms in Member States. At the same time, the Scoreboard marks a transition from supranational harmonization to softer methods of policy coordination through monitoring and evaluation. Although it is still too early to evaluate whether this transition anticipates a paradigm shift in the Commission’s policy towards EU Justice, the Scoreboard (after some commendable improvements in methodology and data presentation) holds a remarkable unexpressed potential for the future and could work as a basis for experimenting with new governance tools in the area of EU Justice.
Title: The EU Justice Scoreboard - Judicial Evaluation as a New Governance Tool
Description:
The EU Justice Scoreboard is the Commission’s latest initiative to evaluate Member States’ justice systems.
The paper explores the features of the Justice Scoreboard, the reasoning behind its creation, as well as its methodology and data sources.
Although the Scoreboard was initially conceived as a non-binding tool comparing data on national courts’ performance in civil and commercial matters, a deeper analysis reveals that it goes beyond a simple monitoring and evaluating exercise.
With its overemphasised economic focus and its strong policy dimension the Scoreboard is rather a governance mechanism that pushes for specific reforms in Member States.
At the same time, the Scoreboard marks a transition from supranational harmonization to softer methods of policy coordination through monitoring and evaluation.
Although it is still too early to evaluate whether this transition anticipates a paradigm shift in the Commission’s policy towards EU Justice, the Scoreboard (after some commendable improvements in methodology and data presentation) holds a remarkable unexpressed potential for the future and could work as a basis for experimenting with new governance tools in the area of EU Justice.
Related Results
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
App-Based Volleyball Scoreboard Performance Evaluation
App-Based Volleyball Scoreboard Performance Evaluation
Study purpose. This research aims to develop and evaluate an application-based volleyball scoreboard game device designed to facilitate the process of recording and managing scores...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract
The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Automation of Cricket Scoreboard by Recognizing Umpire Gestures
Automation of Cricket Scoreboard by Recognizing Umpire Gestures
Imagine how tiresome it is for the scorers to update the scoreboard after each ball delivery during a cricket match. They need to be alert during any point in the match, watch ever...
The Judicial Administrative Power
The Judicial Administrative Power
Article III of the Constitution confines the “judicial Power of the United States” to the adjudication of “cases” and “controversies.” In practice, however, federal judges exercise...
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Smart manufacturing has been developed since the introduction of Industry 4.0. It consists of resource sharing and networking, predictive engineering, and material and data analyti...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Substantive justice is an idea of justice that seeks to present it comprehensively and completely in society. Substantive justice in this case does not only interpret the law as li...

