Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Modernity and colonialism: on the historical-sociological blindness of the theories of modernity
View through CrossRef
This paper criticizes the historical-sociological blindness found in contemporary theories of modernity (as in those of Weber and Habermas) in order both to construct a sociological model for the process of Western modernization and to formulate a normative notion of cultural modernity which can favor the development of a critical social theory which is correlatively sociological and philosophical. The historical-sociological blindness regarding the theoretical-political reconstruction of the process of Western modernization is basically characterized by the separation between European cultural modernity and European social-economic modernization, which leads to the notion that European culture is not directly linked to social and economic modernization. Likewise, Western modernization is fundamentally an autonomous and endogenous constitutive process, bearing no correlation with other cultures-societies, as seen in the lack of references to the fact of colonialism. Such a separation between culture and social systems or institutions results in European cultural modernity becoming a pure normative concept with no direct relations to both social and economic modernization and colonialism. That is the reason why, according to Habermas, a critical and universalistic normative concept both to a critical social theory and its political praxis, as to international politics, is allowed. The central argument of this paper is that the theories of modernity cannot provide a normative paradigm to a critical social theory based on cultural modernity due to this historical-sociological blindness. Therefore, the elaboration of a normative concept for critical social theory should start by unveiling, denouncing and deconstructing the historical-sociological blindness of these contemporary theories of modernity.
Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo
Title: Modernity and colonialism: on the historical-sociological blindness of the theories of modernity
Description:
This paper criticizes the historical-sociological blindness found in contemporary theories of modernity (as in those of Weber and Habermas) in order both to construct a sociological model for the process of Western modernization and to formulate a normative notion of cultural modernity which can favor the development of a critical social theory which is correlatively sociological and philosophical.
The historical-sociological blindness regarding the theoretical-political reconstruction of the process of Western modernization is basically characterized by the separation between European cultural modernity and European social-economic modernization, which leads to the notion that European culture is not directly linked to social and economic modernization.
Likewise, Western modernization is fundamentally an autonomous and endogenous constitutive process, bearing no correlation with other cultures-societies, as seen in the lack of references to the fact of colonialism.
Such a separation between culture and social systems or institutions results in European cultural modernity becoming a pure normative concept with no direct relations to both social and economic modernization and colonialism.
That is the reason why, according to Habermas, a critical and universalistic normative concept both to a critical social theory and its political praxis, as to international politics, is allowed.
The central argument of this paper is that the theories of modernity cannot provide a normative paradigm to a critical social theory based on cultural modernity due to this historical-sociological blindness.
Therefore, the elaboration of a normative concept for critical social theory should start by unveiling, denouncing and deconstructing the historical-sociological blindness of these contemporary theories of modernity.
Related Results
Theology of Blindness in the Hebrew Scriptures
Theology of Blindness in the Hebrew Scriptures
Problem: A number of passages in the Hebrew Scriptures discuss blindness. Scholars have studied them individually, but not with a view to developing a theology of blindness. The pu...
Colonialism
Colonialism
Few topics in the discipline of anthropology are as important, and controversial, as colonialism. The historical origins of anthropology are rooted in the colonial enterprise, thus...
When I Leave… Exploring the Being and Appearance of Blindness
When I Leave… Exploring the Being and Appearance of Blindness
This work explores the conventional ways that blindness and sight are differentiated. It makes use of this differentiation to establish first, how it imagines that such a differenc...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Settler Colonialism and African Americans
Settler Colonialism and African Americans
Emerging from the ranks of white settler scholars in Australia and New Zealand in the mid-2000s, the discourse of settler colonialism has become the “official” idiolect with substa...
Settler Colonialism
Settler Colonialism
Settler colonialism is a specific form of colonialism where settlers come to permanently inhabit and exert control over a territory. Unlike other forms of colonialism, which often ...
Metacognitive judgements of change detection predict change blindness
Metacognitive judgements of change detection predict change blindness
People tend to think they are not susceptible to change blindness and overestimate their ability to detect salient changes in scenes. Yet, despite their overconfidence, are individ...
Mortality in Blind Subjects
Mortality in Blind Subjects
<i>Background:</i> Previous studies indicated that mortality is increased in blind subjects. However, no detailed analysis with respect to causes of blindness and the e...

