Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Modernity and colonialism: on the historical-sociological blindness of the theories of modernity
View through CrossRef
This paper criticizes the historical-sociological blindness found in contemporary theories of modernity (as in those of Weber and Habermas) in order both to construct a sociological model for the process of Western modernization and to formulate a normative notion of cultural modernity which can favor the development of a critical social theory which is correlatively sociological and philosophical. The historical-sociological blindness regarding the theoretical-political reconstruction of the process of Western modernization is basically characterized by the separation between European cultural modernity and European social-economic modernization, which leads to the notion that European culture is not directly linked to social and economic modernization. Likewise, Western modernization is fundamentally an autonomous and endogenous constitutive process, bearing no correlation with other cultures-societies, as seen in the lack of references to the fact of colonialism. Such a separation between culture and social systems or institutions results in European cultural modernity becoming a pure normative concept with no direct relations to both social and economic modernization and colonialism. That is the reason why, according to Habermas, a critical and universalistic normative concept both to a critical social theory and its political praxis, as to international politics, is allowed. The central argument of this paper is that the theories of modernity cannot provide a normative paradigm to a critical social theory based on cultural modernity due to this historical-sociological blindness. Therefore, the elaboration of a normative concept for critical social theory should start by unveiling, denouncing and deconstructing the historical-sociological blindness of these contemporary theories of modernity.
Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo
Title: Modernity and colonialism: on the historical-sociological blindness of the theories of modernity
Description:
This paper criticizes the historical-sociological blindness found in contemporary theories of modernity (as in those of Weber and Habermas) in order both to construct a sociological model for the process of Western modernization and to formulate a normative notion of cultural modernity which can favor the development of a critical social theory which is correlatively sociological and philosophical.
The historical-sociological blindness regarding the theoretical-political reconstruction of the process of Western modernization is basically characterized by the separation between European cultural modernity and European social-economic modernization, which leads to the notion that European culture is not directly linked to social and economic modernization.
Likewise, Western modernization is fundamentally an autonomous and endogenous constitutive process, bearing no correlation with other cultures-societies, as seen in the lack of references to the fact of colonialism.
Such a separation between culture and social systems or institutions results in European cultural modernity becoming a pure normative concept with no direct relations to both social and economic modernization and colonialism.
That is the reason why, according to Habermas, a critical and universalistic normative concept both to a critical social theory and its political praxis, as to international politics, is allowed.
The central argument of this paper is that the theories of modernity cannot provide a normative paradigm to a critical social theory based on cultural modernity due to this historical-sociological blindness.
Therefore, the elaboration of a normative concept for critical social theory should start by unveiling, denouncing and deconstructing the historical-sociological blindness of these contemporary theories of modernity.
Related Results
Theology of Blindness in the Hebrew Scriptures
Theology of Blindness in the Hebrew Scriptures
Problem: A number of passages in the Hebrew Scriptures discuss blindness. Scholars have studied them individually, but not with a view to developing a theology of blindness. The pu...
Colonialism
Colonialism
Few topics in the discipline of anthropology are as important, and controversial, as colonialism. The historical origins of anthropology are rooted in the colonial enterprise, thus...
When I Leave… Exploring the Being and Appearance of Blindness
When I Leave… Exploring the Being and Appearance of Blindness
This work explores the conventional ways that blindness and sight are differentiated. It makes use of this differentiation to establish first, how it imagines that such a differenc...
Settler Colonialism and African Americans
Settler Colonialism and African Americans
Emerging from the ranks of white settler scholars in Australia and New Zealand in the mid-2000s, the discourse of settler colonialism has become the “official” idiolect with substa...
Metacognitive judgements of change detection predict change blindness
Metacognitive judgements of change detection predict change blindness
People tend to think they are not susceptible to change blindness and overestimate their ability to detect salient changes in scenes. Yet, despite their overconfidence, are individ...
THE CATEGORY OF BLINDNESS IN THE RECEPTIVE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE (BASED ON ELEONOR PORTER’S NOVEL “DAWN”)
THE CATEGORY OF BLINDNESS IN THE RECEPTIVE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE (BASED ON ELEONOR PORTER’S NOVEL “DAWN”)
Research task. Given the lacunar status of blindness within receptive research paradigms, the primary objective of this study is to develop new interpretative strategies for unders...
Blindness Above And Below The Poverty Line: Reflections from Sofala, Mozambique
Blindness Above And Below The Poverty Line: Reflections from Sofala, Mozambique
Objective: Although the correlation between visual impairment and poverty has been established, economic assessment is not a standard component of blindness surveys. The purpose of...
Modernity: A Way of Urbanism -- Banaras in Indigenous Trans-Formations
Modernity: A Way of Urbanism -- Banaras in Indigenous Trans-Formations
Tradition of tomorrow is the modernity of today andToday’s tradition was the modernity of yesterday.
Modernity, as a process and not as an output, is a derivative of transfor...

