Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Empirical upscaling of OzFlux eddy covariance for high-resolution monitoring of terrestrial carbon uptake in Australia
View through CrossRef
Abstract. We develop high-resolution (1 km) estimates of gross primary
productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem exchange
(NEE) over the Australian continent for the period January 2003 to June 2022
by empirical upscaling of flux tower measurements. We compare our estimates
with nine other products that cover the three broad categories that define
current methods for estimating the terrestrial carbon cycle and assess if
consiliences between datasets can point to the correct dynamics of
Australia's carbon cycle. Our results indicate that regional empirical
upscaling greatly improves upon the existing global empirical upscaling
efforts, outperforms process-based models, and agrees much better with the
dynamics of CO2 flux over Australia as estimated by two regional
atmospheric inversions. Our nearly 20-year estimates of terrestrial carbon
fluxes revealed that Australia is a strong net carbon sink of −0.44 PgC yr−1 (interquartile range, IQR = 0.42 PgC yr−1) on average, with an inter-annual variability of
0.18 PgC yr−1 and
an average seasonal amplitude of 0.85 PgC yr−1. Annual mean carbon uptake
estimated from other methods ranged considerably, while carbon flux
anomalies showed much better agreement between methods. NEE anomalies were
predominately driven by cumulative rainfall deficits and surpluses,
resulting in larger anomalous responses from GPP than ER. In contrast, we
show that the long-term average seasonal cycle is dictated more by the
variability in ER than GPP, resulting in peak carbon uptake typically
occurring during the cooler, drier austral autumn and winter months. This
new estimate of Australia's terrestrial carbon cycle provides a benchmark
for assessment against land surface model simulations and a means for
monitoring of Australia's terrestrial carbon cycle at an unprecedented
high resolution. We call this new estimate of Australia's terrestrial carbon
cycle “AusEFlux” (Australian Empirical Fluxes).
Title: Empirical upscaling of OzFlux eddy covariance for high-resolution monitoring of terrestrial carbon uptake in Australia
Description:
Abstract.
We develop high-resolution (1 km) estimates of gross primary
productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem exchange
(NEE) over the Australian continent for the period January 2003 to June 2022
by empirical upscaling of flux tower measurements.
We compare our estimates
with nine other products that cover the three broad categories that define
current methods for estimating the terrestrial carbon cycle and assess if
consiliences between datasets can point to the correct dynamics of
Australia's carbon cycle.
Our results indicate that regional empirical
upscaling greatly improves upon the existing global empirical upscaling
efforts, outperforms process-based models, and agrees much better with the
dynamics of CO2 flux over Australia as estimated by two regional
atmospheric inversions.
Our nearly 20-year estimates of terrestrial carbon
fluxes revealed that Australia is a strong net carbon sink of −0.
44 PgC yr−1 (interquartile range, IQR = 0.
42 PgC yr−1) on average, with an inter-annual variability of
0.
18 PgC yr−1 and
an average seasonal amplitude of 0.
85 PgC yr−1.
Annual mean carbon uptake
estimated from other methods ranged considerably, while carbon flux
anomalies showed much better agreement between methods.
NEE anomalies were
predominately driven by cumulative rainfall deficits and surpluses,
resulting in larger anomalous responses from GPP than ER.
In contrast, we
show that the long-term average seasonal cycle is dictated more by the
variability in ER than GPP, resulting in peak carbon uptake typically
occurring during the cooler, drier austral autumn and winter months.
This
new estimate of Australia's terrestrial carbon cycle provides a benchmark
for assessment against land surface model simulations and a means for
monitoring of Australia's terrestrial carbon cycle at an unprecedented
high resolution.
We call this new estimate of Australia's terrestrial carbon
cycle “AusEFlux” (Australian Empirical Fluxes).
Related Results
Low-cost eddy covariance: a case study of evapotranspiration over agroforestry in Germany
Low-cost eddy covariance: a case study of evapotranspiration over agroforestry in Germany
Abstract. Eddy covariance has evolved as the method of choice for measurements of the ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of water vapour, sensible heat and trace gases. Under ideal cond...
Empirical upscaling of OzFlux eddy covariance for high-resolution monitoring of terrestrial carbon uptake in Australia
Empirical upscaling of OzFlux eddy covariance for high-resolution monitoring of terrestrial carbon uptake in Australia
Abstract. We develop high resolution (1 km) estimates of Gross Primary Productivity (GPP), Ecosystem Respiration (ER) and Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) over the Australian continent...
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
Abstract. Across the world, nature-triggered disasters fuelled by climate change are worsening. Some two billion people have been affected by the consequences of natural hazards ov...
Proper Selection of Upscaling Techniques for Different Production Processes
Proper Selection of Upscaling Techniques for Different Production Processes
Abstract
One main challenge in reservoir modeling is the computational costs of flow simulation. Although computer power has significantly increased in the past few ...
Empirical upscaling of OzFlux eddy covariance for accurate, high-resolution monitoring of terrestrial carbon and water fluxes in Australia.
Empirical upscaling of OzFlux eddy covariance for accurate, high-resolution monitoring of terrestrial carbon and water fluxes in Australia.
We discuss the development of high-resolution (1 km) estimates of terrestrial carbon and water fluxes over the Australian continent by empirical upscaling of a regional n...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Using Eddy Covariance Method in Disciplines beyond Micrometeorology for Scientific, Regulatory, and Commercial Applications
Using Eddy Covariance Method in Disciplines beyond Micrometeorology for Scientific, Regulatory, and Commercial Applications
<p>The Eddy Covariance method is a micrometeorological technique of high-speed measurements of water vapor, gases, heat, and momentum transport within the atmospheric...
Elastic Interaction between a Mesoscale Eddy-Pair and a Cyclonic Eddy
Elastic Interaction between a Mesoscale Eddy-Pair and a Cyclonic Eddy
We investigate numerically the elastic interaction between an eddy-pair
and an axisymmetrical cyclonic eddy in inviscid isochoric
two-dimensional (2D), as well as in three-dimensio...

