Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Lost in Translation: The Pitfalls of Ensembl Gene Annotations Between Human Genome Assemblies and Their Impact on Diagnostics
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background:The GRCh37 human genome assembly is still widely used in genomics despite the fact an updated human genome assembly (GRCh38) has been available for many years. A particular issue with relevant ramifications for clinical genetics currently is the case of the GRCh37 Ensembl gene annotations which has been archived, and thus not updated, since 2013. These Ensembl GRCh37 gene annotations are just as ubiquitous as the former assembly and are the default gene models used and preferred by the majority of genomic projects internationally. In this study, we highlight the issue of genes with discrepant annotations, that have been recognized as protein coding in the new but not the old assembly. These genes are ignored by all genomic resources that still rely on the archived and outdated gene annotations. Moreover, the majority if not all of these discrepant genes (DGs) are automatically discarded and ignored by all variant prioritization tools that rely on the GRCh37 Ensembl gene annotations.Methods:We performed bioinformatics analysis identifying Ensembl genes with discrepant annotations between the two most recent human genome assemblies, hg37, hg38, respectively. Clinical and phenotype gene curations have been obtained and compared for this gene set. Furthermore, matching RefSeq transcripts have also been collated and analyzed. ٌResults:We found hundreds of genes (N=267) that were reclassified as “protein-coding” in the new hg38 assembly. Notably, 169 of these genes also had a discrepant HGNC gene symbol between the two assemblies.Most genes had RefSeq matches (N=199/267) including all the genes with defined phenotypes in Ensembl genes GRCh38 assembly (N=10). However, many protein-coding genes remain missing from the current known RefSeq gene models (N=68)Conclusion: We found many clinically relevant genes in this group of neglected genes and we anticipate that many more will be found relevant in the future. For these genes, the inaccurate label of “non-protein-coding” hinders the possibility of identifying any causal sequence variants that overlap them. In addition, Important additional annotations such as evolutionary constraint metrics are also not calculated for these genes for the same reason, further relegating them into oblivion.
Title: Lost in Translation: The Pitfalls of Ensembl Gene Annotations Between Human Genome Assemblies and Their Impact on Diagnostics
Description:
Abstract
Background:The GRCh37 human genome assembly is still widely used in genomics despite the fact an updated human genome assembly (GRCh38) has been available for many years.
A particular issue with relevant ramifications for clinical genetics currently is the case of the GRCh37 Ensembl gene annotations which has been archived, and thus not updated, since 2013.
These Ensembl GRCh37 gene annotations are just as ubiquitous as the former assembly and are the default gene models used and preferred by the majority of genomic projects internationally.
In this study, we highlight the issue of genes with discrepant annotations, that have been recognized as protein coding in the new but not the old assembly.
These genes are ignored by all genomic resources that still rely on the archived and outdated gene annotations.
Moreover, the majority if not all of these discrepant genes (DGs) are automatically discarded and ignored by all variant prioritization tools that rely on the GRCh37 Ensembl gene annotations.
Methods:We performed bioinformatics analysis identifying Ensembl genes with discrepant annotations between the two most recent human genome assemblies, hg37, hg38, respectively.
Clinical and phenotype gene curations have been obtained and compared for this gene set.
Furthermore, matching RefSeq transcripts have also been collated and analyzed.
ٌResults:We found hundreds of genes (N=267) that were reclassified as “protein-coding” in the new hg38 assembly.
Notably, 169 of these genes also had a discrepant HGNC gene symbol between the two assemblies.
Most genes had RefSeq matches (N=199/267) including all the genes with defined phenotypes in Ensembl genes GRCh38 assembly (N=10).
However, many protein-coding genes remain missing from the current known RefSeq gene models (N=68)Conclusion: We found many clinically relevant genes in this group of neglected genes and we anticipate that many more will be found relevant in the future.
For these genes, the inaccurate label of “non-protein-coding” hinders the possibility of identifying any causal sequence variants that overlap them.
In addition, Important additional annotations such as evolutionary constraint metrics are also not calculated for these genes for the same reason, further relegating them into oblivion.
Related Results
Gene function finding through cross-organism ensemble learning
Gene function finding through cross-organism ensemble learning
Abstract
Background
Structured biological information about genes and proteins is a valuable resource to improve discovery and understanding of comp...
Fish annotation in Ensembl
Fish annotation in Ensembl
The actinopterygians, or ray-finned fish, account for nearly half of all extant vertebrates and exhibit a high level of phenotypic diversity. Previous and continuing studies have r...
The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses
The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses
To achieve high therapeutic efficacy in the patient, information on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics is required. With the development of science and techno...
Translation
Translation
The theoretical, empirical, and pedagogic study of translation is the concern of the interdisciplinary and international field of scholarship known, since 1972, as translation stud...
Impact of Gene Annotation Choice on the Quantification of RNA-Seq Data
Impact of Gene Annotation Choice on the Quantification of RNA-Seq Data
Abstract
Background: RNA sequencing is currently the method of choice for genome-wide profiling of gene expression. A popular approach to quantify expression levels of gene...
SPECIFIC TRAITS OF HUNGARIAN-UKRAINIAN POETRY TRANSLATION (BASED ON YURII SHKROBYNETS’ TRANSLATIONS)
SPECIFIC TRAITS OF HUNGARIAN-UKRAINIAN POETRY TRANSLATION (BASED ON YURII SHKROBYNETS’ TRANSLATIONS)
The article addresses matters related to the peculiarities of Hungarian-Ukrainian poetic translation. It was noted that the quality, complexity and overall mastery of literary tran...
The Translation Brief as a Tool of Communication among the Participants of the Translation Process
The Translation Brief as a Tool of Communication among the Participants of the Translation Process
The present research focuses on theoretical and practical aspects of the translation brief viewed as a tool of communication among the participants of the translation process. A re...
Transcript Assembly and Annotations: Bias and Adjustment
Transcript Assembly and Annotations: Bias and Adjustment
AbstractMotivationTranscript annotations play a critical role in gene expression analysis as they serve as a reference for quantifying isoform-level expression. The two main source...

