Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Complications of revision knee arthroplasty

View through CrossRef
Due to the growing scale of arthroplasty and the widening of indications for knee joint replacement, the durability of joint functioning has become a critical issue. Untimely diagnosis and inadequate treatment of patients with endoprosthesis component loosening leads to major bone defects. This problem arises from repeated joint interventions, large bone defects and duration of revision surgeries, that is fraught with catastrophic consequences for patients – revision prosthesis removal or even limb amputation. The project aims to improve the treatment for patients with instability of components after knee joint arthroplasty. The aim of the study is to analyze the results of revision knee arthroplasty and identify the causes of mistakes and complications of revision arthroplasty with the intention of prevention. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of 50 revision knee arthroplasties performed at the Centre for Arthroplasty of the State Institution “Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” was conducted. Clinical and radiological findings were evaluated for all patients. All revision prostheses used in this study were of the semi-constrained type. Cementation technique was used for all implants. In the revision of the septic complication group, a full cementation technique with antibiotics according to a sensitivity profile were used, while in the aseptic complication group, a surface cementation technique with antibiotics according to sensitivities were used. Results. The authors of the project have analyzed the results of treatment of 50 revision arthroplasty procedures performed between 2013 and 2022 for instability of the endoprosthesis components. The structure of complications has been examined and the causes of failure in revision knee arthroplasty have been identified. This study has shown promise in preventing complications and developing personalized approaches to revision arthroplasty. Conclusions. The analysis of revision knee arthroplasty failure has shown the prevalence of septic complications (56.0 %). In the case of septic complications after revision arthroplasty, Staphylococcus aureus prevailed (57.1 %), gram (-) microorganisms were causative agents in other cases. Factors resulting in aseptic complications included those associated with the surgical intervention (81.8 %), the patient (45.4 %) and the combination thereof (72.7 %). Significant causes of the femoral revision component loosening were residual valgus deformity, medial instability in the frontal plane; significant causes of the tibial component loosening were residual varus deformity and lateral instability in the frontal plane.
Title: Complications of revision knee arthroplasty
Description:
Due to the growing scale of arthroplasty and the widening of indications for knee joint replacement, the durability of joint functioning has become a critical issue.
Untimely diagnosis and inadequate treatment of patients with endoprosthesis component loosening leads to major bone defects.
This problem arises from repeated joint interventions, large bone defects and duration of revision surgeries, that is fraught with catastrophic consequences for patients – revision prosthesis removal or even limb amputation.
The project aims to improve the treatment for patients with instability of components after knee joint arthroplasty.
The aim of the study is to analyze the results of revision knee arthroplasty and identify the causes of mistakes and complications of revision arthroplasty with the intention of prevention.
Materials and methods.
A retrospective analysis of 50 revision knee arthroplasties performed at the Centre for Arthroplasty of the State Institution “Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” was conducted.
Clinical and radiological findings were evaluated for all patients.
All revision prostheses used in this study were of the semi-constrained type.
Cementation technique was used for all implants.
In the revision of the septic complication group, a full cementation technique with antibiotics according to a sensitivity profile were used, while in the aseptic complication group, a surface cementation technique with antibiotics according to sensitivities were used.
Results.
The authors of the project have analyzed the results of treatment of 50 revision arthroplasty procedures performed between 2013 and 2022 for instability of the endoprosthesis components.
The structure of complications has been examined and the causes of failure in revision knee arthroplasty have been identified.
This study has shown promise in preventing complications and developing personalized approaches to revision arthroplasty.
Conclusions.
The analysis of revision knee arthroplasty failure has shown the prevalence of septic complications (56.
0 %).
In the case of septic complications after revision arthroplasty, Staphylococcus aureus prevailed (57.
1 %), gram (-) microorganisms were causative agents in other cases.
Factors resulting in aseptic complications included those associated with the surgical intervention (81.
8 %), the patient (45.
4 %) and the combination thereof (72.
7 %).
Significant causes of the femoral revision component loosening were residual valgus deformity, medial instability in the frontal plane; significant causes of the tibial component loosening were residual varus deformity and lateral instability in the frontal plane.

Related Results

Hip Functions in Patients with Rotating Hinge Knee Arthroplasty
Hip Functions in Patients with Rotating Hinge Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract Background Rotating hinged knee prosthesis is frequently used for certain indications. The indications and results for rotating hinge knee prosthesis in primary an...
The Influence of Kinematic Alignment on Patellofemoral Joint Biomechanics in Total Knee Arthroplasty
The Influence of Kinematic Alignment on Patellofemoral Joint Biomechanics in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Background: Anterior knee pain is a prevalent issue post total knee arthroplasty, often necessitating revision surgery. Various factors contribute to this complication, including p...
Mid-Term Results of Two-stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
Mid-Term Results of Two-stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
Introduction. Today, knee arthroplasty is one of the most common surgical procedures. Infection after endoprosthetics is the most dangerous complication in patients who have underg...
Tapered Modular Femoral Stems for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Show Excellent Mid-Term Survivorship
Tapered Modular Femoral Stems for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Show Excellent Mid-Term Survivorship
Introduction: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be challenging in the face of proximal femoral bone loss, catastrophic implant failure, or recurrent hip instability. Tapere...
Investigating Knee Joint Position Sense After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Male Soccer Players
Investigating Knee Joint Position Sense After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Male Soccer Players
Purpose: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury is the most common knee ligament injury during exercise, with a frequency of 36.9 per 100000 individuals. The characteristics of th...
Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
» Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty affords excellent functional results and implant survivorship for properly selected patients. More high-quality studies are necessary t...

Back to Top