Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The paradox of credence services
View through CrossRef
Loyalty is a goal of any company aiming to be successful in the market. While it is expected that good quality would lead to satisfaction which in turn would result in loyalty, this relationship has not been so simple. Repeated research in this area has come up with contradictory results. Satisfaction measurement has not been a consistent predictor of loyalty, neither has quality. As a result, companies interested in increasing their loyal customer base face the dilemma of deciding if they can expect to see any benefits from improving quality. The purpose of this study is to better explain the relationship between quality, satisfaction and loyalty by including service type in the model. Service type classifies different services on the basis of ease of evaluation. The study looks at the impact of service type on the different relationships in the model, namely, quality to satisfaction, satisfaction to loyalty and quality to loyalty. Next, the mediating effect of satisfaction between quality and loyalty is examined. Finally, the study proposes that service type moderates the mediation effect of satisfaction between quality and loyalty. This study examined perceptions of quality, satisfaction and loyalty in consumers of three different services. These services were selected to represent each of the service types: search, experience and credence. The results provided strong support for the conceptual framework. Service type was found to moderate the relationships between quality and loyalty, satisfaction and loyalty but not between quality and satisfaction. The mediation effect of satisfaction was indeed moderated by service type. In credence services, as compared to other services, the relationship between satisfaction and loyalty as well as quality and loyalty was strongest. This is surprising since it has been believed that improving quality in credence services does not bring any benefits. However this research shows that while consumers may have difficulty evaluating credence services, once they have made a judgment about its quality, they can be the most loyal customers.
Title: The paradox of credence services
Description:
Loyalty is a goal of any company aiming to be successful in the market.
While it is expected that good quality would lead to satisfaction which in turn would result in loyalty, this relationship has not been so simple.
Repeated research in this area has come up with contradictory results.
Satisfaction measurement has not been a consistent predictor of loyalty, neither has quality.
As a result, companies interested in increasing their loyal customer base face the dilemma of deciding if they can expect to see any benefits from improving quality.
The purpose of this study is to better explain the relationship between quality, satisfaction and loyalty by including service type in the model.
Service type classifies different services on the basis of ease of evaluation.
The study looks at the impact of service type on the different relationships in the model, namely, quality to satisfaction, satisfaction to loyalty and quality to loyalty.
Next, the mediating effect of satisfaction between quality and loyalty is examined.
Finally, the study proposes that service type moderates the mediation effect of satisfaction between quality and loyalty.
This study examined perceptions of quality, satisfaction and loyalty in consumers of three different services.
These services were selected to represent each of the service types: search, experience and credence.
The results provided strong support for the conceptual framework.
Service type was found to moderate the relationships between quality and loyalty, satisfaction and loyalty but not between quality and satisfaction.
The mediation effect of satisfaction was indeed moderated by service type.
In credence services, as compared to other services, the relationship between satisfaction and loyalty as well as quality and loyalty was strongest.
This is surprising since it has been believed that improving quality in credence services does not bring any benefits.
However this research shows that while consumers may have difficulty evaluating credence services, once they have made a judgment about its quality, they can be the most loyal customers.
Related Results
In the Mood for Paradox? Das Verhältnis von Fiktion, Stimmung und Welterschließung aus mentalistischer und phänomenologischer Perspektive
In the Mood for Paradox? Das Verhältnis von Fiktion, Stimmung und Welterschließung aus mentalistischer und phänomenologischer Perspektive
AbstractIt is widely acknowledged that responses to fiction can be divided into two categories: emotions or moods. Research on the paradox of fiction, however, solely focused on em...
Organizational Paradox
Organizational Paradox
Organizational paradox offers a theory of the nature and management of competing demands. Historically, the dominant paradigm in organizational theory depicted competing demands as...
The Objects of Credence
The Objects of Credence
Abstract
This book brings to light a simple and deep insight with profound theoretical and policy implications for all who use the credence framework. There are conc...
Credence-First Epistemology
Credence-First Epistemology
Chapter 10 discusses the credence-first approach to coarse-grained attitudes. It is explained how the view underwrites a robust realism about the attitudes and why it bolsters the ...
Problematyka paradoksu w myśli Henriego de Lubaca i Hansa Ursa von Balthasara
Problematyka paradoksu w myśli Henriego de Lubaca i Hansa Ursa von Balthasara
The present work examines the problematics of the role and place of paradox in dogmatic reflection based on the analysis of the works of Henri de Lubac and Hans Urs von Balthasar. ...
Walnut Rootstock Comparison and Own-rooted `Chandler' vs. `Chandler' on Paradox Rootstock
Walnut Rootstock Comparison and Own-rooted `Chandler' vs. `Chandler' on Paradox Rootstock
In a comparison of six walnut rootstocks either nursery-grafted or field-grafted to `Chandler' (
Juglans regia
), the highest-yielding trees...
Conclusion
Conclusion
Abstract
This short chapter gives a brief summary of the message that a user of the credence framework should take away from this book. Firstly, credence claims are ...
The Paradox in the Arab and Western Experience
The Paradox in the Arab and Western Experience
The paradox in the language means to differ between two or more things, its meaning differs from one dictionary to the other even though it is closely related. It has its nouns, ve...

