Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Seasonal and regional analysis of Arctic sea-ice evolution
View through CrossRef
<p>We examine the seasonal and regional evolution of sea-ice coverage in the Arctic. Using satellite and reanalysis data in comparison with model simulations of the 6<sup>th</sup> model intercomparison project (CMIP6), we build on studies (e.g. Niederdrenk and Notz, 2018; SIMIP Community, 2020) that have found a strong linear relationship between September sea-ice area of the northern hemisphere and global atmospheric air temperature (TAS) as well as anthropogenic <span>CO<sub>2</sub></span>&#160;emissions. Instead of focusing on the whole Arctic and September sea ice, we perform sensitivity analyses on higher-resolved regional and seasonal scales, aiming to identify the atmospheric and oceanic drivers that govern the evolution of sea-ice coverage on these scales and to derive simple empirical relationships that describe the impact of these processes. We find clear linkages also on these higher-resolved scales, with different regions and different seasons showing diverse sensitivities of sea-ice area evolution with respect to TAS and anthropogenic&#160;<span>CO<sub>2</sub></span>. Furthermore, we make use of the Mahalanobis distance as a multivariate metric to quantify the "quality" of a single simulation matching the observations, thereby considering the different sensitivities of all months of the year. Building the combined covariance matrix of the observations and simulations as a measure of the joint uncertainties, we can determine how "close" to the observations each single member of the simulations is. This allows us to separate models whose sensitivities are in overall good agreement with the observations from those that are apparently not capable of properly simulating the response of the sea ice to the forcing throughout all months.<br>Based on our findings we can infer the dominant drivers that force Arctic sea-ice evolution on a regional and seasonal scale and also derive projections for the future evolution of Arctic sea ice for different climate scenarios based on simple empirical relationships that can directly be estimated from observational records.<br><br>References:<br>Niederdrenk, A. L., & Notz, D. (2018). Arctic sea ice in a 1.5 &#176;C warmer world. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 1963&#8211;1971. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076159<br>SIMIP Community (2020). Arctic sea ice in CMIP6. Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL086749. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086749</p>
Title: Seasonal and regional analysis of Arctic sea-ice evolution
Description:
<p>We examine the seasonal and regional evolution of sea-ice coverage in the Arctic.
Using satellite and reanalysis data in comparison with model simulations of the 6<sup>th</sup> model intercomparison project (CMIP6), we build on studies (e.
g.
Niederdrenk and Notz, 2018; SIMIP Community, 2020) that have found a strong linear relationship between September sea-ice area of the northern hemisphere and global atmospheric air temperature (TAS) as well as anthropogenic <span>CO<sub>2</sub></span>&#160;emissions.
Instead of focusing on the whole Arctic and September sea ice, we perform sensitivity analyses on higher-resolved regional and seasonal scales, aiming to identify the atmospheric and oceanic drivers that govern the evolution of sea-ice coverage on these scales and to derive simple empirical relationships that describe the impact of these processes.
We find clear linkages also on these higher-resolved scales, with different regions and different seasons showing diverse sensitivities of sea-ice area evolution with respect to TAS and anthropogenic&#160;<span>CO<sub>2</sub></span>.
Furthermore, we make use of the Mahalanobis distance as a multivariate metric to quantify the "quality" of a single simulation matching the observations, thereby considering the different sensitivities of all months of the year.
Building the combined covariance matrix of the observations and simulations as a measure of the joint uncertainties, we can determine how "close" to the observations each single member of the simulations is.
This allows us to separate models whose sensitivities are in overall good agreement with the observations from those that are apparently not capable of properly simulating the response of the sea ice to the forcing throughout all months.
<br>Based on our findings we can infer the dominant drivers that force Arctic sea-ice evolution on a regional and seasonal scale and also derive projections for the future evolution of Arctic sea ice for different climate scenarios based on simple empirical relationships that can directly be estimated from observational records.
<br><br>References:<br>Niederdrenk, A.
L.
, & Notz, D.
(2018).
Arctic sea ice in a 1.
5 &#176;C warmer world.
Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 1963&#8211;1971.
https://doi.
org/10.
1002/2017GL076159<br>SIMIP Community (2020).
Arctic sea ice in CMIP6.
Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL086749.
https://doi.
org/10.
1029/2019GL086749</p>.
Related Results
JIT 2023 - Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos
JIT 2023 - Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos
Es un honor presentar este libro que compila los trabajos de investigación y desarrollo presentados en las Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos (JIT) 2023. Este evento s...
Seasonal Arctic sea ice predictability and prediction
Seasonal Arctic sea ice predictability and prediction
Arctic sea ice plays a central role in the Earth’s climate. Changes in the sea ice on seasonal-to-interannual timescales impact ecosystems, populations and a growing number of stak...
Dissolved Neodymium Isotopes Trace Origin and Spatiotemporal Evolution of Modern Arctic Sea Ice
Dissolved Neodymium Isotopes Trace Origin and Spatiotemporal Evolution of Modern Arctic Sea Ice
<p>The lifetime and thickness of Arctic sea ice have markedly decreased in the recent past. This affects Arctic marine ecosystems and the biological pump, given that ...
Differences in Arctic sea ice simulations from various SODA3 data sets
Differences in Arctic sea ice simulations from various SODA3 data sets
<p>SODA (Simple Ocean Data Assimilation) is one of the ocean reanalysis data widely used in oceanographic research. The SODA3 dataset provides multiple ocean reanalys...
Sea ice deformation and thickness in the Western Ross Sea
Sea ice deformation and thickness in the Western Ross Sea
<p>Sea ice cover is arguably the longest and best observed climate variable from space, with over four decades of highly reliable daily records of extent in both hemi...
Winter sea ice export from the Laptev Sea preconditions the local summer sea ice cover
Winter sea ice export from the Laptev Sea preconditions the local summer sea ice cover
Abstract. Recent studies based on satellite observations have shown that there is a high statistical connection between the late winter (Feb-May) sea ice export out the Laptev Sea,...
Suitability of CICE Sea Ice Model for Seasonal Prediction and Positive Impact of CryoSat-2 Ice Thickness Initialization
Suitability of CICE Sea Ice Model for Seasonal Prediction and Positive Impact of CryoSat-2 Ice Thickness Initialization
Abstract. The Los Alamos sea ice model (CICE) is being tested in standalone mode to identify biases that limit its suitability for seasonal prediction, where CICE is driven by atmo...
Effect of ocean heat flux on Titan's topography and tectonic stresses
Effect of ocean heat flux on Titan's topography and tectonic stresses
INTRODUCTIONThe thermo-mechanical evolution of Titan's ice shell is primarily controlled by the mode of the heat transfer in the ice shell and the amount of heat coming from the oc...

