Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Legal analysis of Agency Theory: an inquiry into the nature of corporation
View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the Agency Theory in order to understand the true nature of the corporation by determining the respective roles of shareholders and directors/managers within a corporation.Design/methodology/approachThe paper compares the economists' depiction of the firm with the legal conception of the corporation. It then analyses the legal concept of ownership and proves that the shareholders are the owners of their shares only and not of the corporation which is a separate legal person. The theories of corporation and relevant case law are also analysed.FindingsThe analysis reveals that currently there are two distinct models of the corporation. The economists view a firm in terms of a nexus of contracts like a partnership where shareholders are the owners of the firm and the directors/managers are their agents. The law, on the other hand, regards the corporation as a separate legal entity with rights and liabilities of a natural person that is not subject to ownership. This doctrine of legal personality is the grund norm of corporate law from which other principles like limited liability, perpetual succession, transferability of shares and independent board are derived. However, both economic and legal models converge upon the purpose of corporation i.e. maximization of shareholders value.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the distinction between economic and legal models of the firm. It points out that from a legal perspective, neither the shareholders are the principals nor the managers are their agents as proposed by the Agency Theory. The economists assume conflict of interests between the shareholders and directors and devise mechanisms to reduce agency costs. Law, on the other hand, determines manifestly the rights and liabilities of each participant in corporate structure. The directors owe their duties to the corporation and manage it without interference from the shareholders. Such arrangement is a product of historical process and qualifies a corporation as a sui generis form of business organization.
Title: Legal analysis of Agency Theory: an inquiry into the nature of corporation
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the Agency Theory in order to understand the true nature of the corporation by determining the respective roles of shareholders and directors/managers within a corporation.
Design/methodology/approachThe paper compares the economists' depiction of the firm with the legal conception of the corporation.
It then analyses the legal concept of ownership and proves that the shareholders are the owners of their shares only and not of the corporation which is a separate legal person.
The theories of corporation and relevant case law are also analysed.
FindingsThe analysis reveals that currently there are two distinct models of the corporation.
The economists view a firm in terms of a nexus of contracts like a partnership where shareholders are the owners of the firm and the directors/managers are their agents.
The law, on the other hand, regards the corporation as a separate legal entity with rights and liabilities of a natural person that is not subject to ownership.
This doctrine of legal personality is the grund norm of corporate law from which other principles like limited liability, perpetual succession, transferability of shares and independent board are derived.
However, both economic and legal models converge upon the purpose of corporation i.
e.
maximization of shareholders value.
Originality/valueThe paper highlights the distinction between economic and legal models of the firm.
It points out that from a legal perspective, neither the shareholders are the principals nor the managers are their agents as proposed by the Agency Theory.
The economists assume conflict of interests between the shareholders and directors and devise mechanisms to reduce agency costs.
Law, on the other hand, determines manifestly the rights and liabilities of each participant in corporate structure.
The directors owe their duties to the corporation and manage it without interference from the shareholders.
Such arrangement is a product of historical process and qualifies a corporation as a sui generis form of business organization.
Related Results
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Corporations in Ukrainian Law
Corporations in Ukrainian Law
This article deals with the special development of the company (or rather corporate) law in Ukrainian legal system. The current legislation does not set the concept of corporation....
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
Administrative Legal Entities of Private Legal Entities as a Status Component of the Legal Regulation Mechanism: Characteristics of Elem
Administrative Legal Entities of Private Legal Entities as a Status Component of the Legal Regulation Mechanism: Characteristics of Elem
The article is devoted to administrative legal personality, which is part of the structure of the administrative-legal personality of private legal entities. At the same time, it i...
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
Problem setting. Digitalization has recently become increasingly important in the professional everyday life of a lawyer. Since 2020, trends in the automation of legal processes ha...
Law implementation and legal relations: links of interrelations
Law implementation and legal relations: links of interrelations
The article addresses to analyze of the theoretical and legal issues of legal norms implementation. The implementation of regulations contained in laws and other regulations means...
Assessing Prospective Physics Teachers' Inquiry Skills in Post-Pandemic: Rasch Analysis
Assessing Prospective Physics Teachers' Inquiry Skills in Post-Pandemic: Rasch Analysis
Inquiry skills are essential for prospective physics teachers. Inquiry skills are a necessary in the educational curriculum because they can help students construct scientific know...

