Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluation of Calibration Treatments, for Frac Pack Completions, in Offshore West Africa

View through CrossRef
Abstract Frac Pack treatments were selected as the most effective completion for the combined benefits of sand control and stimulation from very high permeability, oil-bearing, offshore formations in West Africa. Extensive formation evaluation tests, consisting of step rate and step-down tests, calibration treatments and laboratory core data analysis, were performed prior to the early frac-pack completions. Treatment evaluation, however, was complicated by the inability to correctly characterize calibration tests for estimation of fluid leakoff and the corresponding fracture efficiency values. The presence of near-wellbore effects further compounded the difficulties in analyzing calibration treatment pressures. On most of these applications the propped treatment screened out prematurely and thus had to be terminated early. Previous mini-fracturing pressures were re-analyzed for a consistent evaluation of the calibration tests. A comprehensive pressure analysis methodology was developed for fracture evaluation. Post-fracture closure behavior was examined in addition to traditional analyses of pressures measured during treatment injection and shut-in. An inversion algorithm was also used to objectively predict formation properties and fluid parameters by matching mini-fracturing pressures. These results, log interpretations and laboratory core data were then integrated to improve the predicted fracture parameters and hence provide reasons for treatment failure. This approach investigates all stages of fracturing behavior, thereby providing formation mechanical (stresses, modulus), fluid efficiency (leakoff coefficient) and production (permeability) parameters governing optimal fracture design. Comprehensive case studies, describing this evaluation methodology for multiple injections in different formations with varying mechanical and fracturing fluid properties, are presented. Calibration treatments are first analyzed. Propped treatment pressures are next predicted and compared with field measurements. These evaluations are then applied to properly design and execute subsequent frac-pack completions, which improved the success of such completions. Introduction Frac Pack stimulation treatments were introduced in West Africa to provide a combined well-stimulation and sand control completion. This technique was preferred over a conventional gravel pack treatment because of a lower completion pressure drop and resulting skin, and thus a higher productivity. The Frac Pack technique combines a short highly conductive fracture treatment with a gravel pack. Creation of this fracture reduces the completion pressure drop by: - Providing a highly conductive flow path to the wellbore, which bypasses any near wellbore damage. - Changing the flow path into the well, which will minimize any chance of perforation or gravel pack plugging due to fines or formation sand migration. - Maximizing the quantity of sand placed in each perforation. This insures that all of the perforations are packed with high permeability gravel instead of formation sand. During the introductory phase of this technique, it was quickly realized that calibration treatment pressure analysis posed particular problems in these high permeability wells. Fluid efficiencies were much lower than routinely experienced for treatments or even Frac Packs performed in other parts of the world.
Title: Evaluation of Calibration Treatments, for Frac Pack Completions, in Offshore West Africa
Description:
Abstract Frac Pack treatments were selected as the most effective completion for the combined benefits of sand control and stimulation from very high permeability, oil-bearing, offshore formations in West Africa.
Extensive formation evaluation tests, consisting of step rate and step-down tests, calibration treatments and laboratory core data analysis, were performed prior to the early frac-pack completions.
Treatment evaluation, however, was complicated by the inability to correctly characterize calibration tests for estimation of fluid leakoff and the corresponding fracture efficiency values.
The presence of near-wellbore effects further compounded the difficulties in analyzing calibration treatment pressures.
On most of these applications the propped treatment screened out prematurely and thus had to be terminated early.
Previous mini-fracturing pressures were re-analyzed for a consistent evaluation of the calibration tests.
A comprehensive pressure analysis methodology was developed for fracture evaluation.
Post-fracture closure behavior was examined in addition to traditional analyses of pressures measured during treatment injection and shut-in.
An inversion algorithm was also used to objectively predict formation properties and fluid parameters by matching mini-fracturing pressures.
These results, log interpretations and laboratory core data were then integrated to improve the predicted fracture parameters and hence provide reasons for treatment failure.
This approach investigates all stages of fracturing behavior, thereby providing formation mechanical (stresses, modulus), fluid efficiency (leakoff coefficient) and production (permeability) parameters governing optimal fracture design.
Comprehensive case studies, describing this evaluation methodology for multiple injections in different formations with varying mechanical and fracturing fluid properties, are presented.
Calibration treatments are first analyzed.
Propped treatment pressures are next predicted and compared with field measurements.
These evaluations are then applied to properly design and execute subsequent frac-pack completions, which improved the success of such completions.
Introduction Frac Pack stimulation treatments were introduced in West Africa to provide a combined well-stimulation and sand control completion.
This technique was preferred over a conventional gravel pack treatment because of a lower completion pressure drop and resulting skin, and thus a higher productivity.
The Frac Pack technique combines a short highly conductive fracture treatment with a gravel pack.
Creation of this fracture reduces the completion pressure drop by: - Providing a highly conductive flow path to the wellbore, which bypasses any near wellbore damage.
- Changing the flow path into the well, which will minimize any chance of perforation or gravel pack plugging due to fines or formation sand migration.
- Maximizing the quantity of sand placed in each perforation.
This insures that all of the perforations are packed with high permeability gravel instead of formation sand.
During the introductory phase of this technique, it was quickly realized that calibration treatment pressure analysis posed particular problems in these high permeability wells.
Fluid efficiencies were much lower than routinely experienced for treatments or even Frac Packs performed in other parts of the world.

Related Results

Frac Packs - State of the Art
Frac Packs - State of the Art
Abstract Over the past four years, there has been an increasing amount of success with fracture stimulation of unconsolidated Miocene formations. These "frac pack...
(Invited) Strategies for Calibration Cost Reduction in Heterogeneous Chemical Sensor Arrays
(Invited) Strategies for Calibration Cost Reduction in Heterogeneous Chemical Sensor Arrays
Introduction Heterogeneous gas sensor arrays coupled with machine learning algorithms have been proposed for a wide range of applications. However, i...
On sums involving divisor function, Euler's totient function, and floor function
On sums involving divisor function, Euler's totient function, and floor function
Every positive integer $l \in \mathbb{N}$ can be formed $l = (m + n)d$, provided $gcd(m,n)=1$. From this point of view, the next formulas $n=\sum_{d|l} \varphi(d)$ and $\frac{n(n+1...
On sums involving divisor function, Euler's totient function, and floor function
On sums involving divisor function, Euler's totient function, and floor function
Every positive integer $l \in \mathbb{N}$ can be formed $l = (m + n)d$, provided $gcd(m,n)=1$. From this point of view, the next formulas $n=\sum_{d|l} \varphi(d)$ and $\frac{n(n+1...
New Opportunities for Time-Sensitive Gulf of Mexico Completions
New Opportunities for Time-Sensitive Gulf of Mexico Completions
Abstract Single-trip multi-zone (STMZ) sand control completion systems are not new to the Gulf of Mexico, but the adaptation of these systems for frac-packing has...
Screenless Frac-Pack Completions: Case Studies From Jidong Field, China
Screenless Frac-Pack Completions: Case Studies From Jidong Field, China
This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper SPE 108909, "Screenless Frac-Pack Completions - Case Studies From Jidong Field, China...
Plugless Completions Techniques and Evaluation in the Appalachian Basin
Plugless Completions Techniques and Evaluation in the Appalachian Basin
Abstract The modern hydraulic fracturing process in unconventional shales has relied mainly on the use of mechanical isolation techniques (frac plugs) for internal i...
On sums involving divisor function, Euler's totient function, and floor function
On sums involving divisor function, Euler's totient function, and floor function
Every positive integer $l \in \mathbb{N}$ can be formed $l = (m + n)d$, provided $gcd(m,n)=1$. From this point of view, the next formulas $n=\sum_{d|l} \varphi(d)$ and $\frac{n(n+1...

Back to Top