Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Impact of Acute Coronary Syndrome Classification and Procedural Technique on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Drug‐Eluting Stents
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackground:We examined the impact of non–ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE‐ACS) on clinical outcomes in patients with bifurcation lesions treated with drug‐eluting stents.Hypothesis:We hypothesized that NSTE‐ACS would be attributable to the increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods:We enrolled 1668 patients, using data from a multicenter real‐world bifurcation registry. The primary objective was to compare the 2‐year cumulative risk of MACE in patients with NSTE‐ACS to those with stable angina. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target‐lesion revascularization.Results:Non–ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndrome was seen in 969 (58.1%) patients and stable angina in 699. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 7.3% of NSTE‐ACS patients and in 5.2% with stable angina (P = 0.042). However, cardiac death, MI, and target‐lesion revascularization were similar between the 2 groups. We stratified patients with NSTE‐ACS into those with non–ST‐segment elevation MI and those with unstable angina. Cumulative risks of 2‐year MACEs were 7.0% in non–ST‐segment elevation MI patients and 7.5% in unstable angina patients (P = 0.87). In the NSTE‐ACS cohort, the baseline lesion length in the side branch (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01‐1.07, P = 0.022), paclitaxel‐eluting stents in the main vessel (adjusted HR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.21‐3.40, P = 0.008), and final kissing ballooning (adjusted HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.10‐3.21, P = 0.021) were independent predictors of MACE.Conclusions:Compared with stable angina patients, the NSTE‐ACS patients who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention had an increased risk of MACE during the 2‐year follow‐up. Clin. Cardiol. 2012 doi: 10.1002/clc.22020Drs Pil Sang Song and Dong Ryeol Ryu contributed equally to this work. Coronary Bifurcation Stenting (COBIS) Registry in South Korea, US Department of Health and Human Services, US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT00851526.This work was supported by the Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, Seoul, South Korea. The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Title: Impact of Acute Coronary Syndrome Classification and Procedural Technique on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Drug‐Eluting Stents
Description:
AbstractBackground:We examined the impact of non–ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE‐ACS) on clinical outcomes in patients with bifurcation lesions treated with drug‐eluting stents.
Hypothesis:We hypothesized that NSTE‐ACS would be attributable to the increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.
Methods:We enrolled 1668 patients, using data from a multicenter real‐world bifurcation registry.
The primary objective was to compare the 2‐year cumulative risk of MACE in patients with NSTE‐ACS to those with stable angina.
Major adverse cardiac events were defined as the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target‐lesion revascularization.
Results:Non–ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndrome was seen in 969 (58.
1%) patients and stable angina in 699.
Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 7.
3% of NSTE‐ACS patients and in 5.
2% with stable angina (P = 0.
042).
However, cardiac death, MI, and target‐lesion revascularization were similar between the 2 groups.
We stratified patients with NSTE‐ACS into those with non–ST‐segment elevation MI and those with unstable angina.
Cumulative risks of 2‐year MACEs were 7.
0% in non–ST‐segment elevation MI patients and 7.
5% in unstable angina patients (P = 0.
87).
In the NSTE‐ACS cohort, the baseline lesion length in the side branch (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.
04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.
01‐1.
07, P = 0.
022), paclitaxel‐eluting stents in the main vessel (adjusted HR: 2.
02, 95% CI: 1.
21‐3.
40, P = 0.
008), and final kissing ballooning (adjusted HR: 1.
88, 95% CI: 1.
10‐3.
21, P = 0.
021) were independent predictors of MACE.
Conclusions:Compared with stable angina patients, the NSTE‐ACS patients who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention had an increased risk of MACE during the 2‐year follow‐up.
Clin.
Cardiol.
2012 doi: 10.
1002/clc.
22020Drs Pil Sang Song and Dong Ryeol Ryu contributed equally to this work.
Coronary Bifurcation Stenting (COBIS) Registry in South Korea, US Department of Health and Human Services, US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.
gov no.
NCT00851526.
This work was supported by the Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, Seoul, South Korea.
The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Related Results
3D-printed polymeric bioresorbable stents for cardiovascular applications
3D-printed polymeric bioresorbable stents for cardiovascular applications
(English) Bioresorbable stents (BRS) have been envisioned as a revolution in the treatment of coronary heart disease. Ideally, stents would initially retain sufficient radial stren...
E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
Introduction
The field of Neurointervention has attracted some of the very best physicians across the world. Given the interdisciplinary nature of this specialty,...
Biodegradable-Polymer or Durable-Polymer Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial
Biodegradable-Polymer or Durable-Polymer Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND:
Limited information is available on the comparative efficacy and safety of different stent platforms in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing an abbrevi...
Early Onset of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Early Onset of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) is a rare phenomenon that often goes undiagnosed and causes severe complications, including death. This report prese...
The use of drug eluting stents in single and multivessel disease: results from a single centre experience
The use of drug eluting stents in single and multivessel disease: results from a single centre experience
Objective: Drug eluting stents have been shown to reduce the rate of in-stent restenosis in cases where single lesions are treated. The performance of these stents, in patients wit...
Evolving Paradigms in the Endovascular Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease [CAD]
Evolving Paradigms in the Endovascular Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease [CAD]
Background: Endovascular treatment, or more simply and more practically speaking, the technical implementation of stents [or stent grafts, coils, plugs, etc.] into the blood vessel...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

