Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Iliac Calcium Score thresholds predict cardiovascular and limb-related outcomes in TASC D aortoiliac disease

View through CrossRef
IntroductionExtensive lower limb arterial calcification complicates revascularization and is linked to poor outcomes, including limb loss and cardiovascular events. Standardized scoring systems are lacking, particularly in aortoiliac TASC II D lesions. This study evaluated the prognostic value of a CT-based Iliac Calcium Score (ICS) in predicting major adverse limb events (MALE), cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality in patients with severe aortoiliac disease.MethodsIn this prospective cohort (2013–2024), 109 patients with TASC II D aortoiliac occlusive disease underwent elective revascularization and preoperative CT angiography. Iliac artery calcification was scored semiquantitatively by morphology, circumference, and lesion length. Patients were stratified into low (≤ 36) and high (≥ 37) ICS groups. Outcomes included MALE, MACE, and mortality, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.ResultsThe study included 109 patients (95.4% male) with a median follow-up of 67 months. Baseline characteristics were similar across ICS groups, though ICS ≥ 37 was associated with more advanced Rutherford stages (p = 0.035). At 30 days, both groups improved clinically, but Rutherford class improvement was greater in the ICS ≤ 36 group (p = 0.013), with no other significant differences. At 1 year, MALE was more frequent in patients with ICS ≥ 37 (48.1% vs. 27.3%; p = 0.024). At 60 months, this group showed significantly lower amputation-free (74.5% vs. 97.8%; p = 0.002), MACE-free (47.3% vs. 73.4%; p = 0.005), and overall survival (54.6% vs. 77.0%; p = 0.013). Acute heart failure occurred only in the high ICS group (p = 0.015), while patency rates were similar. ICS ≥ 37 remained an independent predictor of MACE (aHR 2.30; p = 0.008) and major amputation (aHR 7.52; p = 0.008) in multivariable analysis.ConclusionIn patients with extensive TASC II D aortoiliac occlusive disease, an ICS ≥ 37 was independently associated with increased long-term risk of MACE, MALE, and reduced overall survival, despite similar short-term outcomes. These findings support the integration of preoperative calcium scoring as a simple, lesion-specific tool for risk stratification, procedural planning, and personalized postoperative surveillance in complex peripheral arterial disease.
Title: Iliac Calcium Score thresholds predict cardiovascular and limb-related outcomes in TASC D aortoiliac disease
Description:
IntroductionExtensive lower limb arterial calcification complicates revascularization and is linked to poor outcomes, including limb loss and cardiovascular events.
Standardized scoring systems are lacking, particularly in aortoiliac TASC II D lesions.
This study evaluated the prognostic value of a CT-based Iliac Calcium Score (ICS) in predicting major adverse limb events (MALE), cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality in patients with severe aortoiliac disease.
MethodsIn this prospective cohort (2013–2024), 109 patients with TASC II D aortoiliac occlusive disease underwent elective revascularization and preoperative CT angiography.
Iliac artery calcification was scored semiquantitatively by morphology, circumference, and lesion length.
Patients were stratified into low (≤ 36) and high (≥ 37) ICS groups.
Outcomes included MALE, MACE, and mortality, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.
ResultsThe study included 109 patients (95.
4% male) with a median follow-up of 67 months.
Baseline characteristics were similar across ICS groups, though ICS ≥ 37 was associated with more advanced Rutherford stages (p = 0.
035).
At 30 days, both groups improved clinically, but Rutherford class improvement was greater in the ICS ≤ 36 group (p = 0.
013), with no other significant differences.
At 1 year, MALE was more frequent in patients with ICS ≥ 37 (48.
1% vs.
27.
3%; p = 0.
024).
At 60 months, this group showed significantly lower amputation-free (74.
5% vs.
97.
8%; p = 0.
002), MACE-free (47.
3% vs.
73.
4%; p = 0.
005), and overall survival (54.
6% vs.
77.
0%; p = 0.
013).
Acute heart failure occurred only in the high ICS group (p = 0.
015), while patency rates were similar.
ICS ≥ 37 remained an independent predictor of MACE (aHR 2.
30; p = 0.
008) and major amputation (aHR 7.
52; p = 0.
008) in multivariable analysis.
ConclusionIn patients with extensive TASC II D aortoiliac occlusive disease, an ICS ≥ 37 was independently associated with increased long-term risk of MACE, MALE, and reduced overall survival, despite similar short-term outcomes.
These findings support the integration of preoperative calcium scoring as a simple, lesion-specific tool for risk stratification, procedural planning, and personalized postoperative surveillance in complex peripheral arterial disease.

Related Results

Superficial femoral artery disease as a cardiovascular prognostic predictor in aortoiliac revascularization—A cohort study
Superficial femoral artery disease as a cardiovascular prognostic predictor in aortoiliac revascularization—A cohort study
Introduction Aortoiliac disease is a severe manifestation of peripheral artery disease (PAD) that reduces blood flow to the lower limbs, leading to significant morbidit...
Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization in Trans-Atlantic Society Consensus (TASC II) Type C & D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease
Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization in Trans-Atlantic Society Consensus (TASC II) Type C & D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease
Introduction: Aortoiliac occlusive disease is a disabling illness. This study was conducted on the patients of Trans-Atlantic Society Consensus (TASC II) type C & D aortoiliac ...
British Food Journal Volume 45 Issue 9 1943
British Food Journal Volume 45 Issue 9 1943
I now pass on to an aspect of calcium metabolism which is more topical, but probably more controversial. I refer to the incidence of calcium deficiency. By what means can we determ...

Back to Top