#2956 Hemodynamic evaluation of different replacement fluids during therapeutic plasmapheresis with Crit-line™

Abstract Background and Aims Therapeutic plasmapheresis (TP) is an extracorporeal technique used to remove pathogenic macromolecules from the plasma. Human serum Albumin (HSA) or fresh frozen plasma can be used as replacement fluid, alone or in combination, and with or without the addition of a crystalloid such as saline. There is wide practice variation in the type of replacement fluid and according the procedure of TP such as single plasma exchange (SPE) or double plasmafiltration (DFPP). Replacing plasma with crystalloid carries a risk of hypotension if the proportion of replacement with crystalloid exceeds 30%. CRIT-LINE™ monitor estimate RBV changes during HD based on measurements of hematocrit and could be used in hemodialysis to prevent hypotensive episodes. Method We conducted a retrospective case series study in a tertiary center to evaluate RBV changes during TP (SPE & DFPP) in three patients with PIDC treated with chronic TP using SPE or DFPP according to guidelines. For each patient and procedure (SPE or DFPP) we compare different substitution fluid infusion protocol between 2021 and 2023. We evaluated each patient's sessions with CRITLINE™ continuous RBV monitoring during either SPE or DFPP with comparison of different replacement fluid protocols. For DFPP with plasmafractionator EC30 (Asahi Kasei Medical Co., Japan) or medopen30 (Infomed, Switzerland), we compare protocols as follows (1) continuous infusion of 500 ml of HSA 4% throughout the session and (2) 500 ml HSA 4% at the last 20 min of the session. For SPE, we compare protocols as follows (1) 100% volume of HSA 4% supplementation (2) a combination of 70% HSA 4% and 30% of saline started at the last part of the session (3) a combination of 70% HSA 4% and 30% of saline started at the first part of the of the session. Results BVM decreased by 15% ± 5% in DFPP session with 500 ml HSA 4% at the last 20 min of the session and by 12% ± 3 in DFPP session with continuous infusion of 500 ml of HSA 4% throughout the session . In SPE, BVM decreased by 18% ± 2 in session with a combination of 70% HSA 4% and 30% of saline and by 10% in session with 100% albumin substitution. Hypotensive episodes occurred in session with a combination of 70% albumin 4% and 30% of saline at the end of session. Conclusion CRITLINE IV continuous RBV monitoring is an interesting tool that can be used to evaluate the optimal substitution fluid in TP and for prevention of hypotension. Randomized control trial are needed to confirm the results.