Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Thomas Hobbes' view on the subject of power in "Leviathan"

View through CrossRef
Thomas Hobbes (1588 – 1679) was one of the outstanding representatives of English materialism in the seventeenth century (Duncan, 2021), who "systematized Francis Bacon's materialism" (Marx & Engels, 2004, p. 196). At the same time, he applied the principle of mechanism to the socio-political field (Hobbes, 2019, p. 3). In the work on politics, "Leviathan," the main work expresses quite fully the content which is the essence of the political thought of Thomas Hobbes.The state and power, including power in Leviathan, were formed under the influence of the English revolution and civil war. From the loss and suffering caused by the "[w]ar of everyone against everyone" and "man and man are wolves" caused by civil war, Hobbes established the theory of Social contract. That is, in the process of transitioning from the natural state to the civil state, individuals agree to transfer power to the supreme being with incomparable power in order to ensure peace, stability, and security. The powerful, supreme being was described by Hobbes with the image of Leviathan, a sea monster of incomparable power, described in the Christian Bible. The power, responsibility of the supreme, and the relationship between the supreme and the citizens analyzed by Hobbes in "Leviathan" have so far remained topical, leaving valuable lessons for the formation of reasonable political space for socio-economic development.
Title: Thomas Hobbes' view on the subject of power in "Leviathan"
Description:
Thomas Hobbes (1588 – 1679) was one of the outstanding representatives of English materialism in the seventeenth century (Duncan, 2021), who "systematized Francis Bacon's materialism" (Marx & Engels, 2004, p.
196).
At the same time, he applied the principle of mechanism to the socio-political field (Hobbes, 2019, p.
3).
In the work on politics, "Leviathan," the main work expresses quite fully the content which is the essence of the political thought of Thomas Hobbes.
The state and power, including power in Leviathan, were formed under the influence of the English revolution and civil war.
From the loss and suffering caused by the "[w]ar of everyone against everyone" and "man and man are wolves" caused by civil war, Hobbes established the theory of Social contract.
That is, in the process of transitioning from the natural state to the civil state, individuals agree to transfer power to the supreme being with incomparable power in order to ensure peace, stability, and security.
The powerful, supreme being was described by Hobbes with the image of Leviathan, a sea monster of incomparable power, described in the Christian Bible.
The power, responsibility of the supreme, and the relationship between the supreme and the citizens analyzed by Hobbes in "Leviathan" have so far remained topical, leaving valuable lessons for the formation of reasonable political space for socio-economic development.

Related Results

Фронтиспис «Левиафана» как визуальный источник интерпретации идей Томаса Гоббса о демонологии
Фронтиспис «Левиафана» как визуальный источник интерпретации идей Томаса Гоббса о демонологии
Известный трактат Томаса Гоббса «Левиафан, или Материя, форма и власть государства церковного и гражданского» (1651) не только представляет собой обширный политический труд, но и в...
‘Leviathan’ ve Adalet: Hobbes’un Adalet Temellendirmesi
‘Leviathan’ ve Adalet: Hobbes’un Adalet Temellendirmesi
Adalet tartışması ele alınır alınmaz çözülebilecek veya tek defada tüketilebilecek bir mesele değildir. Öteden beri ortaya konulan birçok adalet temellendirmesi bu durumun açık bir...
Hobbes’s Deceiving God: the Correspondence Between Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes
Hobbes’s Deceiving God: the Correspondence Between Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes
In presenting their correspondence, I highlight the means in which Hobbes is able to divorce nature and politics in his philosophy. This is done by bringing to light Hobbes’s agree...
An Early European Critic of Hobbes’s De Corpore
An Early European Critic of Hobbes’s De Corpore
The Animadversiones in Elementorum Philosophiae by a little known Flemish scholar G. Moranus, published in Brussels in 1655 was an early European response to Hobbes’s De Corpore. A...
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Maria Stepanova (b. 1972) is a contemporary Russian poet who has emerged in recent decades as one of the most original and complex voices on the poetically highly heterogeneous and...
A “Galilean Philosopher”? Thomas Hobbes between Aristotelianism and Galilean Science
A “Galilean Philosopher”? Thomas Hobbes between Aristotelianism and Galilean Science
The conventional portrait of Thomas Hobbes that emerged in twentieth century histories of philosophy is that of the quintessential mechanical philosopher, who openly broke with phi...
“Justice I Teach, and Reverence Justice” John Aubrey, “The Life of Hobbes”
“Justice I Teach, and Reverence Justice” John Aubrey, “The Life of Hobbes”
Abstract Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) was an accomplished classicist and mathematician as well as an immensely influential systematic philosopher. His first published w...
THOMAS HOBBES AND THE BLACKLOIST CONSPIRACY OF 1649
THOMAS HOBBES AND THE BLACKLOIST CONSPIRACY OF 1649
In a jarring passage toward the conclusion of Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes endorsed the abolition of episcopacy and the establishment of an Independent religious settlement within Engl...

Back to Top