Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling

View through CrossRef
The widespread use of antimicrobial drugs has contributed to the increasing trace levels of contaminants in the environment, posing an environmental problem and a challenge to modern-day medicine seeking advanced solutions. Nanofiltration is one such breakthrough solution for the selective removal of antibiotics from wastewater due to their high efficiency, scalability, and versatility. This study examines the separation of antibiotics (sulfamethoxazole (SMX), trimethoprim (TMP), and metformin (MET), respectively) using commercially available membranes with an emphasis on AFC membranes (AFC 30 and AFC 80). Thus, we evaluate their efficacy, performance, and applicability in wastewater treatment processes. The data for characterizing the structural parameters of the NF membranes were determined from an uncharged organic solute rejection experiment, and the effect of various operating conditions on the retention of solutes was evaluated. All experimental data were collected using a laboratory-scale nanofiltration unit and HPLC, and rejection percentages were determined using analytical measurements. The results obtained allowed for the determination of the radius of the membrane pores using the Steric Hindrance Pore (SHP) model, resulting in values of 0.353 and 0.268 nm for the AFC 30 and AFC 80 membranes, respectively. Additionally, higher transmembrane pressure and feed flow were observed to lead to an increased rejection of antibiotics. AFC 30 demonstrated a rejection of 94% for SMX, 87% for TMP, and 87% for MET, while AFC 80 exhibited a rejection of 99.5% for SMX, 97.5% for TMP, and 98% for MET. The sieving effect appears to be the primary separation mechanism for AFC 30, as lower feed-flow rates were observed to intensify concentration polarization, thereby compromising rejection efficiency. On the contrary, AFC 80 experienced less concentration polarization due to its smaller pore sizes, effectively preventing pore clogging. Membrane performance was evaluated using the Spiegler–Kedem–Katchalsky model, based on irreversible thermodynamics, which effectively explained the mechanism of solute transport of antibiotics through the AFC 30 and AFC 80 membranes in the NF process.
Title: Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling
Description:
The widespread use of antimicrobial drugs has contributed to the increasing trace levels of contaminants in the environment, posing an environmental problem and a challenge to modern-day medicine seeking advanced solutions.
Nanofiltration is one such breakthrough solution for the selective removal of antibiotics from wastewater due to their high efficiency, scalability, and versatility.
This study examines the separation of antibiotics (sulfamethoxazole (SMX), trimethoprim (TMP), and metformin (MET), respectively) using commercially available membranes with an emphasis on AFC membranes (AFC 30 and AFC 80).
Thus, we evaluate their efficacy, performance, and applicability in wastewater treatment processes.
The data for characterizing the structural parameters of the NF membranes were determined from an uncharged organic solute rejection experiment, and the effect of various operating conditions on the retention of solutes was evaluated.
All experimental data were collected using a laboratory-scale nanofiltration unit and HPLC, and rejection percentages were determined using analytical measurements.
The results obtained allowed for the determination of the radius of the membrane pores using the Steric Hindrance Pore (SHP) model, resulting in values of 0.
353 and 0.
268 nm for the AFC 30 and AFC 80 membranes, respectively.
Additionally, higher transmembrane pressure and feed flow were observed to lead to an increased rejection of antibiotics.
AFC 30 demonstrated a rejection of 94% for SMX, 87% for TMP, and 87% for MET, while AFC 80 exhibited a rejection of 99.
5% for SMX, 97.
5% for TMP, and 98% for MET.
The sieving effect appears to be the primary separation mechanism for AFC 30, as lower feed-flow rates were observed to intensify concentration polarization, thereby compromising rejection efficiency.
On the contrary, AFC 80 experienced less concentration polarization due to its smaller pore sizes, effectively preventing pore clogging.
Membrane performance was evaluated using the Spiegler–Kedem–Katchalsky model, based on irreversible thermodynamics, which effectively explained the mechanism of solute transport of antibiotics through the AFC 30 and AFC 80 membranes in the NF process.

Related Results

Use of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration (OSN) membranes for Counter-Current Chromatography (CCC) solvent recovery
Use of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration (OSN) membranes for Counter-Current Chromatography (CCC) solvent recovery
Solvent resistant membranes are a relatively new technology which has the potential to expand the possible utilities of membranes for process industries. Little is known in terms o...
Préparation et étude de Membranes Asymétriques Polyalcoxyétherimides (PEI) pour la séparation de composés organiques de l'eau
Préparation et étude de Membranes Asymétriques Polyalcoxyétherimides (PEI) pour la séparation de composés organiques de l'eau
Le mémoire rapporte les travaux effectués pour l’élaboration de membranes asymétriques de type co-polyalcoxyéther-imide (PEI) afin d'obtenir des membranes polymères à haut flux, sé...
Polymeric Membrane Nanofiltration and Its Application to Separations in the Chemical Industries
Polymeric Membrane Nanofiltration and Its Application to Separations in the Chemical Industries
AbstractThe application of membrane technology, particularly water‐based nanofiltration, as a separation process in the chemical industries has increased tremendously in recent yea...
Assessing RO and NF Desalination Technologies for Irrigation-Grade Water
Assessing RO and NF Desalination Technologies for Irrigation-Grade Water
In this work, the performance of a Reverse Osmosis (RO) process using different types of reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes is evaluated for brackish water desa...
Interaction between surfactants of different classes and nanofiltration membranes
Interaction between surfactants of different classes and nanofiltration membranes
The presence of surfactants in aquatic environments may alter the water quality parameters. Nanofiltration is a promising technique that can separate surfactants from water with hi...
Elucidation on Performance and Structural Properties of Skinned Asymmetric Nanofiltration Membrane Based on Theoretical Models
Elucidation on Performance and Structural Properties of Skinned Asymmetric Nanofiltration Membrane Based on Theoretical Models
In this study, the performance and structural properties of enhanced skinned asymmetric nanofiltration (NF) membranes were experimentally and theoretically analyzed. Based on Donna...
Extra A Review of Nanofiltration Membrane Technology To Treat Water Problems
Extra A Review of Nanofiltration Membrane Technology To Treat Water Problems
One of the most widely used membranes is the nanofiltration membrane, this membrane is formed from various nanomaterials, such as metal nanoparticles and metal oxides, carbon-based...

Back to Top