Javascript must be enabled to continue!
An Analysis of Legal Considerations of Judicial Decisions on Customary Land Disputes: A Comparison of Indonesia and Africa
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Purpose of the Study: This research aims to analyze judges’ legal considerations in adjudicating Decision No. 20/pdt/2021/PTKDI as well as to find the implications of legal changes on customary land regulations in Kondowa Village, Buton Regency, Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia.
Methodology: This research employed the normative juridical method with the statute approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach. The data were sourced from primary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.
Results: In Decision No. 20/pdt/2021/PTKDI, judges gave legal considerations of the decision based on inapplicable regulations. They ignored the existence of customary laws from the Kampirina Customary Institution. There are different perspectives on the indigenous rights concept as well as the legality of registering customary land. Apart from that, there are different interpretations on the Kampirina Customary Institution’s legality which is based on the Regional Regulation of Buton Regency No. 4 of 2015 on Customary Institutions and Regulation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs No. 52 of 2014 on the Guidelines to Acknowledging and Protecting Indigenous Societies. The legal implication of Decision No. 20/pdt/2021/PTKDI includes changes in the customary law on the regulations regarding customary land as well as the validity of indigenous rights from the Kampirina Customary Institution.
Applications of this Study: This research can be applied by giving insight into judges’ logical dynamics in creating logical legal considerations according to the applicable regulations.
Novelty/Orginality of this Study: This research offers novelty as judges’ legal considerations were analyzed using the customary law as well as the justice awareness theory, the reality theory, and the decision theory that apply in the customary law. This research yielded an analysis of judges’ legal considerations based on the customary law and the positive law that creates a sense of justice for indigenous people.
Keywords: Judicial Decision, Customary Land, Customary Law, Legal Reasoning, Indonesia.
ABSTRAK
Tujuan Penelitian: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam mengadili Putusan No. 20/pdt/2021/PTKDI serta menemukan implikasi perubahan hukum terhadap peraturan pertanahan adat di Desa Kondowa, Kabupaten Buton, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia.
Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Data bersumber dari data primer yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier.
Hasil: Dalam Putusan No. 20/pdt/2021/PTKDI, hakim memberikan pertimbangan hukum atas putusan tersebut berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang tidak berlaku. Hakim mengabaikan keberadaan hukum adat dari Lembaga Adat Kampirina. Terdapat perbedaan perspektif mengenai konsep hak ulayat serta legalitas pendaftaran tanah adat. Selain itu, terdapat perbedaan penafsiran mengenai legalitas Lembaga Adat Kampirina yang didasarkan pada Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Buton No. 4 Tahun 2015 tentang Lembaga Adat dan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 52 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Implikasi hukum dari Putusan No. 20/pdt/2021/PTKDI antara lain perubahan hukum adat terkait pengaturan tanah adat serta keabsahan hak ulayat Lembaga Adat Kampirina.
Aplikasi Penelitian: Penelitian ini dapat diaplikasikan dengan memberikan wawasan mengenai dinamika logika hakim dalam merumuskan pertimbangan hukum yang logis sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku.
Kebaruan/Keaslian Penelitian: Penelitian ini menawarkan kebaruan karena pertimbangan hukum hakim dianalisis menggunakan hukum adat serta teori kesadaran keadilan, teori realitas, dan teori putusan yang berlaku dalam hukum adat. Penelitian ini menghasilkan analisis pertimbangan hukum hakim berdasarkan hukum adat dan hukum positif yang menciptakan rasa keadilan bagi masyarakat adat.
Kata Kunci: Putusan Pengadilan, Tanah Adat, Hukum Adat, Penalaran Hukum, Indonesia
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Title: An Analysis of Legal Considerations of Judicial Decisions on Customary Land Disputes: A Comparison of Indonesia and Africa
Description:
ABSTRACT
Purpose of the Study: This research aims to analyze judges’ legal considerations in adjudicating Decision No.
20/pdt/2021/PTKDI as well as to find the implications of legal changes on customary land regulations in Kondowa Village, Buton Regency, Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia.
Methodology: This research employed the normative juridical method with the statute approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach.
The data were sourced from primary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.
Results: In Decision No.
20/pdt/2021/PTKDI, judges gave legal considerations of the decision based on inapplicable regulations.
They ignored the existence of customary laws from the Kampirina Customary Institution.
There are different perspectives on the indigenous rights concept as well as the legality of registering customary land.
Apart from that, there are different interpretations on the Kampirina Customary Institution’s legality which is based on the Regional Regulation of Buton Regency No.
4 of 2015 on Customary Institutions and Regulation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs No.
52 of 2014 on the Guidelines to Acknowledging and Protecting Indigenous Societies.
The legal implication of Decision No.
20/pdt/2021/PTKDI includes changes in the customary law on the regulations regarding customary land as well as the validity of indigenous rights from the Kampirina Customary Institution.
Applications of this Study: This research can be applied by giving insight into judges’ logical dynamics in creating logical legal considerations according to the applicable regulations.
Novelty/Orginality of this Study: This research offers novelty as judges’ legal considerations were analyzed using the customary law as well as the justice awareness theory, the reality theory, and the decision theory that apply in the customary law.
This research yielded an analysis of judges’ legal considerations based on the customary law and the positive law that creates a sense of justice for indigenous people.
Keywords: Judicial Decision, Customary Land, Customary Law, Legal Reasoning, Indonesia.
ABSTRAK
Tujuan Penelitian: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam mengadili Putusan No.
20/pdt/2021/PTKDI serta menemukan implikasi perubahan hukum terhadap peraturan pertanahan adat di Desa Kondowa, Kabupaten Buton, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia.
Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual.
Data bersumber dari data primer yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier.
Hasil: Dalam Putusan No.
20/pdt/2021/PTKDI, hakim memberikan pertimbangan hukum atas putusan tersebut berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang tidak berlaku.
Hakim mengabaikan keberadaan hukum adat dari Lembaga Adat Kampirina.
Terdapat perbedaan perspektif mengenai konsep hak ulayat serta legalitas pendaftaran tanah adat.
Selain itu, terdapat perbedaan penafsiran mengenai legalitas Lembaga Adat Kampirina yang didasarkan pada Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Buton No.
4 Tahun 2015 tentang Lembaga Adat dan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No.
52 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat.
Implikasi hukum dari Putusan No.
20/pdt/2021/PTKDI antara lain perubahan hukum adat terkait pengaturan tanah adat serta keabsahan hak ulayat Lembaga Adat Kampirina.
Aplikasi Penelitian: Penelitian ini dapat diaplikasikan dengan memberikan wawasan mengenai dinamika logika hakim dalam merumuskan pertimbangan hukum yang logis sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku.
Kebaruan/Keaslian Penelitian: Penelitian ini menawarkan kebaruan karena pertimbangan hukum hakim dianalisis menggunakan hukum adat serta teori kesadaran keadilan, teori realitas, dan teori putusan yang berlaku dalam hukum adat.
Penelitian ini menghasilkan analisis pertimbangan hukum hakim berdasarkan hukum adat dan hukum positif yang menciptakan rasa keadilan bagi masyarakat adat.
Kata Kunci: Putusan Pengadilan, Tanah Adat, Hukum Adat, Penalaran Hukum, Indonesia.
Related Results
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
From conflicting to complementing: The formalisation of customary land management systems governing swidden cultivation in Myanmar
From conflicting to complementing: The formalisation of customary land management systems governing swidden cultivation in Myanmar
<p>Swiddening is a traditional and widespread agricultural system in mountainous regions of Southeast Asia. It is prevalent in Myanmar’s hilly border region. However, economi...
Tolaki Customary Law Regulation on Tolaki Community Land Disputes in Lambandia District, East Kolaka Regency
Tolaki Customary Law Regulation on Tolaki Community Land Disputes in Lambandia District, East Kolaka Regency
Customary land is an essential aspect of the Tolaki tribal community, which is jointly owned by them and holds great significance. However, disputes over customary land often arise...
Proving Customary Law in Uganda: Roadmaps and Roadblocks
Proving Customary Law in Uganda: Roadmaps and Roadblocks
Approaches and methods of proof of customary law in Uganda reflect bias against customary law. Unlike statutory law and common law, judges are not charged with the responsibility ...
Sacred Justice: The Autonomy of Traditional Villages in Resolving Customary Disputes in Bali
Sacred Justice: The Autonomy of Traditional Villages in Resolving Customary Disputes in Bali
The aim of this study is a fundamental part of Indonesia's state structure, as it has existed since Indonesia's independence and has been recognized within the legal framework. Thi...
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
ABSTRACT
The Purpose of this Research is to examine 1) Legal construction of the Judicial Review of Parliamentary Threshold No. 44/PUUXV/2017 and No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024 on Judicial R...
STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY VILLAGES IN SPIRITUAL TOURISM MANAGEMENT IN BALI
STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY VILLAGES IN SPIRITUAL TOURISM MANAGEMENT IN BALI
Abstract
Spiritual tourism is becoming one of the trends in Bali. Many people are currently promoting spiritual tourism. Starting from the private sector as well as under the m...

