Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Authenticity and Identity of Electronic Records

View through CrossRef
One of the key features of an electronic record is its authenticity. Ensuring the authenticity of managerial electronic records at all stages of its life cycle from the moment of its creation to long-term storage allows us to remove obstacles in the development of electronic records management. The authenticity of electronic records has been the subject of research within the frameworks of an international project InterPARES. A record is considered authentic if its author, place, and time of creation are definitely established, as well as its provenance from the said author. To ensure this property of an electronic record, not only authentication and electronic signature at the moment of the record creation are required, but also creation of the so-called “trusted environment” designed to ensure preservation of records metadata by means of controlled managerial procedures. The focus should be on the information system as a whole. This understanding of electronic record authenticity has been entrenched in international standards on information and documentation. In Russian practice, the concept of “authenticity” is used very rarely; when applied to management electronic records, it is used mainly in the sense of identicalness to some source record. Such understanding involves procedures for comparison with reference record, which should remain unchanged. At the same time, within electronic environment in which the functioning of electronic records takes place, it is practically impossible to ensure that file(s) remain unchanged. Given the record’s social nature, we must understand that immutability of an electronic record is a relative concept that concerns preservation of its social function. That is why we must allow only a relative recognition of the identity of electronic records, allowing for possibility of some changes within which the electronic record retains its social functions. The difference between the copies of electronic records within this difference allows us to talk about authentic records.
Russian State University for the Humanities
Title: Authenticity and Identity of Electronic Records
Description:
One of the key features of an electronic record is its authenticity.
Ensuring the authenticity of managerial electronic records at all stages of its life cycle from the moment of its creation to long-term storage allows us to remove obstacles in the development of electronic records management.
The authenticity of electronic records has been the subject of research within the frameworks of an international project InterPARES.
A record is considered authentic if its author, place, and time of creation are definitely established, as well as its provenance from the said author.
To ensure this property of an electronic record, not only authentication and electronic signature at the moment of the record creation are required, but also creation of the so-called “trusted environment” designed to ensure preservation of records metadata by means of controlled managerial procedures.
The focus should be on the information system as a whole.
This understanding of electronic record authenticity has been entrenched in international standards on information and documentation.
In Russian practice, the concept of “authenticity” is used very rarely; when applied to management electronic records, it is used mainly in the sense of identicalness to some source record.
Such understanding involves procedures for comparison with reference record, which should remain unchanged.
At the same time, within electronic environment in which the functioning of electronic records takes place, it is practically impossible to ensure that file(s) remain unchanged.
Given the record’s social nature, we must understand that immutability of an electronic record is a relative concept that concerns preservation of its social function.
That is why we must allow only a relative recognition of the identity of electronic records, allowing for possibility of some changes within which the electronic record retains its social functions.
The difference between the copies of electronic records within this difference allows us to talk about authentic records.

Related Results

Evaluating Authenticity in Heritage: A Quantitative Framework
Evaluating Authenticity in Heritage: A Quantitative Framework
Authenticity has long been regarded as an essential criterion for valuing heritage. While the Venice Charter presents a paradigm for international conservation policies aimed at ge...
Zheng Xiaoyun`s Theory of Cultural Identity
Zheng Xiaoyun`s Theory of Cultural Identity
This article is an analysis of the theory of cultural identity by Zheng Xiaoyun, a distinguished Chinese philosopher. His theory of cultural identity presented here gives a new per...
Terroir store brand authenticity
Terroir store brand authenticity
PurposeThe objective of this exploratory study was to investigate the communication themes that retailers should prioritise to convey terroir store brands’ (TSBs) authenticity and ...
An Integrated Developmental Model for Studying Identity Content in Context
An Integrated Developmental Model for Studying Identity Content in Context
Historically, identity researchers have placed greater emphasis on processes of identity development (how people develop their identities) and less on the content of identity (what...
Confidentiality in Digital Health Records: Aligning Privacy and Care Advancement in Hospitals
Confidentiality in Digital Health Records: Aligning Privacy and Care Advancement in Hospitals
The development of medical services is undergoing a period of transformation towards digitalization. One form of medical services development in Indonesia is electronic medical rec...
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
IntroductionThe American artist Ryan Trecartin makes digital videos that centre on the self-presentations common to video-sharing sites such as YouTube. Named by New Yorker critic ...
Civilizational identity of Russia and culture. Part 1
Civilizational identity of Russia and culture. Part 1
This article raises and discusses the need to substantiate a holistic view of collective identity. This formulation of the question is a reaction to the use of the concept of “iden...
Identity and Career Maturity in Kinesiology Students
Identity and Career Maturity in Kinesiology Students
The purpose of this study was to explore athletic identity, identity foreclosure, and career maturity in a sample of undergraduate college students currently enrolled in kinesiolog...

Back to Top