Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Local recontextualization in Chinese-English court decisions translation
View through CrossRef
Local recontextualization refers to the change in the contextualization of grammatical units at the rank of the word group. It provides a description of the local environment for meaning reconfiguration, and thus plays a key role in the translation of court decisions. Through a purpose-built parallel corpus of Chinese court decisions and their English translations, this study explores the recontextualization of Chinese nominal groups with de based on the analysis of their multivariate structures and the meaning of functional elements providing their (re)contextualization. By comparing the differences in contextualization and recontextualization of nominal groups, this study reveals that nominal groups tend to be contextualized by the Qualifier and the Deictic in Chinese court decisions, and re-contextualized by the Deictic and the Thing in their English translations. In most of the nominal groups, the functional elements with contextualizing roles focus on both experiential meaning and interpersonal meaning while those with recontextualizing roles contribute more to the experiential meaning. The reasons that account for these differences between contextualization and recontextualization of nominal groups from linguistic and legal cultural perspectives are provided.
Title: Local recontextualization in Chinese-English court decisions translation
Description:
Local recontextualization refers to the change in the contextualization of grammatical units at the rank of the word group.
It provides a description of the local environment for meaning reconfiguration, and thus plays a key role in the translation of court decisions.
Through a purpose-built parallel corpus of Chinese court decisions and their English translations, this study explores the recontextualization of Chinese nominal groups with de based on the analysis of their multivariate structures and the meaning of functional elements providing their (re)contextualization.
By comparing the differences in contextualization and recontextualization of nominal groups, this study reveals that nominal groups tend to be contextualized by the Qualifier and the Deictic in Chinese court decisions, and re-contextualized by the Deictic and the Thing in their English translations.
In most of the nominal groups, the functional elements with contextualizing roles focus on both experiential meaning and interpersonal meaning while those with recontextualizing roles contribute more to the experiential meaning.
The reasons that account for these differences between contextualization and recontextualization of nominal groups from linguistic and legal cultural perspectives are provided.
Related Results
Recontextualization in International Business
Recontextualization in International Business
Abstract
Recontextualization in international business (IB) refers to the transformation of meaning of firm offerings (technologies, work practices, products, etc...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Aviation English - A global perspective: analysis, teaching, assessment
Aviation English - A global perspective: analysis, teaching, assessment
This e-book brings together 13 chapters written by aviation English researchers and practitioners settled in six different countries, representing institutions and universities fro...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Editorial Introduction: Translating the Future: Exploring the Impact of Technology and AI on Modern Translation Studies
Editorial Introduction: Translating the Future: Exploring the Impact of Technology and AI on Modern Translation Studies
We have entered into the era of artificial intelligence, neural machine translation, and especially large language models which have dramatically changed the landscape of human tra...
Diversity Defeated After Trial: May an Appellate Court Vacate a Judgment?
Diversity Defeated After Trial: May an Appellate Court Vacate a Judgment?
This article previews the Supreme Court case in <i>The Hains Celestial Group, Inc., Whole Foods Market, Inc. v. Sarah Palmquist</i>., No-24-724, argued to the Court on ...
Translation
Translation
The theoretical, empirical, and pedagogic study of translation is the concern of the interdisciplinary and international field of scholarship known, since 1972, as translation stud...

