Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Impact of ruxolitinib pretreatment on outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis
View through CrossRef
AbstractIntroductionRuxolitinib is the first approved drug for treatment of myelofibrosis, but its impact of outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown.Patients and methodsWe reported on 159 myelofibrosis patients (pts) with a median age of 59 years (r: 28‐74) who received reduced intensity ASCT between 2000 and 2015 in eight German centers from related (n = 23), matched (n = 86) or mismatched (n = 50) unrelated donors. Forty‐six (29%) patients received ruxolitinib at any time point prior to ASCT. The median daily dose of ruxolitinib was 30 mg (range 10‐40 mg) and the median duration of treatment was 4.9 months (range 0.4‐39.1 months).ResultsPrimary graft failure was seen in 2 pts (4%) in the ruxolitinib and 3 (2%) in the non‐ruxolitinib group. Engraftment and incidence of acute GVHD grade II to IV and III/IV did not differ between groups (37% vs 39% and 19% vs 28%, respectively), nor did the non‐relapse mortality at 2 years (23% vs 23%). A trend for lower risk of relapse was seen in the ruxolitinib group (9% vs 17%, P = .2), resulting in a similar 2 year DFS and OS (68% vs 60% and 73% vs 70%, respectively). No difference in any outcome variable could be seen between ruxolitinib responders and those who failed or lost response to ruxolitinib.ConclusionsThese results suggest that ruxolitinib pretreatment in myelofibrosis patient does not negatively influence outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Wiley
Title: Impact of ruxolitinib pretreatment on outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis
Description:
AbstractIntroductionRuxolitinib is the first approved drug for treatment of myelofibrosis, but its impact of outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown.
Patients and methodsWe reported on 159 myelofibrosis patients (pts) with a median age of 59 years (r: 28‐74) who received reduced intensity ASCT between 2000 and 2015 in eight German centers from related (n = 23), matched (n = 86) or mismatched (n = 50) unrelated donors.
Forty‐six (29%) patients received ruxolitinib at any time point prior to ASCT.
The median daily dose of ruxolitinib was 30 mg (range 10‐40 mg) and the median duration of treatment was 4.
9 months (range 0.
4‐39.
1 months).
ResultsPrimary graft failure was seen in 2 pts (4%) in the ruxolitinib and 3 (2%) in the non‐ruxolitinib group.
Engraftment and incidence of acute GVHD grade II to IV and III/IV did not differ between groups (37% vs 39% and 19% vs 28%, respectively), nor did the non‐relapse mortality at 2 years (23% vs 23%).
A trend for lower risk of relapse was seen in the ruxolitinib group (9% vs 17%, P = .
2), resulting in a similar 2 year DFS and OS (68% vs 60% and 73% vs 70%, respectively).
No difference in any outcome variable could be seen between ruxolitinib responders and those who failed or lost response to ruxolitinib.
ConclusionsThese results suggest that ruxolitinib pretreatment in myelofibrosis patient does not negatively influence outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Related Results
Impact of Pre-Transplant Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients on Outcome after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Impact of Pre-Transplant Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients on Outcome after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Abstract
Introduction
Ruxolitinib is the first approved drug for treatment of myelofibrosis. Major effects are reduction in spleen siz...
Ruxolitinib during Peritransplant Period for Myelofibrosis Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Reduces Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Ruxolitinib during Peritransplant Period for Myelofibrosis Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Reduces Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Abstract
Introduction
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment approach for patients with myelofibrosis, but associated with a hig...
Possibilities of targeted therapy for myelofibrosis: Moscow experience
Possibilities of targeted therapy for myelofibrosis: Moscow experience
Background. For many years the primary aim of treatment strategy for ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms has been to restrain disease progression, with lasting relief and mana...
Targeting Glutamine Metabolism in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Targeting Glutamine Metabolism in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Abstract
Introduction:
The chronic Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera (PV), essential t...
Abstract 3870: Ruxolitinib diminishes cell proliferation and invasiveness in BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma
Abstract 3870: Ruxolitinib diminishes cell proliferation and invasiveness in BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma
Introduction:
Treatment with a BRAF inhibitor of unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation has an estimated 5-year survival rate of ...
Stem cells
Stem cells
What is a stem cell? The term is a combination of ‘cell’ and ‘stem’. A cell is a major category of living thing, while a stem is a site of growth and support for something else. In...
Could rituximab be a silver lining in refractory bone marrow fibrosis caused by lupus?
Could rituximab be a silver lining in refractory bone marrow fibrosis caused by lupus?
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that can present with a variety of clinical manifestations, ranging from mild skin involvement to multisystemic ...
Decision analysis for transplant candidates with primary myelofibrosis in the ruxolitinib era
Decision analysis for transplant candidates with primary myelofibrosis in the ruxolitinib era
The recent progress with ruxolitinib treatment might improve quality-of-life as well as overall survival in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Therefore, the optimal timing...

