Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pack-Crack-Pack: Gerrymandering with Differential Turnout

View through CrossRef
This paper studies the manipulation of electoral maps by political parties, known as gerrymandering. At the core of our analysis is the recognition that districts must have the same population size but only voters matter for electoral incentives. Using a novel model of gerrymandering that allows for heterogeneity in turnout rates, we show that parties adopt different gerrymandering strategies depending on the turnout rates of their supporters relative to those of their opponents. The broad pattern is to "pack-crack-pack" along the turnout dimension. That is, parties benefit from packing both supporters with a low turnout rate and opponents with a high turnout rate in some districts, while creating districts that mix supporters and opponents with intermediate turnout rates. This framework allows us to derive a number of empirical implications about the link between partisan support, turnout rates, and electoral maps. Using a novel empirical strategy that relies on the comparison of maps proposed by Democrats and Republicans during the 2020 redistricting cycle in the US, we then bring such empirical implications to the data and find support for them.<br><br>Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at <a href="http://www.nber.org/papers/&#119;31442" TARGET="_blank">www.nber.org</a>.<br>
Title: Pack-Crack-Pack: Gerrymandering with Differential Turnout
Description:
This paper studies the manipulation of electoral maps by political parties, known as gerrymandering.
At the core of our analysis is the recognition that districts must have the same population size but only voters matter for electoral incentives.
Using a novel model of gerrymandering that allows for heterogeneity in turnout rates, we show that parties adopt different gerrymandering strategies depending on the turnout rates of their supporters relative to those of their opponents.
The broad pattern is to "pack-crack-pack" along the turnout dimension.
That is, parties benefit from packing both supporters with a low turnout rate and opponents with a high turnout rate in some districts, while creating districts that mix supporters and opponents with intermediate turnout rates.
This framework allows us to derive a number of empirical implications about the link between partisan support, turnout rates, and electoral maps.
Using a novel empirical strategy that relies on the comparison of maps proposed by Democrats and Republicans during the 2020 redistricting cycle in the US, we then bring such empirical implications to the data and find support for them.
<br><br>Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at <a href="http://www.
nber.
org/papers/&#119;31442" TARGET="_blank">www.
nber.
org</a>.
<br>.

Related Results

Pack-Crack-Pack: Gerrymandering with Differential Turnout
Pack-Crack-Pack: Gerrymandering with Differential Turnout
This paper studies the manipulation of electoral maps by political parties, commonly referred to as gerrymandering. At the core of our analysis is the recognition that not all inha...
Research on wear and grinding treatment of high-speed turnout rails
Research on wear and grinding treatment of high-speed turnout rails
Abstract To mitigate steel rail wear in turnouts, this study examines wear mechanisms and influencing factors in high-speed turnouts. We establish a coupled dynamics model ...
Legislative Privilege and Partisan Gerrymandering in the States
Legislative Privilege and Partisan Gerrymandering in the States
<p>After <i>Rucho&nbsp;</i>closed the door on federal review of partisan gerrymandering, state courts became the exclusive forum for challenges to partisan ge...
Tuning out -2024: Explaining Declining Turnout and its Impact. James Prentice, Doctoral student - University of Sussex.
Tuning out -2024: Explaining Declining Turnout and its Impact. James Prentice, Doctoral student - University of Sussex.
A key but unexplored theme of this year’s general election was a noticeable sense of voter apathy, leading to a large decrease in turnout. Across all constituencies, turnout declin...
Modelling And Analysis Of Crack Turning On Aeronautical Structures
Modelling And Analysis Of Crack Turning On Aeronautical Structures
La motivació de la tesis deriva en el interès de la indústria aeronàutica a explotar, per mitjà d'un disseny adaptat, la utilització del gir d'esquerda per protegir els reforços si...
Blocked from the Ballot Box: Structural Obstacles Depress Turnout, Exacerbate Ballot Rejections Across Racial Lines
Blocked from the Ballot Box: Structural Obstacles Depress Turnout, Exacerbate Ballot Rejections Across Racial Lines
In our analysis of voter turnout and ballot rejections in battleground counties in the 2016, 2020, and 2024 general elections, we found evidence of what we refer to as electoral cu...
How Does Public Transit Connectivity Affect Voter Turnout? The Case of US
How Does Public Transit Connectivity Affect Voter Turnout? The Case of US
This paper utilizes three methodological approaches to explore the relationship between public transit connectivity and voter turnout. The first approach compares the cases of Los ...
The Possible Impact of Different Pack Sizes of Carbonated Soft Drinks on Sugar Intake in Nigeria
The Possible Impact of Different Pack Sizes of Carbonated Soft Drinks on Sugar Intake in Nigeria
Background : According to WHO, in 2022, 16% of adults and 8% of children and adolescents globally were living with obesity. In Nigeria, the adult obesity prevalence was around 15%....

Back to Top