Javascript must be enabled to continue!
SOIL-CEMENT UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY IN AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTION
View through CrossRef
This study presents an analytical comparison of alternative foundation solutions for a frame-type agricultural building, with a specific focus on the efficiency of deep soil mixing technology employing soil–cement piles. The research evaluates three foundation types: reinforced bored concrete piles, bored injection piles, and soil–cement piles produced using in-situ mixing technology. A comprehensive techno-economic comparison was conducted based on the reduced cost coefficient method to determine the most cost-effective solution.
The findings demonstrate that soil–cement piles provide the most economical option among the three examined alternatives. This type of pile foundation showed the lowest value of reduced costs, making it the most financially viable solution for the construction of agricultural structures. Additionally, significant savings in material consumption – particularly concrete and reinforcement steel – were identified, contributing further to the cost-effectiveness of the proposed solution.
The practical benefits of using soil–cement foundations extend beyond direct cost savings. These elements are especially suitable for agricultural applications, including buildings for livestock farming, greenhouses, grain depots, food processing facilities, and auxiliary structures.
One of the major logistical advantages of deep soil mixing technology is its adaptability to remote rural areas, where infrastructure is limited. The use of local soils mixed with cementitious binders directly on-site minimizes the transportation of bulk materials, reducing both environmental impact and logistical expenses. Mobile soil-mixing equipment enables flexible and rapid deployment, enhancing project execution efficiency in field conditions. Furthermore, the technology eliminates the need for extensive material storage or large construction staging areas, making it particularly advantageous for projects located far from urban centers.
The research confirms the technical and economic viability of soil–cement piles constructed via deep soil mixing technology as a rational and sustainable foundation solution for agricultural buildings, particularly in remote or infrastructure-limited settings. The outcomes of this study may serve as a foundation for further research on optimizing the structural performance and cost-efficiency of soil–cement systems in agricultural settings. Moreover, the findings could assist engineers and project planners in selecting sustainable and locally adaptable solutions for rural construction challenges.
O.M.Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv
Title: SOIL-CEMENT UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY IN AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTION
Description:
This study presents an analytical comparison of alternative foundation solutions for a frame-type agricultural building, with a specific focus on the efficiency of deep soil mixing technology employing soil–cement piles.
The research evaluates three foundation types: reinforced bored concrete piles, bored injection piles, and soil–cement piles produced using in-situ mixing technology.
A comprehensive techno-economic comparison was conducted based on the reduced cost coefficient method to determine the most cost-effective solution.
The findings demonstrate that soil–cement piles provide the most economical option among the three examined alternatives.
This type of pile foundation showed the lowest value of reduced costs, making it the most financially viable solution for the construction of agricultural structures.
Additionally, significant savings in material consumption – particularly concrete and reinforcement steel – were identified, contributing further to the cost-effectiveness of the proposed solution.
The practical benefits of using soil–cement foundations extend beyond direct cost savings.
These elements are especially suitable for agricultural applications, including buildings for livestock farming, greenhouses, grain depots, food processing facilities, and auxiliary structures.
One of the major logistical advantages of deep soil mixing technology is its adaptability to remote rural areas, where infrastructure is limited.
The use of local soils mixed with cementitious binders directly on-site minimizes the transportation of bulk materials, reducing both environmental impact and logistical expenses.
Mobile soil-mixing equipment enables flexible and rapid deployment, enhancing project execution efficiency in field conditions.
Furthermore, the technology eliminates the need for extensive material storage or large construction staging areas, making it particularly advantageous for projects located far from urban centers.
The research confirms the technical and economic viability of soil–cement piles constructed via deep soil mixing technology as a rational and sustainable foundation solution for agricultural buildings, particularly in remote or infrastructure-limited settings.
The outcomes of this study may serve as a foundation for further research on optimizing the structural performance and cost-efficiency of soil–cement systems in agricultural settings.
Moreover, the findings could assist engineers and project planners in selecting sustainable and locally adaptable solutions for rural construction challenges.
Related Results
FLY ASH FOUNDATION REINFORCED BY CEMENT–SOIL MIXING PILES
FLY ASH FOUNDATION REINFORCED BY CEMENT–SOIL MIXING PILES
Cement-soil mixing piles have been commonly used to enhance the bearing capacity of fly ash stratum and mitigate the settlement damage to the surrounding environment. However, only...
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study
This study compares the strength of the native bone-cement bond and the old-new cement bond under cyclic loading, using third generation cementing technique, rasping and contaminat...
Real-Time Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing for Cement Sheath Integrity Monitoring
Real-Time Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing for Cement Sheath Integrity Monitoring
ABSTRACT:
The integrity of cement sheath is critical to oil and gas effective extraction, in which the cement displacement efficiency and solidify quality are the...
Cement Evaluation - A Risky Business
Cement Evaluation - A Risky Business
Abstract
Cement evaluation is commonly thought of as running a cement bond log (CBL) and attempting to interpret the results to determine if there is isolation in th...
Experiment Study of Stress and Pore Pressure in Setting Cement Paste
Experiment Study of Stress and Pore Pressure in Setting Cement Paste
ABSTRACT:
Cement sheath integrity plays an important role in ensuring the wellbore safety. Shear failure, tensile crack or debonding may happen in the cement shea...
Engineering Structural Strength Properties of Lateritic Soil-Cement Mix for Road Pavement Stability
Engineering Structural Strength Properties of Lateritic Soil-Cement Mix for Road Pavement Stability
Qualitative construction materials in highway pavement prompted addition of cement at different proportion of 2 - 10% to lateritic soils for enhanced performance. Engineering geolo...
Experimental and Numerical Determination of Cement Casing Microannulus
Experimental and Numerical Determination of Cement Casing Microannulus
ABSTRACT
The key to successful long term well integrity of cement-casing is to understand and investigate the hydraulic sealing of cementing annulus by detecting ...
Monitoring the hardening process of cemented soil with polymer optical fibre
Monitoring the hardening process of cemented soil with polymer optical fibre
Abstract
Cement-soil can effectively improve the mechanical characteristics of soft soil and reduce the deformation of foundations through the physical and chemic...

