Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Duopoly Model with Asymmetric Buyer Distribution
View through CrossRef
We introduce asymmetric buyer distribution into a traditional duopoly model to study its impact on equilibria both in price-setting competition and quantity-setting competition. We show that non-negative output constraints become binding when products are close enough substitutes and buyer distribution is asymmetric enough. When these constraints are binding, a rival firm with less than 50% buyer distribution effectively exists the market and monopoly profit is accrued to the surviving firm. Since pricesetting competition is more intense than quantity-setting competition, the market exit occurs with less asymmetric buyer distribution in price-setting competition than in quantity-setting competition. Therefore, the reversal of usual profit ranking can arise in the sense that the surviving firm in price competition earns monopoly profit in price-setting competition while the same firm earns much less duopoly profit in quantity-setting competition. Moreover, three distinct limit equilibria are identified in price-setting competition with perfect substitutes and symmetric buyer distribution. These results highlight an important role played by buyer distribution.
Title: Duopoly Model with Asymmetric Buyer Distribution
Description:
We introduce asymmetric buyer distribution into a traditional duopoly model to study its impact on equilibria both in price-setting competition and quantity-setting competition.
We show that non-negative output constraints become binding when products are close enough substitutes and buyer distribution is asymmetric enough.
When these constraints are binding, a rival firm with less than 50% buyer distribution effectively exists the market and monopoly profit is accrued to the surviving firm.
Since pricesetting competition is more intense than quantity-setting competition, the market exit occurs with less asymmetric buyer distribution in price-setting competition than in quantity-setting competition.
Therefore, the reversal of usual profit ranking can arise in the sense that the surviving firm in price competition earns monopoly profit in price-setting competition while the same firm earns much less duopoly profit in quantity-setting competition.
Moreover, three distinct limit equilibria are identified in price-setting competition with perfect substitutes and symmetric buyer distribution.
These results highlight an important role played by buyer distribution.
Related Results
Duopoly Model with Asymmetric Buyer Distribution
Duopoly Model with Asymmetric Buyer Distribution
We introduce asymmetric buyer distribution into a traditional duopoly model to study its impact on equilibria both in price-setting competition and quantity-setting competition. We...
Buyer‐focused operations as a supply chain strategy
Buyer‐focused operations as a supply chain strategy
PurposeBuyer‐focused operations aim at a high level of supply chain alignment by singling out resources for one buyer in order to serve this buyer optimally. The purpose of this pa...
Responsiveness through buyer‐focused cells: exploring a new supply strategy
Responsiveness through buyer‐focused cells: exploring a new supply strategy
PurposeThe concept of buyer focus has recently been introduced as a new supply chain strategy, although the design and operation of buyer‐focused cells have hardly been investigate...
Price Competition and Cost Efficiency Facing Buyer's
Price Competition and Cost Efficiency Facing Buyer's
This paper studies a pricing game in which two sellers compete to sell a product to a customer with bounded rationality. The sellers have different production costs in determining ...
Implementation of Notary House Employment Agreements in the Selling of Land and Building
Implementation of Notary House Employment Agreements in the Selling of Land and Building
The research entitled "Implementation of Notary House Vacationing Agreements in the Sale and Purchase of Land and Buildings in Randudongkal Pemalang Regency", in order to find out ...
Avoiding the § 2-607(3)(A) Notice Trap: Reworking the Notice Requirement to the Third Party Manufacturer of Goods
Avoiding the § 2-607(3)(A) Notice Trap: Reworking the Notice Requirement to the Third Party Manufacturer of Goods
When a buyer accepts non-conforming goods, UCC § 2-607(3)(a) requires the buyer to notify the seller of the non-conformity within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers, or sh...
Second Sourcing vs. Sole Sourcing with Capacity Investment and Asymmetric Information
Second Sourcing vs. Sole Sourcing with Capacity Investment and Asymmetric Information
We study the decision of a manufacturer (the buyer), expecting new sourcing opportunities in the future, in selecting between sole- and second-sourcing strategies for a noncommodit...
Realizing the Asymmetric Index of a Graph
Realizing the Asymmetric Index of a Graph
A graph G is asymmetric if its automorphism group is trivial. Asymmetric graphs were introduced by Erd\H{o}s and R\'{e}nyi Erdos [1]. They suggested the problem of starting with ...

