Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Optimal hand surgery fellowship interview format
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Context
The ideal format for residency and fellowship interviews has been consistently debated. Secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions, including all hand surgery fellowship programs, transitioned interviews to an all-virtual format. In the past year, with ease of travel restrictions, some programs have transitioned back to in-person interviews, while others remain solely virtual. Hand surgery fellowship programs are continually assessing what are the best means for conducting these interviews, with little perspective regarding the applicant’s preferences.
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to examine hand surgery fellowship applicants’ perspectives regarding in-person and virtual interviews. It was hypothesized that applicants would value interpersonal relationships between faculty when deciding upon their ideal hand surgery fellowship, which would be easier to appreciate in-person.
Methods
All hand fellowship interviewees at a single institution were given a voluntary, electronic survey. The survey consisted of questions examining different aspects of the program’s interview day and supplemental resources. Responses were recorded after the in-person interview for the years 2018–2020. Questions were altered for the virtual 2021 and 2022 interviews. Questions were scored on a Likert scale.
Results
For the in-person interview cycles, there were 60/86 respondents (69.8 %). For the virtual interview cycles, there were 45/73 respondents (61.6 %). During the in-person interview cycles, applicants reported that the current fellows’ perspective talk was the most helpful component. Many applicants commented that they enjoyed meeting their potential co-fellows. The virtual interviewees felt that they had the best understanding of the program’s core values/culture and the worst understanding of faculty personalities and personal/family life. Twenty-nine (64.4 %) of virtual applicants would prefer an all in-person interview. Of the 16 respondents who did not advocate for a completely in-person interview, 56.3 % preferred the option for an in-person site visit.
Conclusions
Hand surgery fellowship applicants desire interpersonal interactions to better understand prospective fellowship programs, which can be difficult to convey with an all-virtual interview. The results of this survey can help guide fellowship programs as they continue to optimize in-person, virtual, and hybrid interview formats and refine recruitment resources.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: Optimal hand surgery fellowship interview format
Description:
Abstract
Context
The ideal format for residency and fellowship interviews has been consistently debated.
Secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions, including all hand surgery fellowship programs, transitioned interviews to an all-virtual format.
In the past year, with ease of travel restrictions, some programs have transitioned back to in-person interviews, while others remain solely virtual.
Hand surgery fellowship programs are continually assessing what are the best means for conducting these interviews, with little perspective regarding the applicant’s preferences.
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to examine hand surgery fellowship applicants’ perspectives regarding in-person and virtual interviews.
It was hypothesized that applicants would value interpersonal relationships between faculty when deciding upon their ideal hand surgery fellowship, which would be easier to appreciate in-person.
Methods
All hand fellowship interviewees at a single institution were given a voluntary, electronic survey.
The survey consisted of questions examining different aspects of the program’s interview day and supplemental resources.
Responses were recorded after the in-person interview for the years 2018–2020.
Questions were altered for the virtual 2021 and 2022 interviews.
Questions were scored on a Likert scale.
Results
For the in-person interview cycles, there were 60/86 respondents (69.
8 %).
For the virtual interview cycles, there were 45/73 respondents (61.
6 %).
During the in-person interview cycles, applicants reported that the current fellows’ perspective talk was the most helpful component.
Many applicants commented that they enjoyed meeting their potential co-fellows.
The virtual interviewees felt that they had the best understanding of the program’s core values/culture and the worst understanding of faculty personalities and personal/family life.
Twenty-nine (64.
4 %) of virtual applicants would prefer an all in-person interview.
Of the 16 respondents who did not advocate for a completely in-person interview, 56.
3 % preferred the option for an in-person site visit.
Conclusions
Hand surgery fellowship applicants desire interpersonal interactions to better understand prospective fellowship programs, which can be difficult to convey with an all-virtual interview.
The results of this survey can help guide fellowship programs as they continue to optimize in-person, virtual, and hybrid interview formats and refine recruitment resources.
Related Results
Factors Associated with Infectious Diseases Fellowship Academic Success
Factors Associated with Infectious Diseases Fellowship Academic Success
Abstract
Background: A multitude of factors are considered in an infectious diseases (ID) training program’s meticulous selection process of ID fellows but their correlatio...
Integrative Hematology Oncology Fellowship: A Descriptive Analysis of the First Accredited Program in the United States
Integrative Hematology Oncology Fellowship: A Descriptive Analysis of the First Accredited Program in the United States
Introduction:
The presence of integrative oncology programs in cancer care institutions is rapidly increasing globally, however specialized training in integrativ...
Factors important in laryngology fellow and laryngology fellowship selection
Factors important in laryngology fellow and laryngology fellowship selection
Objectives/HypothesisTo determine factors that laryngology fellowship directors believe are most important in choosing a fellow and that laryngology applicants believe are most imp...
Fellowship by the Numbers: Surgical Fellowship Applications in the United States
Fellowship by the Numbers: Surgical Fellowship Applications in the United States
Abstract
Purpose:
The majority of residents pursue fellowship following training in general surgery, especially at academic medical centers. However, there is no singular ...
Expectations Versus Reality: Understanding the Accuracy of Impressions Made During Virtual Interviews of Pediatric Pulmonary Fellowship Programs
Expectations Versus Reality: Understanding the Accuracy of Impressions Made During Virtual Interviews of Pediatric Pulmonary Fellowship Programs
Rationale: As a result of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, all pediatric
pulmonary fellowship programs conducted virtual interviews for the first
time in the Fall of 2020. This study aimed...
Evaluation of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) Fellowship Program Website Content and Quality
Evaluation of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) Fellowship Program Website Content and Quality
Purpose:
The qualities that applicants value in the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) fellowship programs have been studied, bu...
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Simulation Use Survey*
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Simulation Use Survey*
Objectives:
Simulation-based education is used in the U.S. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs, yet the prevalence and types of simulation used is unkn...
Analysis of Sex Diversity Within Orthopedic Trauma Surgery Fellowship Programs
Analysis of Sex Diversity Within Orthopedic Trauma Surgery Fellowship Programs
Background: Women continue to be underrepresented in orthopedic surgery and in orthopedic fellowship programs, especially in orthopedic trauma. Purpose: We aimed to assess sex dive...

