Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The common nature of ideology and mythology as an object of socio-philosophical analysis

View through CrossRef
In this study, the authors examine mythology and ideology, their nature and origin, as well as the processes of their relationship. It is argued that ideology and mythology are in many ways interrelated phenomena, but not reducible to each other. Between them, not imperative, but rather complimentary relations are established, when they borrow certain elements and structures of each other in the process of interaction. The commonality of their nature and origin is manifested in the commonality of their properties and functions. Ideology has two sides: rational and irrational. The study shows that the irrational side of ideology is no less important and has no less influence on the final consumers of ideology than its rational and scientific elements. The irrational side is expressed in the mythical, unconscious, affective and imaginary. The scientific novelty of the study consists in revealing the essence of ideological myths, designating myths in the structure of ideology, establishing the "mythomotorics" of ideology, as well as highlighting the main properties of ideology and mythology: spontaneity and chaotic origin; unorganised and a-centric character; deployment in different social fields and dimensions; transmission of the same message through several codes; comprehensive and all-encompassing impact on end-users; lack of complete clarity and eluding analysis; ritual and repetition. It is concluded that the functional role of myths in ideology is that they fill the void between the ideological system and the social order in places where they do not correspond or openly contradict each other.
Title: The common nature of ideology and mythology as an object of socio-philosophical analysis
Description:
In this study, the authors examine mythology and ideology, their nature and origin, as well as the processes of their relationship.
It is argued that ideology and mythology are in many ways interrelated phenomena, but not reducible to each other.
Between them, not imperative, but rather complimentary relations are established, when they borrow certain elements and structures of each other in the process of interaction.
The commonality of their nature and origin is manifested in the commonality of their properties and functions.
Ideology has two sides: rational and irrational.
The study shows that the irrational side of ideology is no less important and has no less influence on the final consumers of ideology than its rational and scientific elements.
The irrational side is expressed in the mythical, unconscious, affective and imaginary.
The scientific novelty of the study consists in revealing the essence of ideological myths, designating myths in the structure of ideology, establishing the "mythomotorics" of ideology, as well as highlighting the main properties of ideology and mythology: spontaneity and chaotic origin; unorganised and a-centric character; deployment in different social fields and dimensions; transmission of the same message through several codes; comprehensive and all-encompassing impact on end-users; lack of complete clarity and eluding analysis; ritual and repetition.
It is concluded that the functional role of myths in ideology is that they fill the void between the ideological system and the social order in places where they do not correspond or openly contradict each other.

Related Results

The term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries: the specifics of its existence
The term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries: the specifics of its existence
The article is devoted to the specifics of existence of the term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries. The foreign texts, which contain the t...
General characterization of ideological semiology based on Roland Barthes’ semiological theory
General characterization of ideological semiology based on Roland Barthes’ semiological theory
This article presents a semiological analysis of ideology on the basis of R. Barthes’ semiological theory. The subject of the study is ideology as a semiological system. R. Barthes...
Mythology
Mythology
Abstract In general mythology refers to several things. At its base are myths, and therefore mythology first means the received corpus of muthoi ...
Ideology as a Sign System: Semiological Analysis
Ideology as a Sign System: Semiological Analysis
Introduction. This article substantiates the possibility of semiological analysis in relation to ideology on the basis of the semiological theory of R. Barthes. The subject of the ...
IDEOLOGI BAHASA POLITIK SOEKARNO: SARANA KETAHANAN, KEAMANAN, DAN PERDAMAIAN INDONESIA
IDEOLOGI BAHASA POLITIK SOEKARNO: SARANA KETAHANAN, KEAMANAN, DAN PERDAMAIAN INDONESIA
The current study aims at: (1) to explore the ideology conceived in Soekarno’s political language as one of the nation founding fathers and the proclaimer of Indonesia independence...
Socio-Hydrogeology: uncovering the hidden connections within the Human-Groundwater Cycle
Socio-Hydrogeology: uncovering the hidden connections within the Human-Groundwater Cycle
<p>Socio-hydrogeology has been recently proposed as a new approach in the field of human-water research, focusing on the assessment of the reciprocity between people ...
Depth-aware salient object segmentation
Depth-aware salient object segmentation
Object segmentation is an important task which is widely employed in many computer vision applications such as object detection, tracking, recognition, and ret...
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
<p>A dominant claim in the philosophical literature on trust is that we should stop thinking in terms of group trustworthiness or appropriate trust in groups. In this paper, ...

Back to Top