Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Misdemeanor Prosecution
View through CrossRef
Communities across the United States are reconsidering the public safety benefits of prosecuting nonviolent misdemeanor offenses, yet there is little empirical evidence to inform policy in this area. In this paper we report the first estimates of the causal effects of misdemeanor prosecution on defendants’ subsequent criminal justice involvement. We leverage the as-if random assignment of nonviolent misdemeanor cases to Assistant District Attorneys (ADAs) who decide whether a case should be prosecuted in the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office in Massachusetts. These ADAs vary in the average leniency of their prosecution decisions. We find that, for the marginal defendant, nonprosecution of a nonviolent misdemeanor offense leads to a 53% reduction in the likelihood of a new criminal complaint, and to a 60% reduction in the number of new criminal complaints, over the next two years. These local average treatment effects are largest for defendants without prior criminal records, suggesting that averting criminal record acquisition is an important mechanism driving our findings. We also present evidence that a recent policy change in Suffolk County imposing a presumption of nonprosecution for nonviolent misdemeanor offenses had similar beneficial effects, decreasing the likelihood of subsequent criminal justice involvement.
Title: Misdemeanor Prosecution
Description:
Communities across the United States are reconsidering the public safety benefits of prosecuting nonviolent misdemeanor offenses, yet there is little empirical evidence to inform policy in this area.
In this paper we report the first estimates of the causal effects of misdemeanor prosecution on defendants’ subsequent criminal justice involvement.
We leverage the as-if random assignment of nonviolent misdemeanor cases to Assistant District Attorneys (ADAs) who decide whether a case should be prosecuted in the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office in Massachusetts.
These ADAs vary in the average leniency of their prosecution decisions.
We find that, for the marginal defendant, nonprosecution of a nonviolent misdemeanor offense leads to a 53% reduction in the likelihood of a new criminal complaint, and to a 60% reduction in the number of new criminal complaints, over the next two years.
These local average treatment effects are largest for defendants without prior criminal records, suggesting that averting criminal record acquisition is an important mechanism driving our findings.
We also present evidence that a recent policy change in Suffolk County imposing a presumption of nonprosecution for nonviolent misdemeanor offenses had similar beneficial effects, decreasing the likelihood of subsequent criminal justice involvement.
Related Results
SOME ISSUES OF THE DEFINITION OF MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE AND ITS TYPES
SOME ISSUES OF THE DEFINITION OF MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE AND ITS TYPES
On January 1, 2020, Law of Ukraine No. 2617-VIII «On Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Simplification of Pre-Trial Investigation of Certain Criminal Offense Categor...
Misdemeanor Prosecution
Misdemeanor Prosecution
Communities across the United States are reconsidering the public safety benefits of prosecuting nonviolent misdemeanor offenses. So far there has been little empirical evidence to...
Misdemeanor Prosecution
Misdemeanor Prosecution
Abstract
Communities across the United States are reconsidering the public safety benefits of prosecuting nonviolent misdemeanor offenses, yet there is little empiri...
Confronting with the Prosecution
Confronting with the Prosecution
Confronting criminal investigation activity cannot always be qualified as illegal activity of some participants in the criminal process. The right to defense in the criminal proces...
The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution
The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution
Corporate crime continues to occur at an alarming rate, yet disagreement persists among scholars and practitioners about the role of corporate criminal prosecution. Some argue that...
Reconstruction of the Termination of Prosecution of Corruption Offences Public Prosecutor's Discretion
Reconstruction of the Termination of Prosecution of Corruption Offences Public Prosecutor's Discretion
Corruption cases that result in small state financial losses continue to end up in the Corruption Court without alternative solutions that are faster, simpler and cheaper, even tho...
Harmonizing Prosecution History Estoppel and the Doctrine of Equivalents in Patent Infringement Actions
Harmonizing Prosecution History Estoppel and the Doctrine of Equivalents in Patent Infringement Actions
The patent law's doctrines of prosecution history estoppel and equivalents have come head on in the Court of Appeals for the Federal District's decision Festo Corporation v. Shoket...
An Examination of the Institutions of Investigation and Prosecution in Iranian Criminal Law and English Law
An Examination of the Institutions of Investigation and Prosecution in Iranian Criminal Law and English Law
Preliminary investigations and prosecution are legal prerogatives of prosecutorial authorities and the police, functioning as human instruments in the procedural stages of criminal...

