Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Assessing lead curtains’ impact on radiation protection in coronary interventions

View through CrossRef
Abstract The objective of this investigation is to assess the impact of supplementary lead curtains on the reduction of radiation dose exposure to operators during coronary interventional procedures. Seven standard positions during coronary angiography (foot, right foot, head, left foot, left lateral, left head, and right lateral) were simulated on a standard anthropomorphic phantom with radial artery access. Measurements were taken at two different heights, 125 cm and 155 cm, and dosimeters were used to measured surface incident dose rates for the first and second operators, both with and without additional lead curtains at various positions. Each position was measured 20 times, and arithmetic means were computed. A t-test was utilised to compare dose rates with and without supplementary lead curtains, as well as dose rates with additional lead curtains at varying heights. The finding indicate that the dose rates of the first operator with supplementary lead curtains were not significantly lower compared to those without, except for the 125 cm head and left foot positions and the 155 cm head position with the additional lead curtain edge 10 cm below the umbilical level (t umbilical = 0.9, 0.4, 0.5, P > 0.05). The dose rates of the second operator with additional lead curtains were significantly lower than those without, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The arithmetic mean dose rates for the first and second operators at each position were lowest when the upper edge of the additional lead curtain was situated 10 cm above the umbilical level. Employing supplementary lead curtains during coronary interventions effectively reduces radiation doses received by operators. The protective effect is enhanced when the additional lead curtain is closer to the irradiation field. Hence, it is recommended that additional curtains be employed judiciously, while ensuring that clinical procedures are not impeded, in order to effectively mitigate the radiation exposure of operators.
Title: Assessing lead curtains’ impact on radiation protection in coronary interventions
Description:
Abstract The objective of this investigation is to assess the impact of supplementary lead curtains on the reduction of radiation dose exposure to operators during coronary interventional procedures.
Seven standard positions during coronary angiography (foot, right foot, head, left foot, left lateral, left head, and right lateral) were simulated on a standard anthropomorphic phantom with radial artery access.
Measurements were taken at two different heights, 125 cm and 155 cm, and dosimeters were used to measured surface incident dose rates for the first and second operators, both with and without additional lead curtains at various positions.
Each position was measured 20 times, and arithmetic means were computed.
A t-test was utilised to compare dose rates with and without supplementary lead curtains, as well as dose rates with additional lead curtains at varying heights.
The finding indicate that the dose rates of the first operator with supplementary lead curtains were not significantly lower compared to those without, except for the 125 cm head and left foot positions and the 155 cm head position with the additional lead curtain edge 10 cm below the umbilical level (t umbilical = 0.
9, 0.
4, 0.
5, P > 0.
05).
The dose rates of the second operator with additional lead curtains were significantly lower than those without, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.
05).
The arithmetic mean dose rates for the first and second operators at each position were lowest when the upper edge of the additional lead curtain was situated 10 cm above the umbilical level.
Employing supplementary lead curtains during coronary interventions effectively reduces radiation doses received by operators.
The protective effect is enhanced when the additional lead curtain is closer to the irradiation field.
Hence, it is recommended that additional curtains be employed judiciously, while ensuring that clinical procedures are not impeded, in order to effectively mitigate the radiation exposure of operators.

Related Results

Secret of radiation protection and anti-static clothing
Secret of radiation protection and anti-static clothing
In the current era, electromagnetic radiation is everywhere. Every day electromagnetic radiation and static electricity caused by a variety of hazards. So, anti-electromagnetic rad...
A study on risk factors of coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city
A study on risk factors of coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city
Objective To investigate the relationship between risk factors and coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city, and to provide scientific basis for preventing and ...
e0379 Study of correlationship between myeloperoxidase paraoxonase and coron
e0379 Study of correlationship between myeloperoxidase paraoxonase and coron
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of myeloperoxidase (MPO)and paraoxonase (PON1) in coronary heart disease (CHD). ...
The effects of transcatheter closure of coronary-pulmonary arterial fistulas in adults
The effects of transcatheter closure of coronary-pulmonary arterial fistulas in adults
Objective Congenital coronary artery fistula (CAF) is an extremely rare congenital anomaly of the coronary artery. We report our experience with Tran catheter occ...
e0436 Clinical Study on Relationship between the Plasma LTB4 levels and Unstable plaque in Acute Coronary Syndrome
e0436 Clinical Study on Relationship between the Plasma LTB4 levels and Unstable plaque in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Objective To explore the association between plasma Leukotriene B4 (LT-B4) and the severity of coronary artery lesions in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. ...

Back to Top