Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Education, Indoctrination, and Mass Mobilization in Autocracies

View through CrossRef
In this article, we assess whether regime efforts at formal educational indoctrination affect&nbsp;mass mobilization in autocracies. While the literature often emphasizes the democratizing&nbsp;potential of education, mass schooling also offers a conduit for delivering pro-government&nbsp;propaganda aimed at indoctrinating the population. This strategy could directly affect&nbsp;mass mobilization by persuading citizens to support the regime or indirectly if citizens&nbsp;think others are persuaded. Propaganda through educational curriculum may also signal&nbsp;the regime’s strength, thereby reducing anti-government mobilization through dominance.&nbsp;Thus, formal education may undermine the democratic character of mass mobilization in&nbsp;authoritarian settings, particularly when education has higher indoctrination potential.<br><br>We test whether this is the case, drawing on a sample of autocratic spells from 1950&nbsp;to 2019. We find that education indoctrination potential is associated with less mass&nbsp;mobilization. In particular, the evidence shows that autocracies tend to experience less&nbsp;intense pro-democracy mobilization and a lower probability of an anti-system movement&nbsp;when they invest more in educational indoctrination. By contrast, educational indoctrination&nbsp;policies are associated with higher mobilization for autocracy, all else equal. This&nbsp;suggests that formal indoctrination helps insulate autocrats from bottom-up pressures&nbsp;for democratization and rally support through pro-government demonstrations.
Title: Education, Indoctrination, and Mass Mobilization in Autocracies
Description:
In this article, we assess whether regime efforts at formal educational indoctrination affect&nbsp;mass mobilization in autocracies.
While the literature often emphasizes the democratizing&nbsp;potential of education, mass schooling also offers a conduit for delivering pro-government&nbsp;propaganda aimed at indoctrinating the population.
This strategy could directly affect&nbsp;mass mobilization by persuading citizens to support the regime or indirectly if citizens&nbsp;think others are persuaded.
Propaganda through educational curriculum may also signal&nbsp;the regime’s strength, thereby reducing anti-government mobilization through dominance.
&nbsp;Thus, formal education may undermine the democratic character of mass mobilization in&nbsp;authoritarian settings, particularly when education has higher indoctrination potential.
<br><br>We test whether this is the case, drawing on a sample of autocratic spells from 1950&nbsp;to 2019.
We find that education indoctrination potential is associated with less mass&nbsp;mobilization.
In particular, the evidence shows that autocracies tend to experience less&nbsp;intense pro-democracy mobilization and a lower probability of an anti-system movement&nbsp;when they invest more in educational indoctrination.
By contrast, educational indoctrination&nbsp;policies are associated with higher mobilization for autocracy, all else equal.
This&nbsp;suggests that formal indoctrination helps insulate autocrats from bottom-up pressures&nbsp;for democratization and rally support through pro-government demonstrations.

Related Results

The Black Mass as Play: Dennis Wheatley's The Devil Rides Out
The Black Mass as Play: Dennis Wheatley's The Devil Rides Out
Literature—at least serious literature—is something that we work at. This is especially true within the academy. Literature departments are places where workers labour over texts c...
The Price of Silence: Fiscal Capacity and Mass Anti-Regime Mobilization in Autocracies
The Price of Silence: Fiscal Capacity and Mass Anti-Regime Mobilization in Autocracies
Why do some autocracies experience violent anti-regime mobilization while others remain quiescent? The literature does not provide sufficient theoretical arguments and empirical ev...
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare inflammatory breast disease that mimics carcinoma. GM can coexist with breast cancer (BC), though the relationship rema...
The Legitimation of Repression in Autocracies
The Legitimation of Repression in Autocracies
Abstract In research on authoritarianism, both legitimation and repression have received growing attention since the late 2000s. However, these two strategies of ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
HO CHI MINH’S PERSPECTIVE ON “SKILFUL MASS MOBILIZATION” AND ITS APPLICATION IN DA NANG CITY
HO CHI MINH’S PERSPECTIVE ON “SKILFUL MASS MOBILIZATION” AND ITS APPLICATION IN DA NANG CITY
President Ho Chi Minh greatly emphasized mass mobilization while leading the Vietnamese revolution. He developed profound perspectives on “Skilful Mass Mobilization”, highlighting ...
Educational Institutions and Indoctrination
Educational Institutions and Indoctrination
AbstractThe concept of indoctrination is typically used to characterize the actions of individual educators. However, it has become increasingly common for citizens to raise concer...

Back to Top