Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Results of halter cervical traction for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: retrospective review of 81 patients

View through CrossRef
Object The percentage of patients responding to conservative treatment for cervical radiculopathy secondary to nerve root compression is not well quantified. To clarify this question, the authors retrospectively reviewed the records obtained over a 4-year period in patients with cervical radiculopathy to determine their response to conservative measures (cervical collar therapy and halter cervical traction). Methods Cervical radiculopathy was diagnosed in patients if they suffered from radiating arm pain made worse by neck movement and at least one of the following: reflex loss, dermatomal numbness, and/or myotomal weakness. Patients with neck pain alone or arm pain without neurological deficit were excluded from analysis. Those patients without excruciating pain, severe weakness, or evidence of myelopathy were offered a course of halter traction before surgery was to be considered. Ninety-six patients met the inclusion criteria; there were 61 males and 35 females, and the mean age was 47 years. Fifty-five patients presented with C-7, 37 with C-6, two with C-5, and two with C-8 radiculopathy. Eighty-one patients underwent a trial of traction that consisted of wearing a cervical collar and home-based halter cervical traction: 8 to 12 pounds, applied for 15 minutes, three times a day for 3 to 6 weeks The mean duration of symptoms prior to neurosurgical evaluation was 43 days ± 8.3 days (standard deviation). Sixty-three (78%) of 81 patients responded to therapeutic traction, experiencing significant or total pain relief, three could not tolerate the traction, and traction failed in 15 patients. Of the 81 patients in whom traction was undertaken, 78 underwent magnetic resonance imaging prior to being seen, which revealed herniated discs at the corresponding levels in 71 and foraminal stenosis in seven. Three of the 63 patients in whom an initial response to traction was noted suffered recurrence of symptoms and required surgery. It would appear that in patients in whom symptoms of cervical radiculopathy were present for approximately 6 weeks that 75% will respond to further conservative treatment (halter traction and cervical collar) over the next 6 weeks.
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Title: Results of halter cervical traction for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: retrospective review of 81 patients
Description:
Object The percentage of patients responding to conservative treatment for cervical radiculopathy secondary to nerve root compression is not well quantified.
To clarify this question, the authors retrospectively reviewed the records obtained over a 4-year period in patients with cervical radiculopathy to determine their response to conservative measures (cervical collar therapy and halter cervical traction).
Methods Cervical radiculopathy was diagnosed in patients if they suffered from radiating arm pain made worse by neck movement and at least one of the following: reflex loss, dermatomal numbness, and/or myotomal weakness.
Patients with neck pain alone or arm pain without neurological deficit were excluded from analysis.
Those patients without excruciating pain, severe weakness, or evidence of myelopathy were offered a course of halter traction before surgery was to be considered.
Ninety-six patients met the inclusion criteria; there were 61 males and 35 females, and the mean age was 47 years.
Fifty-five patients presented with C-7, 37 with C-6, two with C-5, and two with C-8 radiculopathy.
Eighty-one patients underwent a trial of traction that consisted of wearing a cervical collar and home-based halter cervical traction: 8 to 12 pounds, applied for 15 minutes, three times a day for 3 to 6 weeks The mean duration of symptoms prior to neurosurgical evaluation was 43 days ± 8.
3 days (standard deviation).
Sixty-three (78%) of 81 patients responded to therapeutic traction, experiencing significant or total pain relief, three could not tolerate the traction, and traction failed in 15 patients.
Of the 81 patients in whom traction was undertaken, 78 underwent magnetic resonance imaging prior to being seen, which revealed herniated discs at the corresponding levels in 71 and foraminal stenosis in seven.
Three of the 63 patients in whom an initial response to traction was noted suffered recurrence of symptoms and required surgery.
It would appear that in patients in whom symptoms of cervical radiculopathy were present for approximately 6 weeks that 75% will respond to further conservative treatment (halter traction and cervical collar) over the next 6 weeks.

Related Results

Effect of cervical suspensory traction in the treatment of severe cervical kyphotic deformity
Effect of cervical suspensory traction in the treatment of severe cervical kyphotic deformity
ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate a new noninvasive traction method on the treatment of severe cervical kyphotic deformity.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with severe c...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Prevalence of cervical radiculopathy among teachers
Prevalence of cervical radiculopathy among teachers
Abstract:Background: Pinched nerves, or cervical radiculopathy, are caused by damage to the nerves or changes in the way they function. A nerve root close to the cervical ver...
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy
Background: Cervical radiculopathy is a disorder marked by pain, motor, and/or sensory impairment that is caused by compression of one or more of the cervical nerve roots. The two ...
Biofeedback traction versus conventional traction in cervical radiculopathy
Biofeedback traction versus conventional traction in cervical radiculopathy
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the cervical traction modality with and without electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback for neck muscles in pati...
Clinical evaluation of the effect of Ayurvedic oil enema therapy in the management of Cervical Radiculopathy
Clinical evaluation of the effect of Ayurvedic oil enema therapy in the management of Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Radiculopathy (CR), a common cause due to nerve compression. CR occurs when one or more nerves are impaired. When the motor nerves are compressed, it causes pain in the ar...

Back to Top