Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Resilience after adversity: an umbrella review of adversity protective factors and resilience-promoting interventions

View through CrossRef
IntroductionResilience is the dynamic adaptive process of maintaining or recovering mental health from stressors, such as trauma, challenging life circumstances, critical transitions, or physical illnesses. Resilience after adversity can be fostered through protective factors and the implementation of interventions that promote resilience. Hence, it is essential to investigate both protective and vulnerable factors to reduce the negative effects of unfavorable life events and increase resilience through positive risk-response interventions.ObjectiveTo assess the effect of previous adversity, protecting factors, and resilience-promoting interventions to possess resilience after adversity in a global context.MethodsThe study included English language articles sourced from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Sciences, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Google Scholar published before 15 April 2024. These articles reported the effect of adversity, protecting factors, and/or resilience-promoting interventions to possess resilience after adversity in a global context without a population age limitation. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews. A weighted inverse-variance random-effects model was applied to find the pooled estimates. The subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis were also assessed.ResultsA total of 44 articles (n = 556,920 participants) were included in this umbrella review. From the random-effects model analysis, the pooled effect of adversity on the development of resilience was 0.25 (p < 0.001). The pooled effects of adversity-protective factors and resilience-promoting interventions after adversity were 0.31 (p < 0.001) and 0.42 (p < 0.001), respectively. The pooled effects of specific adversity protective factors were 0.26, 0.09, 0.05, 0.34, 0.23, and 0.43 for the availability of support, cognitive ability, community cohesion, positive self-perception, religious involvement, and self-regulation, respectively. The pooled effects of specific resilience-promoting interventions were 0.30, 0.21, 0.51, and 0.52 for cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) interventions, mindfulness-based interventions, mixed interventions, and resilience-promoting interventions, respectively.ConclusionThe findings of this umbrella review revealed that people who experienced early adversity can develop resilience later in life. The study highlights the need to consider adversity protective factors, such as availability of support (family, friends, and school), cognitive ability, community cohesion, positive self-perception, religious involvement, and self-regulation, and resilience-promoting interventions, including CBT interventions, mindfulness-based interventions, and mixed interventions, to enhance resilience promotion programs.
Title: Resilience after adversity: an umbrella review of adversity protective factors and resilience-promoting interventions
Description:
IntroductionResilience is the dynamic adaptive process of maintaining or recovering mental health from stressors, such as trauma, challenging life circumstances, critical transitions, or physical illnesses.
Resilience after adversity can be fostered through protective factors and the implementation of interventions that promote resilience.
Hence, it is essential to investigate both protective and vulnerable factors to reduce the negative effects of unfavorable life events and increase resilience through positive risk-response interventions.
ObjectiveTo assess the effect of previous adversity, protecting factors, and resilience-promoting interventions to possess resilience after adversity in a global context.
MethodsThe study included English language articles sourced from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Sciences, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Google Scholar published before 15 April 2024.
These articles reported the effect of adversity, protecting factors, and/or resilience-promoting interventions to possess resilience after adversity in a global context without a population age limitation.
The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews.
A weighted inverse-variance random-effects model was applied to find the pooled estimates.
The subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis were also assessed.
ResultsA total of 44 articles (n = 556,920 participants) were included in this umbrella review.
From the random-effects model analysis, the pooled effect of adversity on the development of resilience was 0.
25 (p < 0.
001).
The pooled effects of adversity-protective factors and resilience-promoting interventions after adversity were 0.
31 (p < 0.
001) and 0.
42 (p < 0.
001), respectively.
The pooled effects of specific adversity protective factors were 0.
26, 0.
09, 0.
05, 0.
34, 0.
23, and 0.
43 for the availability of support, cognitive ability, community cohesion, positive self-perception, religious involvement, and self-regulation, respectively.
The pooled effects of specific resilience-promoting interventions were 0.
30, 0.
21, 0.
51, and 0.
52 for cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) interventions, mindfulness-based interventions, mixed interventions, and resilience-promoting interventions, respectively.
ConclusionThe findings of this umbrella review revealed that people who experienced early adversity can develop resilience later in life.
The study highlights the need to consider adversity protective factors, such as availability of support (family, friends, and school), cognitive ability, community cohesion, positive self-perception, religious involvement, and self-regulation, and resilience-promoting interventions, including CBT interventions, mindfulness-based interventions, and mixed interventions, to enhance resilience promotion programs.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Psychological resilience in healthcare workers: A review of strategies and intervention
Psychological resilience in healthcare workers: A review of strategies and intervention
Healthcare workers face numerous stressors in their demanding and often emotionally taxing roles. The importance of psychological resilience in mitigating the impact of these stres...
Defying adversity creatively: Analysis of film characters
Defying adversity creatively: Analysis of film characters
Among many possibilities, resilience can be defined as building creative solutions in the face of adversity, creative response to the crisis, or even application of lateral thinkin...
The concept of resilience- the scientific adaptation for society health
The concept of resilience- the scientific adaptation for society health
The main idea of the paper to indicate the factors of resilience indicators. The task of the research - a theoretical analysis of the latest research resilience factors and resilie...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Flourishing in Resonance: Joint Resilience Building Through Music and Motion
Flourishing in Resonance: Joint Resilience Building Through Music and Motion
Worldwide, children face adverse childhood experiences, being exposed to risks ranging from, exposure to political violence and forced migration over the deleterious effects of cli...

Back to Top