Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Implementation and Effectiveness of a Learning Collaborative to Improve Palliative Care for Seriously Ill Hemodialysis Patients
View through CrossRef
Background and objectives
Limited implementation of palliative care practices in hemodialysis may contribute to end-of-life care that is intensive and not patient centered. We determined whether a learning collaborative for hemodialysis center providers improved delivery of palliative care best practices.
Design, setting, participants, & measurements
Ten US hemodialysis centers participated in a pre-post study targeting seriously ill patients between April 2019 and September 2020. Three practices were prioritized: screening for serious illness, goals of care discussions, and use of a palliative dialysis care pathway. The collaborative educational bundle consisted of learning sessions, communication skills training, and implementation support. The primary outcome was change in the probability of complete advance care planning documentation among seriously ill patients. Health care utilization was a secondary outcome, and implementation outcomes of acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and penetration were assessed using mixed methods.
Results
One center dropped out due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Among the remaining nine centers, 20% (273 of 1395) of patients were identified as seriously ill preimplementation, and 16% (203 of 1254) were identified as seriously ill postimplementation. From the preimplementation to postimplementation period, the adjusted probability of complete advance care planning documentation among seriously ill patients increased by 34.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval, 4.4 to 68.5). There was no difference in mortality or in utilization of palliative hemodialysis, hospice referral, or hemodialysis discontinuation. Screening for serious illness was widely adopted, and goals of care discussions were adopted with incomplete integration. There was limited adoption of a palliative dialysis care pathway.
Conclusions
A learning collaborative for hemodialysis centers spanning the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was associated with adoption of serious illness screening and goals of care discussions as well as improved documentation of advance care planning for seriously ill patients.
Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:
Pathways Project: Kidney Supportive Care, NCT04125537
Title: Implementation and Effectiveness of a Learning Collaborative to Improve Palliative Care for Seriously Ill Hemodialysis Patients
Description:
Background and objectives
Limited implementation of palliative care practices in hemodialysis may contribute to end-of-life care that is intensive and not patient centered.
We determined whether a learning collaborative for hemodialysis center providers improved delivery of palliative care best practices.
Design, setting, participants, & measurements
Ten US hemodialysis centers participated in a pre-post study targeting seriously ill patients between April 2019 and September 2020.
Three practices were prioritized: screening for serious illness, goals of care discussions, and use of a palliative dialysis care pathway.
The collaborative educational bundle consisted of learning sessions, communication skills training, and implementation support.
The primary outcome was change in the probability of complete advance care planning documentation among seriously ill patients.
Health care utilization was a secondary outcome, and implementation outcomes of acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and penetration were assessed using mixed methods.
Results
One center dropped out due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Among the remaining nine centers, 20% (273 of 1395) of patients were identified as seriously ill preimplementation, and 16% (203 of 1254) were identified as seriously ill postimplementation.
From the preimplementation to postimplementation period, the adjusted probability of complete advance care planning documentation among seriously ill patients increased by 34.
5 percentage points (95% confidence interval, 4.
4 to 68.
5).
There was no difference in mortality or in utilization of palliative hemodialysis, hospice referral, or hemodialysis discontinuation.
Screening for serious illness was widely adopted, and goals of care discussions were adopted with incomplete integration.
There was limited adoption of a palliative dialysis care pathway.
Conclusions
A learning collaborative for hemodialysis centers spanning the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was associated with adoption of serious illness screening and goals of care discussions as well as improved documentation of advance care planning for seriously ill patients.
Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:
Pathways Project: Kidney Supportive Care, NCT04125537.
Related Results
Harmonizing Palliative Care: National Survey to Evaluate the Knowledge and Attitude of Emergency Physicians towards Palliative Care
Harmonizing Palliative Care: National Survey to Evaluate the Knowledge and Attitude of Emergency Physicians towards Palliative Care
Background and Aim
Although the challenges of integrating palliative care practices across care settings are real and well recognized until now little is known ab...
Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis
Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis
Background:
Palliative care units and specialised palliative home care teams are well established in many countries. Palliative day-care clinics, however, are n...
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Background All the palliative care needs of a population cannot be met by specialist palliative care clinicians and teams alone. Both primary-level and specialist-level palliative ...
Organization of Palliative Care Provision in the Palliative Care Department During War Time
Organization of Palliative Care Provision in the Palliative Care Department During War Time
The city of Kyiv is characterized by a high level (258.6 cases per 100,000 population) of cancer incidence and mortality.
The objective: to determine the problem and prospects of p...
Dementia patients in palliative care according to data from the German National Hospice and Palliative Care Register (2009–2021)
Dementia patients in palliative care according to data from the German National Hospice and Palliative Care Register (2009–2021)
Abstract
Background
People with dementia are less in focus of palliative care research than other patient groups even though the awareness of their ...
Does Inpatient Palliative Care Facilitate Home-Based Palliative Care Postdischarge? A Retrospective Cohort Study
Does Inpatient Palliative Care Facilitate Home-Based Palliative Care Postdischarge? A Retrospective Cohort Study
Introduction:
Evidence of the impact of inpatient palliative care on receiving home-based palliative care remains limited.
...
Abstract C001: Racial and hospital factors affecting palliative care utilization in advanced cancer: An analysis of the NIS database
Abstract C001: Racial and hospital factors affecting palliative care utilization in advanced cancer: An analysis of the NIS database
Abstract
Background:
Palliative care significantly enhances the quality of life for patients with advanced cancer by addressing ...
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
This article examines the results of two studies conducted in Atlantic Canada to evaluate people’s understanding of palliative care. In Study 1, a sample of adults were asked to re...

