Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Preventive Hoof Trimming and Animal-Based Welfare Measures Influence the Time to First Lameness Event and Hoof Lesion Prevalence in Dairy Cows
View through CrossRef
Background: The objectives of this study were to, (1) investigate the impact of the Dutch five-step hoof trimming (HT) technique on time to lameness and hoof lesion prevalence in grazing (GR) and non-grazing (NGR) dairy cows, and (2) determine the association between potential benefits of HT and animal-based welfare measures during lactation. A total of 520 non-lame cows without hoof lesions from 5 dairy farms (GR = 2, NGR = 3) were enrolled at early (within 30 days in milk; DIM) and late lactation (above 200 DIM), and randomly allocated to either trimmed (HGR or HNGR) or control groups (CON-GR and CON-NGR). Locomotion scores, body condition, hock condition, leg hygiene, and hoof health were assessed at monthly intervals until the following 270 days in milk. The data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariable Cox, and logistic regression models. The overall incidence rate of lameness was 36.2 cases/100 cows/month, with corresponding rates of 27.4, 31.9, 48.4, and 45.8 cases/100 cows/month in HGR, HNGR, CON-GR, and CON-NGR, respectively. Time to first lameness event was significantly higher in HGR (mean ± S.E; 8.12 ± 0.15) compared to CON-GR (7.36 ± 0.26), and in HNGR (8.05 ± 0.16) compared to CON-NGR (7.39 ± 0.23). The prevalence of hoof lesions in the enrolled cows was 36.9%, with a higher occurrence in CON-GR (48.8%) than HGR (23.2%), and in CON-NGR (52.6%) compared to HNGR (32.2%). The majority of hoof lesions were non-infectious in grazing (HGR vs. CON-GR; 21.3 vs. 33.3%) and non-grazing herds (HNGR vs. CON-NGR; 25.0 vs. 40.4%). The risk of lameness was higher in underconditioned cows (Hazard ratio; HR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.2–7.4), presence of hoof lesion (HR = 33.1, 95% CI 17.6–62.5), and there was variation between farms. Aside HT, lower parity (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.8), normal hock condition (OR = 0.06; 95% 0.01–0.29), and absence of overgrown hoof (OR = 0.4; 95% 0.2–0.7) were protective against non-infectious hoof lesions. Functional HT is beneficial as a lameness preventive strategy during lactation; however, ensuring older cows are in good body condition and free from hock injuries are equally important.
Title: Preventive Hoof Trimming and Animal-Based Welfare Measures Influence the Time to First Lameness Event and Hoof Lesion Prevalence in Dairy Cows
Description:
Background: The objectives of this study were to, (1) investigate the impact of the Dutch five-step hoof trimming (HT) technique on time to lameness and hoof lesion prevalence in grazing (GR) and non-grazing (NGR) dairy cows, and (2) determine the association between potential benefits of HT and animal-based welfare measures during lactation.
A total of 520 non-lame cows without hoof lesions from 5 dairy farms (GR = 2, NGR = 3) were enrolled at early (within 30 days in milk; DIM) and late lactation (above 200 DIM), and randomly allocated to either trimmed (HGR or HNGR) or control groups (CON-GR and CON-NGR).
Locomotion scores, body condition, hock condition, leg hygiene, and hoof health were assessed at monthly intervals until the following 270 days in milk.
The data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariable Cox, and logistic regression models.
The overall incidence rate of lameness was 36.
2 cases/100 cows/month, with corresponding rates of 27.
4, 31.
9, 48.
4, and 45.
8 cases/100 cows/month in HGR, HNGR, CON-GR, and CON-NGR, respectively.
Time to first lameness event was significantly higher in HGR (mean ± S.
E; 8.
12 ± 0.
15) compared to CON-GR (7.
36 ± 0.
26), and in HNGR (8.
05 ± 0.
16) compared to CON-NGR (7.
39 ± 0.
23).
The prevalence of hoof lesions in the enrolled cows was 36.
9%, with a higher occurrence in CON-GR (48.
8%) than HGR (23.
2%), and in CON-NGR (52.
6%) compared to HNGR (32.
2%).
The majority of hoof lesions were non-infectious in grazing (HGR vs.
CON-GR; 21.
3 vs.
33.
3%) and non-grazing herds (HNGR vs.
CON-NGR; 25.
0 vs.
40.
4%).
The risk of lameness was higher in underconditioned cows (Hazard ratio; HR = 3.
1, 95% CI 1.
2–7.
4), presence of hoof lesion (HR = 33.
1, 95% CI 17.
6–62.
5), and there was variation between farms.
Aside HT, lower parity (OR = 0.
4, 95% CI 0.
2–0.
8), normal hock condition (OR = 0.
06; 95% 0.
01–0.
29), and absence of overgrown hoof (OR = 0.
4; 95% 0.
2–0.
7) were protective against non-infectious hoof lesions.
Functional HT is beneficial as a lameness preventive strategy during lactation; however, ensuring older cows are in good body condition and free from hock injuries are equally important.
Related Results
Biochemical Profile and Productive Performance in Dairy Cows with Lameness During Postpartum Period
Biochemical Profile and Productive Performance in Dairy Cows with Lameness During Postpartum Period
Background: Lameness in dairy cows is classified as a gait change caused by multifactorial process. The phase of the peripartum causes intense physiological changes for the adaptat...
Prevalence and risk factors for lameness in dairy cattle on selected farms located in Dessie and Kombolcha, Northeast Ethiopia
Prevalence and risk factors for lameness in dairy cattle on selected farms located in Dessie and Kombolcha, Northeast Ethiopia
BackgroundLameness in dairy cattle has continued to be a significant burden for farmers in modern dairy production due to its impact on animal welfare and productivity. A cross-sec...
Association between Lameness and Indicators of Dairy Cow Welfare Based on Locomotion Scoring, Body and Hock Condition, Leg Hygiene and Lying Behavior
Association between Lameness and Indicators of Dairy Cow Welfare Based on Locomotion Scoring, Body and Hock Condition, Leg Hygiene and Lying Behavior
Dairy cow welfare is an important consideration for optimal production in the dairy industry. Lameness affects the welfare of dairy herds by limiting productivity. Whilst the appli...
Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions of and Actions in Relation to Lameness Management
Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions of and Actions in Relation to Lameness Management
Lameness continues to be a welfare and economic issue for dairy cows. However, the consequences of lameness seem to be better understood by veterinarians and related personnel in c...
The relationship between sagittal hoof conformation and hindlimb lameness in the horse
The relationship between sagittal hoof conformation and hindlimb lameness in the horse
SummaryBackgroundLameness can be multifactorial and may result from the accumulation of multiple seemingly unrelated causes. The identification of factors associated with lameness ...
Treatment protocols for claw horn lesions and their impact on lameness recovery, pain sensitivity, and lesion severity in moderately lame primiparous dairy cows
Treatment protocols for claw horn lesions and their impact on lameness recovery, pain sensitivity, and lesion severity in moderately lame primiparous dairy cows
This study aims to investigate the effects of routine treatment protocols for claw horn disruptive lesions (CHDL) on lameness recovery rates, pain sensitivity, and lesion severity ...
Quality of cows hoof horn by purulent pododermatitis
Quality of cows hoof horn by purulent pododermatitis
The article deals with the results of biochemical and biophysical search of hoof horn of clinically healthy cows and patients with purulent pododermatitis. It is known that the dev...
Claw Trimming as a Lameness Management Practice and the Association with Welfare and Production in Dairy Cows
Claw Trimming as a Lameness Management Practice and the Association with Welfare and Production in Dairy Cows
Lameness resulting from claw lesions remains a pressing welfare issue in dairy cows. Claw trimming (CT) is a common practice for prevention and management of clinically lame cows. ...

