Javascript must be enabled to continue!
PS01.150: NEW METHOD OF ESOPHAGO-GASTRO ANASTOMOSIS AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Medical science has introduced a lot of innovations and advanced equipment since the first esophagectomy was performed, nevertheless surgeons still continue to discuss benefits of certain methods and suggest changes to them because mortality and post-operative complications after esophagus resection remain high. The choice of the surgical approach, anastomosis location and its variety, conduit location and its variety, the volume of lymph node dissection and the use of minimally invasive present the most important and complex issues for surgeons.
Methods
The research included 40 patients who were given Lewis surgery for malignant tumors of esophagus in Shalimov's National Institute of Surgery and Transplantation: Control group comprised 20 patients who were given Lewis surgery involving end-to-side classical mechanical EGA through a circular suturing tool.; Research group comprised 20 patients who were given Lewis surgery involving invaginated mechanical EGA. (image 1).
The objects for estimation included post-operative mortality as well as the number of post-operative anastomosis complications: the number of EGA leakages in the early post-operative period and the number of post operative strictures in the EGA area three months after the surgery. Data processing was done by means of Statistic—licensed application programs for Windows. Differences were considered valid if р < 0,05.
Results
Research group did not register a single case of EGA leakage while one patient in control group (р < 0,05). had the leakage which was stopped by means of ‘Endovac’ system. There were 2 cases of esophagus post-operative strictures which developed 3 months after the surgery in the research group which was less than in the control group which saw 6 cases of strictures of EGA (р < 0,05). Neither of the groups had any cases of post-operative mortality.
Conclusion
Our results allows us to conclude that invaginated mechanical EGA within Lewis surgery reduces post-operative complications of anastomosis in patients with esophagectomy.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: PS01.150: NEW METHOD OF ESOPHAGO-GASTRO ANASTOMOSIS AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY
Description:
Abstract
Background
Medical science has introduced a lot of innovations and advanced equipment since the first esophagectomy was performed, nevertheless surgeons still continue to discuss benefits of certain methods and suggest changes to them because mortality and post-operative complications after esophagus resection remain high.
The choice of the surgical approach, anastomosis location and its variety, conduit location and its variety, the volume of lymph node dissection and the use of minimally invasive present the most important and complex issues for surgeons.
Methods
The research included 40 patients who were given Lewis surgery for malignant tumors of esophagus in Shalimov's National Institute of Surgery and Transplantation: Control group comprised 20 patients who were given Lewis surgery involving end-to-side classical mechanical EGA through a circular suturing tool.
; Research group comprised 20 patients who were given Lewis surgery involving invaginated mechanical EGA.
(image 1).
The objects for estimation included post-operative mortality as well as the number of post-operative anastomosis complications: the number of EGA leakages in the early post-operative period and the number of post operative strictures in the EGA area three months after the surgery.
Data processing was done by means of Statistic—licensed application programs for Windows.
Differences were considered valid if р < 0,05.
Results
Research group did not register a single case of EGA leakage while one patient in control group (р < 0,05).
had the leakage which was stopped by means of ‘Endovac’ system.
There were 2 cases of esophagus post-operative strictures which developed 3 months after the surgery in the research group which was less than in the control group which saw 6 cases of strictures of EGA (р < 0,05).
Neither of the groups had any cases of post-operative mortality.
Conclusion
Our results allows us to conclude that invaginated mechanical EGA within Lewis surgery reduces post-operative complications of anastomosis in patients with esophagectomy.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Related Results
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive technique for esophagectomy has emerged as the standard of care for resectable esophageal...
Comparison of early results between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy
Comparison of early results between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy
Abstract
Introduction: The study aim was to compare the operative time, estimated blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, intraoperative and postoperative complications, as we...
384 SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF INTRA-THORACIC ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC ANASTOMOSES UNDER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY VIA A PRONE POSITION
384 SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF INTRA-THORACIC ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC ANASTOMOSES UNDER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY VIA A PRONE POSITION
Abstract
Although minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been performed for esophageal cancer worldwide, intra-thoracic an...
Staged Turnbull-Cutait Pull-through Anastomosis Comparing With Direct Anastomosis Plus Prophylactic Ileostomy in the Treatment of Low Rectal Cancer After Internal Sphincter Resection (STAR-TAR):study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Staged Turnbull-Cutait Pull-through Anastomosis Comparing With Direct Anastomosis Plus Prophylactic Ileostomy in the Treatment of Low Rectal Cancer After Internal Sphincter Resection (STAR-TAR):study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background
Recent advancements in the understanding of lower rectum anatomy, rectal cancer biology, and surgical techniques have emphasized the importance of radic...
P53 MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUES FOR TRANSTHORACIC ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
P53 MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUES FOR TRANSTHORACIC ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
Abstract
Aim
To evaluate the clinical outcomes for open, minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy techniques for esophageal ...
P191 MINIMALLY-INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY IN TREATMENT FOR ESOPHAGEAL DISEASES
P191 MINIMALLY-INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY IN TREATMENT FOR ESOPHAGEAL DISEASES
Abstract
Aim
to study the benefits of the mini-invasive approach.
Background &...
Comparison of Yang-Monti ileal ureter-bladder anastomosis versus Yang-Monti ileal ureter-ureteral anastomosis for the treatment of ureteral stenosis: a randomized controlled trial in a miniature pig model
Comparison of Yang-Monti ileal ureter-bladder anastomosis versus Yang-Monti ileal ureter-ureteral anastomosis for the treatment of ureteral stenosis: a randomized controlled trial in a miniature pig model
Abstract
Background
The aim of the present study was to establish an animal model of Yang-Monti ileal ureter-bladder anastomosis and Yang-Monti ileal ureter-ureteral anastomosis an...
FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY—A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS
FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY—A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS
Abstract
Background
Esophagectomy remains the mainstay treatment for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive techniques have gaine...

