Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Qualitative Assessment of Early Adverse Effects of Pfizer–BioNTech and Sinopharm COVID-19 Vaccines by Telephone Interviews

View through CrossRef
Vaccines are considered the best approach for countering the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we compared early side effects associated with vaccination with the Sinopharm and Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines. Participants of this observational cohort were interviewed based on semi-structured telephone interviews, with enquiries about side effects that developed after vaccination with each dose of these vaccines. Overall, 1004 participants were enrolled, of which 51.1% received Sinopharm vaccine and 48.9% received the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine. After the first dose, 46.3% of participants had an adverse reaction, with injection site pain most commonly being reported (33.2%). Participants who received the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine had significantly higher frequencies of all types of adverse reactions (p < 0.01), with no significant differences in the duration of adverse reactions between the two vaccines. Regarding the second dose, 48.6% of participants had adverse reactions, with injection site pain being most commonly reported (29%). Those who received the Pfizer vaccine reported higher frequencies of all adverse reactions (p < 0.01). However, a longer duration of adverse reactions was seen among Sinopharm vaccine recipients as compared to Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine recipients (p = 0.01). In conclusion, early adverse effects are reported following all types of vaccines but these are more likely to be encountered following the administration of new-generation vaccines. These side effects are mostly mild and treatable.
Title: Qualitative Assessment of Early Adverse Effects of Pfizer–BioNTech and Sinopharm COVID-19 Vaccines by Telephone Interviews
Description:
Vaccines are considered the best approach for countering the COVID-19 pandemic.
In this study, we compared early side effects associated with vaccination with the Sinopharm and Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines.
Participants of this observational cohort were interviewed based on semi-structured telephone interviews, with enquiries about side effects that developed after vaccination with each dose of these vaccines.
Overall, 1004 participants were enrolled, of which 51.
1% received Sinopharm vaccine and 48.
9% received the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine.
After the first dose, 46.
3% of participants had an adverse reaction, with injection site pain most commonly being reported (33.
2%).
Participants who received the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine had significantly higher frequencies of all types of adverse reactions (p < 0.
01), with no significant differences in the duration of adverse reactions between the two vaccines.
Regarding the second dose, 48.
6% of participants had adverse reactions, with injection site pain being most commonly reported (29%).
Those who received the Pfizer vaccine reported higher frequencies of all adverse reactions (p < 0.
01).
However, a longer duration of adverse reactions was seen among Sinopharm vaccine recipients as compared to Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine recipients (p = 0.
01).
In conclusion, early adverse effects are reported following all types of vaccines but these are more likely to be encountered following the administration of new-generation vaccines.
These side effects are mostly mild and treatable.

Related Results

SARS-CoV-2 infection rates after different vaccination schemes
SARS-CoV-2 infection rates after different vaccination schemes
Objective: To identify effects of various nationwide vaccination protocols on the evolution of new SARS-CoV-2 infections among adult population and to evaluate the safe...
Safety Profile of COVID-19 Vaccines among Healthcare Workers in Poland
Safety Profile of COVID-19 Vaccines among Healthcare Workers in Poland
The aim of the study was to compare the safety profiles (prevalence of both local and systemic side effects) of COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer–BioNTech, Moderna, Oxford–AstraZeneca) amo...
Prevalence and predictors for adverse effects of Sinopharm and Sinovac COVID-19 Vaccines.
Prevalence and predictors for adverse effects of Sinopharm and Sinovac COVID-19 Vaccines.
Objective: To see the prevalence and potential predictors for side effects of Sinopharm and Sinovac COVID-19 vaccines among students of medical, and BS human nutrition and dietetic...
Comparative IgG Antibody Titers Following Second Dose of Sinopharm and Pfizer Vaccination
Comparative IgG Antibody Titers Following Second Dose of Sinopharm and Pfizer Vaccination
<p><strong>Background and Objective: </strong>The vaccines Sinopharm and Pfizer account for more than 7.3 billion vaccinations across the globe. Study data shows ...
COVID-19 vaccines-related adverse events and associated factors reported among adult Egyptians
COVID-19 vaccines-related adverse events and associated factors reported among adult Egyptians
COVID-19 vaccine recipients are more likely to experience post-vaccination adverse events, which are considered the source of concerns about vaccine safety. This study aims to desc...
Side Effects of COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA Vaccine in Children Aged 12–18 Years in Saudi Arabia
Side Effects of COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA Vaccine in Children Aged 12–18 Years in Saudi Arabia
Background: Massive vaccination campaigns have been undertaken globally to combat the spread of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). While most COVID-19 vaccines have shown exc...
Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in university students
Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in university students
Background Existing data on adverse effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among university students are limited. This study aimed to investigate the characteristi...
A Novel Non-Covalent Modulator of Hemoglobin Improves Anemia and Reduces Sickling in a Mouse Model of Sickle Cell Disease
A Novel Non-Covalent Modulator of Hemoglobin Improves Anemia and Reduces Sickling in a Mouse Model of Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a severe genetic disorder caused by a single point mutation on the β-chain of adult hemoglobin (Hb A), β6 Glu→Val (Hb S). In the deoxygenated state Hb ...

Back to Top