Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Use of Psychology as Strategy in Hybrid Warfare

View through CrossRef
The term Political War or Hybrid warfare is not new, Clausewitz and Kennan have already talked about it in the past as the use of all means available to the State actors and not State actor to create instability in an opposing State. Political warfare has the characteristic of using a certain level of violence that remains underneath conventional conflict. It is definition dates back to 1948, and it is the use of all means available to a Country, excluding war, to achieve their goals - the US State Department used a definition at the beginning of the Cold War - which we find today in a global competition context. Starting from the 90s, the concept of threat has taken on less and less definable forms and still less connection to purely military actions. The actors that resort to the hybrid threat are also less identifiable, which can be stated entities but also non-state entities such as terrorism. The hybrid threat could be considered as the combined and synergistic use of different tools of power available to the States, or a non-States, (non-States actors), and these tools can be, military, diplomatic, political, technological, intelligence, economic - financial, media and psychological. Some of these tools are obviously, while others are hidden, others are military, but most of them are non-military instruments, such as propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare (psyops - psychological operations), cyberattacks, support for specific movements or political parties in another country. After quickly introducing what is meant by Hybrid Warfare or Hybrid Threat I would like to enter into the heart of the subject by talking about the use of psychological warfare as a military technique different from war, or a nonmilitary warfare action, in declared conflicts and undeclared conflicts. The psychological element has always been of primary importance in the conflicts. For this reason, I would like to speak about the use of psychological warfare as a technique within the hybrid conflict, also discuss the other psychological warfare tools and their use. These instruments are the psyops operations, the cognitive and communicative war, and the last point that would like to treat is the use of psychological warfare techniques through social media and the propaganda. This contribution of mine provide to suggest a theoretical and practical reflection on the new hybrid war strategies and analysing how ancient military tactics already being consciously readapted and strengthened through the use of new technologies.
Title: The Use of Psychology as Strategy in Hybrid Warfare
Description:
The term Political War or Hybrid warfare is not new, Clausewitz and Kennan have already talked about it in the past as the use of all means available to the State actors and not State actor to create instability in an opposing State.
Political warfare has the characteristic of using a certain level of violence that remains underneath conventional conflict.
It is definition dates back to 1948, and it is the use of all means available to a Country, excluding war, to achieve their goals - the US State Department used a definition at the beginning of the Cold War - which we find today in a global competition context.
Starting from the 90s, the concept of threat has taken on less and less definable forms and still less connection to purely military actions.
The actors that resort to the hybrid threat are also less identifiable, which can be stated entities but also non-state entities such as terrorism.
The hybrid threat could be considered as the combined and synergistic use of different tools of power available to the States, or a non-States, (non-States actors), and these tools can be, military, diplomatic, political, technological, intelligence, economic - financial, media and psychological.
Some of these tools are obviously, while others are hidden, others are military, but most of them are non-military instruments, such as propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare (psyops - psychological operations), cyberattacks, support for specific movements or political parties in another country.
After quickly introducing what is meant by Hybrid Warfare or Hybrid Threat I would like to enter into the heart of the subject by talking about the use of psychological warfare as a military technique different from war, or a nonmilitary warfare action, in declared conflicts and undeclared conflicts.
The psychological element has always been of primary importance in the conflicts.
For this reason, I would like to speak about the use of psychological warfare as a technique within the hybrid conflict, also discuss the other psychological warfare tools and their use.
These instruments are the psyops operations, the cognitive and communicative war, and the last point that would like to treat is the use of psychological warfare techniques through social media and the propaganda.
This contribution of mine provide to suggest a theoretical and practical reflection on the new hybrid war strategies and analysing how ancient military tactics already being consciously readapted and strengthened through the use of new technologies.

Related Results

A Critical Review of Hybrid Warfare
A Critical Review of Hybrid Warfare
How should we understand hybrid warfare, which has recently been attracting attention, in international law? Until recently, war, in terms of international law, was relatively clea...
Hybrid Warfare
Hybrid Warfare
Hybrid warfare has been the bandwagon term to describe modern warfare in academic, policy, and journalist accounts. It describes a wide array of warfare techniques that do not corr...
Tracing the Genesis of Hybrid Warfare
Tracing the Genesis of Hybrid Warfare
The literature on hybrid warfare is relatively new as the term was only coined in 2006 and the subject remains open for new findings and research. The combination of tactics used i...
Cyber Warfare, Cyberbullying and Psychological Warfare: Ethical and Anticipated Ethical Issues
Cyber Warfare, Cyberbullying and Psychological Warfare: Ethical and Anticipated Ethical Issues
This analysis takes as its starting point the view that ideas that originate in the civilian arena can migrate to the area of warfare and cyber warfare. The central idea is that di...
Different Types of Information Warfare
Different Types of Information Warfare
Information warfare (IW) has recently become of increasing importance to the military, the intelligence community, and the business world. The purpose of many actors, like decision...
Different Types of Information Warfare
Different Types of Information Warfare
Information warfare (IW) has recently become of increasing importance to the military, the intelligence community, and the business world. The purpose of many actors, like decision...
Nuclear Weapons, Cyber Warfare, and Cyber Security: Ethical and Anticipated Ethical Issues
Nuclear Weapons, Cyber Warfare, and Cyber Security: Ethical and Anticipated Ethical Issues
     In this paper, we discuss the interrelationship of nuclear weapons, cyber warfare, and cyber security. Some of the most significant cyber threats to nuclear stability are now ...
CYBER WARFARE IN THE IRAN–ISRAEL CONFLICT: IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN SECURITY AND DIGITAL WARFARE
CYBER WARFARE IN THE IRAN–ISRAEL CONFLICT: IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN SECURITY AND DIGITAL WARFARE
The growing use of digital technologies has changed the essence of the conflict in the world, and cyber warfare has become a prominent aspect of modern security. The long-time riva...

Back to Top