Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of Different Photovoltaic Technologies

View through CrossRef
Renewable energy sources are critical to the global effort to achieve carbon neutrality. Alongside hydropower, wind and nuclear plants, the photovoltaic (PV) systems developed greatly, with new PV technologies emerging in recent years. Although the conversion efficiencies are improving and the materials used have a lower impact on the environment, the feasibility of these technologies is required to be assessed. This paper proposes a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) model to assess the feasibility of five PV technologies: high-efficiency silicon heterojunction cells (HJT), N-type monocrystalline silicon cells (N-type), P-type passivated emitter and rear contact cells (PERC), N-type tunnel oxide passivated contact cells (TOPCon) and bifacial TOPCon. The LCOE considers capital investment, government incentives, operation and maintenance costs, residual value of PV modules and total energy output during the PV system’s life span. To determine the influence of PV system’s capacity over the LCOE values, three systems are analyzed for each technology: 3 kW, 5 kW and 7 kW. The results show that the largest PV systems have the lowest LCOE values, ranging from 2.39 c€/kWh (TOPCon) to 2.92 c€/kWh (HJT) when incentives are accessed, and ranging from 6.05 c€/kWh (TOPCon) to 6.51 c€/kWh (HJT) without subsidies. The 3 kW and 5 kW PV systems have higher LCOE values due to lower energy output during lifetime.
Title: Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of Different Photovoltaic Technologies
Description:
Renewable energy sources are critical to the global effort to achieve carbon neutrality.
Alongside hydropower, wind and nuclear plants, the photovoltaic (PV) systems developed greatly, with new PV technologies emerging in recent years.
Although the conversion efficiencies are improving and the materials used have a lower impact on the environment, the feasibility of these technologies is required to be assessed.
This paper proposes a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) model to assess the feasibility of five PV technologies: high-efficiency silicon heterojunction cells (HJT), N-type monocrystalline silicon cells (N-type), P-type passivated emitter and rear contact cells (PERC), N-type tunnel oxide passivated contact cells (TOPCon) and bifacial TOPCon.
The LCOE considers capital investment, government incentives, operation and maintenance costs, residual value of PV modules and total energy output during the PV system’s life span.
To determine the influence of PV system’s capacity over the LCOE values, three systems are analyzed for each technology: 3 kW, 5 kW and 7 kW.
The results show that the largest PV systems have the lowest LCOE values, ranging from 2.
39 c€/kWh (TOPCon) to 2.
92 c€/kWh (HJT) when incentives are accessed, and ranging from 6.
05 c€/kWh (TOPCon) to 6.
51 c€/kWh (HJT) without subsidies.
The 3 kW and 5 kW PV systems have higher LCOE values due to lower energy output during lifetime.

Related Results

VIABILIDADE ECONÔMICA DA ENERGIA FOTOVOLTAICA PARA IRRIGANTES NO NORTE DE MINAS E VALE DO JEQUITINHONHA
VIABILIDADE ECONÔMICA DA ENERGIA FOTOVOLTAICA PARA IRRIGANTES NO NORTE DE MINAS E VALE DO JEQUITINHONHA
VIABILIDADE ECONÔMICA DA ENERGIA FOTOVOLTAICA PARA IRRIGANTES NO NORTE DE MINAS E VALE DO JEQUITINHONHA   MARCELO ROSSI VICENTE1, TARLEI APARECIDO SANTOS2, THALLES LOIOLA DIAS1, PA...
Solar fuels via two-step thermochemical redox cycles for power and fuel production
Solar fuels via two-step thermochemical redox cycles for power and fuel production
With the issue of the rise of anthropogenic CO2, global warming and rise of the primary energy demand, strong measures for the energy transition and the diversification with renewa...
The Energy-Logistics-Cost Nexus: Assessing LCOE Volatility, Decarbonization Barriers, and SDG 7 Alignment
The Energy-Logistics-Cost Nexus: Assessing LCOE Volatility, Decarbonization Barriers, and SDG 7 Alignment
Background/Purpose: While the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) is the universal benchmark for renewable energy investment decisions, conventional models remain static and fail to in...
The Energy-Logistics-Cost Nexus: Assessing LCOE Volatility, Decarbonization Barriers, and SDG 7 Alignment
The Energy-Logistics-Cost Nexus: Assessing LCOE Volatility, Decarbonization Barriers, and SDG 7 Alignment
Background/Purpose: While the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) is the universal benchmark for renewable energy investment decisions, conventional models remain static and fail to in...
An Energy Cost Assessment of Future Energy Scenarios: A Case Study on San Pietro Island
An Energy Cost Assessment of Future Energy Scenarios: A Case Study on San Pietro Island
The need for a clean and affordable energy supply is a major challenge of the current century. The tough shift toward a sustainable energy mix becomes even more problematic when fa...
Estimation of Levelized Cost of Energy for Small Modular Reactors in Colombia: A Monte Carlo Simulation Approach
Estimation of Levelized Cost of Energy for Small Modular Reactors in Colombia: A Monte Carlo Simulation Approach
Small modular reactors (SMRs) offer significant prospects for Colombia to diversify and decarbonize its energy mix by 2038, as specified in the National Energy Plan (PEN) 2022-2052...

Back to Top