Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i
View through CrossRef
Background:
Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrations in the circle system, thereby controlling the depth of anaesthesia.
Methods:
We studied the wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in the circle system with fixed fresh gas flow and vaporizer setting. We compared two modern anaesthesia work stations, the Aisys (GE, Madison, WI, USA) and FLOW-i (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) in a test lung model.
Results
: We found fresh-gas flow to have, as expected, a major influence on wash-in, as well as wash-out of sevoflurane. The wash-in time to reach a stable circle 1 MAC (2.1%) decreased from an average of 547 ± 83 seconds with a constant fresh gas flow of 300 ml/min and vaporizer setting of 8%, to a mean of 38 ± 6 seconds at a fresh gas flow of 4 L/min. There were only minor differences between the two works-stations tested; the Aisys was slightly faster at both 300 and 4 L/min flow. Time to further increase circle end-tidal concentration from 1-1.5 MAC showed likewise significant associations to fresh gas and decreased from 330 ± 24 seconds at 300 ml/L to less than a minute at constant 4 L/min (17 ± 11 seconds), without anaesthetic machine difference. Wash-out was also fresh gas flow dependent and plateaued at 7.5 L/min.
Conclusions
: Circle system wash-in and wash-out show clear fresh gas dependency and varies somewhat between the Aisys and Flow-i. The circle saturation, reaching 1 MAC end-tidal or increasing from 1-1.5 MAC can be achieved with both work-stations within 1.5 minutes at a constant fresh gas flow of 2 and 4 L/min. Wash-out plateaued at 7.5 L/min.
Title: Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i
Description:
Background:
Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia.
A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrations in the circle system, thereby controlling the depth of anaesthesia.
Methods:
We studied the wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in the circle system with fixed fresh gas flow and vaporizer setting.
We compared two modern anaesthesia work stations, the Aisys (GE, Madison, WI, USA) and FLOW-i (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) in a test lung model.
Results
: We found fresh-gas flow to have, as expected, a major influence on wash-in, as well as wash-out of sevoflurane.
The wash-in time to reach a stable circle 1 MAC (2.
1%) decreased from an average of 547 ± 83 seconds with a constant fresh gas flow of 300 ml/min and vaporizer setting of 8%, to a mean of 38 ± 6 seconds at a fresh gas flow of 4 L/min.
There were only minor differences between the two works-stations tested; the Aisys was slightly faster at both 300 and 4 L/min flow.
Time to further increase circle end-tidal concentration from 1-1.
5 MAC showed likewise significant associations to fresh gas and decreased from 330 ± 24 seconds at 300 ml/L to less than a minute at constant 4 L/min (17 ± 11 seconds), without anaesthetic machine difference.
Wash-out was also fresh gas flow dependent and plateaued at 7.
5 L/min.
Conclusions
: Circle system wash-in and wash-out show clear fresh gas dependency and varies somewhat between the Aisys and Flow-i.
The circle saturation, reaching 1 MAC end-tidal or increasing from 1-1.
5 MAC can be achieved with both work-stations within 1.
5 minutes at a constant fresh gas flow of 2 and 4 L/min.
Wash-out plateaued at 7.
5 L/min.
Related Results
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i
Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i
Background:
Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/min...
1-1-8 one-step sevoflurane wash-in scheme for low-flow anesthesia: simple, rapid, and predictable induction
1-1-8 one-step sevoflurane wash-in scheme for low-flow anesthesia: simple, rapid, and predictable induction
Abstract
Background Sevoflurane is suitable for low-flow anesthesia (LFA). LFA needs a wash-in phase. The reported sevoflurane wash-in schemes lack simplicity, target cover...
1-1-8 one-step sevoflurane wash-in scheme for low-flow anesthesia: simple, rapid, and predictable induction
1-1-8 one-step sevoflurane wash-in scheme for low-flow anesthesia: simple, rapid, and predictable induction
Abstract
Background Sevoflurane is suitable for low-flow anesthesia (LFA). LFA needs a wash-in phase. The reported sevoflurane wash-in schemes lack simplicity, target cover...
Adenosine Receptor Adora2b Plays a Mechanistic Role in the Protective Effect of the Volatile Anesthetic Sevoflurane during Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion
Adenosine Receptor Adora2b Plays a Mechanistic Role in the Protective Effect of the Volatile Anesthetic Sevoflurane during Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion
Abstract
Background
Liver ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury is characterized by hepatic tissue damage and an inflammatory response. This is accomp...
Comparison between Bispectral Index and Patient State Index as Measures of the Electroencephalographic Effects of Sevoflurane
Comparison between Bispectral Index and Patient State Index as Measures of the Electroencephalographic Effects of Sevoflurane
Background
The Bispectral Index (BIS) and the Patient State Index (PSI) quantify depth of anesthesia by analyzing the electroencephalogram. The authors examined...
Entropy-guided sevoflurane administration during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in the paediatric population
Entropy-guided sevoflurane administration during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in the paediatric population
Background
Maintaining optimal anesthetic depth during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in pediatric patients is challenging due to altered physiology and unreliable conven...
1-1-8 one-step sevoflurane-nitrous oxide wash-in scheme for low-flow anesthesia: simple, rapid, and predictable induction
1-1-8 one-step sevoflurane-nitrous oxide wash-in scheme for low-flow anesthesia: simple, rapid, and predictable induction
Abstract
Background
Sevoflurane is suitable for low-flow anesthesia (LFA). LFA needs a wash-in phase. The reported sevoflurane wash-in schemes lack simplicity, target cove...
1-1-8 one-step sevoflurane wash-in scheme for low-flow anesthesia: simple, rapid, and predictable induction
1-1-8 one-step sevoflurane wash-in scheme for low-flow anesthesia: simple, rapid, and predictable induction
Abstract
Background
Sevoflurane is suitable for low-flow anesthesia (LFA). LFA needs a wash-in pha...

