Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Art-Historical Fiction or Fictional Art History?
View through CrossRef
Abstract
In 1634 Zhang Taijie (b. 1588) published a woodblock edition of Baohuilu (A Record of Treasured Paintings), an extensive catalog of a massive painting collection he claimed to have built. This work would seem to be a useful resource for historians of Chinese art since it provides accounts of paintings by artists whose works are no longer extant. But there is one major problem: the book is a forgery. What is more, Zhang also forged paintings to match the documentation he created, so he could also profit from trading in them. Interestingly, the book also echoes unfounded claims registered in art-historical writings of the time, wherein leading critics and connoisseurs, including Dong Qichang (1555–1636), propounded completely contrived arguments by which they tried to establish legitimate lineages in Chinese art. Such propositions represent, borrowing from Eric Hobsbawm's insight, a kind of “invented tradition,” a fictional history of practice and artifact that runs as some thought it ought to have, rather than as it did. By looking into all the three major components of forgeries in early modern China that are referenced throughout Zhang Taijie's catalog—(1) fabricated texts, (2) forged paintings, and (3) fake histories/theories—this paper aims to explain how Baohuilu facilitated Zhang's candid desire for fame and profit in the booming art market of the time, while unveiling certain cultural, social, and genealogical anxieties and tensions negotiated in the form of art-historical theories.
Title: Art-Historical Fiction or Fictional Art History?
Description:
Abstract
In 1634 Zhang Taijie (b.
1588) published a woodblock edition of Baohuilu (A Record of Treasured Paintings), an extensive catalog of a massive painting collection he claimed to have built.
This work would seem to be a useful resource for historians of Chinese art since it provides accounts of paintings by artists whose works are no longer extant.
But there is one major problem: the book is a forgery.
What is more, Zhang also forged paintings to match the documentation he created, so he could also profit from trading in them.
Interestingly, the book also echoes unfounded claims registered in art-historical writings of the time, wherein leading critics and connoisseurs, including Dong Qichang (1555–1636), propounded completely contrived arguments by which they tried to establish legitimate lineages in Chinese art.
Such propositions represent, borrowing from Eric Hobsbawm's insight, a kind of “invented tradition,” a fictional history of practice and artifact that runs as some thought it ought to have, rather than as it did.
By looking into all the three major components of forgeries in early modern China that are referenced throughout Zhang Taijie's catalog—(1) fabricated texts, (2) forged paintings, and (3) fake histories/theories—this paper aims to explain how Baohuilu facilitated Zhang's candid desire for fame and profit in the booming art market of the time, while unveiling certain cultural, social, and genealogical anxieties and tensions negotiated in the form of art-historical theories.
Related Results
Küberpunk ilma teadusulmeta / Cyberpunk without Science Fiction
Küberpunk ilma teadusulmeta / Cyberpunk without Science Fiction
Artikkel lähtub hüpoteesist, et mida tehnilisemaks muutub nüüdisaegne globaliseerunud kultuuriruum, seda teadusulmelisemaks muutub realism, mis püüab seda kultuuriruumi usutavalt p...
Fictional Content
Fictional Content
Abstract
It is usually taken for granted that a necessary condition for knowing that P is the truth of P. It may therefore be claimed that if we assume that we gain ...
Discarding the disclaimer? Reappraising fiction as a mode of biography
Discarding the disclaimer? Reappraising fiction as a mode of biography
While the biographical novel has created an openness to representing lives in fiction it is usually expected to provide a disclaimer certifying the work’s unreliability despite its...
Une année amoureuse de Virginia Woolf, ou la Fiction biographique multipliée
Une année amoureuse de Virginia Woolf, ou la Fiction biographique multipliée
"Une année amoureuse" de Virginia Woolf, or Biographical Fiction Multiplied
Christine Duhon's novel, which is a work of fiction based on the verifiable and reliably used biog...
Proximate historiographies in Jennifer Nansubuga Makumbi’s Kintu
Proximate historiographies in Jennifer Nansubuga Makumbi’s Kintu
Jennifer Nansubuga Makumbi’s novel Kintu (2014) places alongside forms of historical fiction familiar to European readers, a form of historical causality that obeys a different log...
Sensation Fiction: New Directions
Sensation Fiction: New Directions
2022 marks forty years since Patrick Brantlinger posed the question ‘What is Sensational About the Sensation Novel?’ Since then, scholars have continued to probe and extend early d...
Muriel Spark and the Art of Deception: Constructing Plausibility with the Methods of WWII Black Propaganda
Muriel Spark and the Art of Deception: Constructing Plausibility with the Methods of WWII Black Propaganda
Abstract
From May to October 1944, Muriel Spark was employed by the Political Warfare Executive (PWE), a secret service created by Britain during the Second World Wa...
Apocryphal stories in Kate Grenville’s Searching for the Secret River
Apocryphal stories in Kate Grenville’s Searching for the Secret River
In researching The Secret River (SR) Kate Grenville mobilised apocryphal stories in two ways: by employing and discarding a family apocryphal story; and by creating an alternative ...