Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?

View through CrossRef
AbstractThere is a popular belief in neuroscience that we are primarily data limited, and that producing large, multimodal, and complex datasets will, with the help of advanced data analysis algorithms, lead to fundamental insights into the way the brain processes information. These datasets do not yet exist, and if they did we would have no way of evaluating whether or not the algorithmically-generated insights were sufficient or even correct. To address this, here we take a classical microprocessor as a model organism, and use our ability to perform arbitrary experiments on it to see if popular data analysis methods from neuroscience can elucidate the way it processes information. Microprocessors are among those artificial information processing systems that are both complex and that we understand at all levels, from the overall logical flow, via logical gates, to the dynamics of transistors. We show that the approaches reveal interesting structure in the data but do not meaningfully describe the hierarchy of information processing in the microprocessor. This suggests current analytic approaches in neuroscience may fall short of producing meaningful understanding of neural systems, regardless of the amount of data. Additionally, we argue for scientists using complex non-linear dynamical systems with known ground truth, such as the microprocessor as a validation platform for time-series and structure discovery methods.Author SummaryNeuroscience is held back by the fact that it is hard to evaluate if a conclusion is correct; the complexity of the systems under study and their experimental inaccessability make the assessment of algorithmic and data analytic technqiues challenging at best. We thus argue for testing approaches using known artifacts, where the correct interpretation is known. Here we present a microprocessor platform as one such test case. We find that many approaches in neuroscience, when used na•vely, fall short of producing a meaningful understanding.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Title: Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?
Description:
AbstractThere is a popular belief in neuroscience that we are primarily data limited, and that producing large, multimodal, and complex datasets will, with the help of advanced data analysis algorithms, lead to fundamental insights into the way the brain processes information.
These datasets do not yet exist, and if they did we would have no way of evaluating whether or not the algorithmically-generated insights were sufficient or even correct.
To address this, here we take a classical microprocessor as a model organism, and use our ability to perform arbitrary experiments on it to see if popular data analysis methods from neuroscience can elucidate the way it processes information.
Microprocessors are among those artificial information processing systems that are both complex and that we understand at all levels, from the overall logical flow, via logical gates, to the dynamics of transistors.
We show that the approaches reveal interesting structure in the data but do not meaningfully describe the hierarchy of information processing in the microprocessor.
This suggests current analytic approaches in neuroscience may fall short of producing meaningful understanding of neural systems, regardless of the amount of data.
Additionally, we argue for scientists using complex non-linear dynamical systems with known ground truth, such as the microprocessor as a validation platform for time-series and structure discovery methods.
Author SummaryNeuroscience is held back by the fact that it is hard to evaluate if a conclusion is correct; the complexity of the systems under study and their experimental inaccessability make the assessment of algorithmic and data analytic technqiues challenging at best.
We thus argue for testing approaches using known artifacts, where the correct interpretation is known.
Here we present a microprocessor platform as one such test case.
We find that many approaches in neuroscience, when used na•vely, fall short of producing a meaningful understanding.

Related Results

Assessing Microprocessor complex mutations with a Microsensor system
Assessing Microprocessor complex mutations with a Microsensor system
The Microprocessor complex, consisting of DROSHA and DGCR8, is essential for miRNA maturation and gene regulation. Mutations in these proteins are associated with Wilms tumor (WiT)...
Emanuel Swedenborg: A Neuroscientist Before His Time
Emanuel Swedenborg: A Neuroscientist Before His Time
Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772) was a famous Swedish religious thinker and mystic He also wrote extensively on brain function Many of his writings on the brain remained unpublished ...
Brown-Séquard: Selected Contributions of a Nineteenth-Century Neuroscientist
Brown-Séquard: Selected Contributions of a Nineteenth-Century Neuroscientist
That eccentric experimentalist, Charles Edouard Brown-Séquard, flitted restlessly between the major cities of the old and new worlds in the nineteenth century, replacing outdated c...
Gaetano Perusini: The Forgotten Neuroscientist Behind “Alzheimer’s” Disease
Gaetano Perusini: The Forgotten Neuroscientist Behind “Alzheimer’s” Disease
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive and behavioral impairment with social and occupational impacts. This form of dementia is being i...
What is a Microprocessor?
What is a Microprocessor?
<div class="htmlview paragraph">A microprocessor is a device capable of automatically carrying out a sequence of operations on data expressed in discrete (digital) or continu...
Evaluation of nanofluids performance for simulated microprocessor
Evaluation of nanofluids performance for simulated microprocessor
In this investigation, deionized water was used as base fluid. Two different types of nanoparticles, namely Al2O3 and Cu were used with 0.251% and 0.11% volumetric concentrations i...
Interplay between pre-mRNA splicing and microRNA biogenesis within the supraspliceosome
Interplay between pre-mRNA splicing and microRNA biogenesis within the supraspliceosome
Abstract MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are central regulators of gene expression, and a large fraction of them are encoded in introns of RNA polymerase II transcripts. Thus, th...

Back to Top