Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Review of Risk Assessment Instruments for Juvenile Sex Offenders

View through CrossRef
Risk assessment is considered to be a key element in the prevention of recidivism among juvenile sex offenders (JSOs), often by imposing long-term consequences based on that assessment. The authors reviewed the literature on the predictive accuracy of six well-known risk assessment instruments used to appraise risk among JSOs: the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II), Juvenile Sexual Offence Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II (J-SORRAT-II), Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offence Recidivism (ERASOR), Juvenile Risk Assessment Scale (JRAS), Structured Assessment of Violent Risk in Youth (SAVRY), and Hare Psychopathy Checklist:Youth Version (PCL:YV). Through a systematic search, 19 studies were reviewed. Studies showed differences in the predictive accuracies for general, violent, and sexual recidivism, and none of the instruments showed unequivocal positive results in predicting future offending. Not unexpectedly, the accuracy of the SAVRY and PCL:YV appeared to be weaker for sexual recidivism compared with specialized tools such as the J-SOAP-II or the ERASOR. Because of the rapid development of juveniles, it is questionable to impose long-term restrictions based on a risk assessment only. New challenges in improving risk assessment are discussed.
Title: Review of Risk Assessment Instruments for Juvenile Sex Offenders
Description:
Risk assessment is considered to be a key element in the prevention of recidivism among juvenile sex offenders (JSOs), often by imposing long-term consequences based on that assessment.
The authors reviewed the literature on the predictive accuracy of six well-known risk assessment instruments used to appraise risk among JSOs: the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II), Juvenile Sexual Offence Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II (J-SORRAT-II), Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offence Recidivism (ERASOR), Juvenile Risk Assessment Scale (JRAS), Structured Assessment of Violent Risk in Youth (SAVRY), and Hare Psychopathy Checklist:Youth Version (PCL:YV).
Through a systematic search, 19 studies were reviewed.
Studies showed differences in the predictive accuracies for general, violent, and sexual recidivism, and none of the instruments showed unequivocal positive results in predicting future offending.
Not unexpectedly, the accuracy of the SAVRY and PCL:YV appeared to be weaker for sexual recidivism compared with specialized tools such as the J-SOAP-II or the ERASOR.
Because of the rapid development of juveniles, it is questionable to impose long-term restrictions based on a risk assessment only.
New challenges in improving risk assessment are discussed.

Related Results

The assessment of teamwork competencies for students focuses on dimensionality and mixed-method assessment
The assessment of teamwork competencies for students focuses on dimensionality and mixed-method assessment
The challenges of assessing teamwork competency, which internal structures can be multidimensional and complex. It is necessary to assess of the teamwork competency as unidimension...
Are Men Who Buy Sex Different from Men Who Do Not?: Exploring Sex Life Characteristics Based on a Randomized Population Survey in Sweden
Are Men Who Buy Sex Different from Men Who Do Not?: Exploring Sex Life Characteristics Based on a Randomized Population Survey in Sweden
AbstractThe buying and selling of sex is a topic of frequent discussion and a relevant public health issue. Studies of sex workers are available, while studies addressing the deman...
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women
AbstractBackgroundWomen experience adverse drug reactions, ADRs, nearly twice as often as men, yet the role of sex as a biological factor in the generation of ADRs is poorly unders...
Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains
Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains
AbstractIn this systematic review, we highlight the differences between the male and female zebrafish brains to understand their differentiation and their use in studying sex-speci...
Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender
Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender
Abstract Background Evidence from clinical research indicates that men and women can differ in response to drug treatment. The knowledge database Ja...
Integrated analysis of robust sex-biased gene signatures in human brain
Integrated analysis of robust sex-biased gene signatures in human brain
Abstract Background Sexual dimorphism is highly prominent in mammals with many physiological and behavioral differences between male and female form...
Redesigning Assessment for Holistic Learning
Redesigning Assessment for Holistic Learning
This paper discusses the importance of holistic assessment in the teaching and learning process at all levels of education, both in schools and in higher education institutions. Re...
Comparative effects of self-assessment, peer-assessment, and teacher assessment on EFL learners’ writing performance
Comparative effects of self-assessment, peer-assessment, and teacher assessment on EFL learners’ writing performance
Self-assessment and peer-assessment, as two alternative assessment procedures, have appealed to researchers in recent years and motivated L2 researchers to examine these two techni...

Back to Top