Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

THE RECOGNITION OF THE DECEASED BIOMETRIC DATA UNDER PERSONAL NON-PROPERTY RIGHTS IN TERMS OF THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION

View through CrossRef
The authors of this work claim that the legislation of the European Union does not adequately protect biometric data, due to the actuality that the protection of biometric data after the death of a person is unresolved within the legal field of personal data protection. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does not apply to deceased individuals, meaning that biometric data that was processed under the GDPR during the individual's lifetime continues to be at risk of re-processing after the individual's death, meaning that businesses can potentially avoid GDPR when the person has died, and decide the fate of the deceased's biometrics at their own discretion. Taking into account the above, the authors of the work consider it necessary to orient special legislation to overcome the specified legal gap, and since the regulation on the protection of personal data is vague to solve the problem, the research proposal of the authors consists in the application of legal guarantees not only under the GDPR but also in conformity with civil law. Therefore, the authors aim to initiate provisions for potential legislation, including the consolidation of the processing of biometric data of the deceased as part of a person's last will. The development of legal norms that would protect the biometric data of deceased persons by classifying them as non-property rights is especially recommended for countries with a civil law system. The research paper also warns that privileges that belong to the non-property rights of an individual do not, as a rule, automatically pass to heirs. In this regard, in the absence of a person's will to decide the future fate of biometric data that is continuously processed at the time or after death, the authors offer to allow family members and other close persons to exercise the right to the protection of personal data, such as the right to be forgotten, on behalf of the deceased, and to demand the condition of appropriate technical and organizational guarantees in the event of such performance. In this matter, according to the authors, it is expedient to conclude agreements between interested parties and family members to determine the fate of biometric data. However, in order to avoid the realization of the right to the protection of personal data, which the deceased did not have time to realize during his lifetime, and if during the life of the person Article, 9 (2, a) GDPR confirmed as the basis for the permitted biometric data processing because it is subject to the consent of the person, then following the human-centric approach of the European Union, it is proposed to design and indicate in such consent a clause where the individual could specifically determine and decide the fate of the biometric data upon death, for example, to (i) delete, (ii) transfer for the research purposes. Consequently, the authors predict the development of legal regulation of biometric data by assigning it to the category of non-property rights. Hence, the adoption of special provisions for the protection of the deceased biometric data and ensuring the realization of the right to personal data protection is expected not only during life but also after death.
Title: THE RECOGNITION OF THE DECEASED BIOMETRIC DATA UNDER PERSONAL NON-PROPERTY RIGHTS IN TERMS OF THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION
Description:
The authors of this work claim that the legislation of the European Union does not adequately protect biometric data, due to the actuality that the protection of biometric data after the death of a person is unresolved within the legal field of personal data protection.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does not apply to deceased individuals, meaning that biometric data that was processed under the GDPR during the individual's lifetime continues to be at risk of re-processing after the individual's death, meaning that businesses can potentially avoid GDPR when the person has died, and decide the fate of the deceased's biometrics at their own discretion.
Taking into account the above, the authors of the work consider it necessary to orient special legislation to overcome the specified legal gap, and since the regulation on the protection of personal data is vague to solve the problem, the research proposal of the authors consists in the application of legal guarantees not only under the GDPR but also in conformity with civil law.
Therefore, the authors aim to initiate provisions for potential legislation, including the consolidation of the processing of biometric data of the deceased as part of a person's last will.
The development of legal norms that would protect the biometric data of deceased persons by classifying them as non-property rights is especially recommended for countries with a civil law system.
The research paper also warns that privileges that belong to the non-property rights of an individual do not, as a rule, automatically pass to heirs.
In this regard, in the absence of a person's will to decide the future fate of biometric data that is continuously processed at the time or after death, the authors offer to allow family members and other close persons to exercise the right to the protection of personal data, such as the right to be forgotten, on behalf of the deceased, and to demand the condition of appropriate technical and organizational guarantees in the event of such performance.
In this matter, according to the authors, it is expedient to conclude agreements between interested parties and family members to determine the fate of biometric data.
However, in order to avoid the realization of the right to the protection of personal data, which the deceased did not have time to realize during his lifetime, and if during the life of the person Article, 9 (2, a) GDPR confirmed as the basis for the permitted biometric data processing because it is subject to the consent of the person, then following the human-centric approach of the European Union, it is proposed to design and indicate in such consent a clause where the individual could specifically determine and decide the fate of the biometric data upon death, for example, to (i) delete, (ii) transfer for the research purposes.
Consequently, the authors predict the development of legal regulation of biometric data by assigning it to the category of non-property rights.
Hence, the adoption of special provisions for the protection of the deceased biometric data and ensuring the realization of the right to personal data protection is expected not only during life but also after death.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Implications Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights For Obtaining Economic Benefits
Implications Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights For Obtaining Economic Benefits
Intellectual property rights are an implication of the development of international trade, especially in industrial countries. In developing countries, the understanding and protec...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Rimska obitelj na grobnim natpisima iz Donje Panonije tijekom principata
Rimska obitelj na grobnim natpisima iz Donje Panonije tijekom principata
This thesis is a study of the Roman family in the province of Lower Pannonia. It investigates the importance of familial and non-familial relationships attested on funerary inscrip...
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo
1Claims — Admissibility — Diplomatic protection — Local remedies — Claim by Guinea on behalf of Guinean national — Whether Guinea lacking standing — Whether remedies under Congoles...
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Fig. 1: Photo by Miguel Orós, from unsplash.comFeminism has stalled at the bedroom door. In the post-#metoo era, more than ever, we need intimate civil rights in our relationships ...
A Novel Multimodal Biometric Person Authentication System Based on ECG and Iris Data
A Novel Multimodal Biometric Person Authentication System Based on ECG and Iris Data
Existing security issues like keys, pins, and passwords employed presently in almost all the fields that have certain limitations like passwords and pins can be easily forgotten; k...

Back to Top